Philosophy: Thesis madness

Last updated on: May 28, 2007 at 7:57 pm by Justin Whitaker

Philosophy: Thesis madness 2007-05-28T19:57:00-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yes, I know, I know… I had just decided to relax for the summer, but I had a pre-scheduled meeting with a would-be advisor and today we discussed a thesis idea and the red tape to be overcome. Now it looks like I’ll be attempting a thesis / completed MA after all. Below is the proposal I made up between 10 and 10:45 (ready for our meeting at 11am). The stricken parts are those he suggested I basically leave out, red indicates notes from our conversation; ‘focus’ was the word he uttered most.

Justin Whitaker (draft one, May 28, 2007)
Thesis: Embodied Mind, Metaphysics, and Environmental Ethics

Intro: Following in the work of Deep Ecology and the “Organic View” of man and nature we find that the story of “who we are” is central to environmental ethics. This view, which aligns itself most readily to Virtue and Deontological ethics is opposed to so-called shallow ecology, which works primarily in the framework of Utilitarian ethics. Just argue that metaphysics is important to environmental ethics, how and why; work out the details as we go. Don’t throw out too much at once, it will confuse the readers and/or give them lots to pick at.

Part One: A history of the development of our current situation, through the Greeks, Descartes, Leibniz et al. Creation of the principles of scientific materialism (monism, reductionism, universalism, objectivism, physicalism, closure principle). Focus on Descartes and the resulting objectivism/objectification of nature. The rest can be mentioned, but again, can be confusing and opens you up to objections.

Part Two: Challenges to the principles of scientific materialism: Humean Skepticism, Kant, Sartre, Quine, quantum mechanics and contemporary cognitive science. Also deep ecology and the ‘organic view’ of nature, to be described further in part five.sf Maybe just use Sartre’s critique of Cartesian dualism, show where it falls short. Kant may be difficult because his “Copernican Revolution” works more in terms of Epistemology and I don’t want to go down that path (again confusing readers – stay focused on metaphysics).

Note: parts one and two may be combined.

Part Three: Buddhist principles of interconnectedness vs. selfishness. The notion of self-development as essential to realizing interconnectedness (which is a tenant shared with Deep Ecology) directly rather than merely intellectually; i.e. practical metaphysics. This looks like it could be the bulk of the paper, given I can find someone on campus who knows Buddhism well enough to oversee it.

Note: This part could be lengthy.

Part Four: Dualism refined and reaffirmed, essays of Holmes Rolston III et al. Probably unnecessary, as Rolston at least doesn’t address metaphysical issues directly.

Part Five: “Who we are” as a metaphysical game versus as a way of being in the world. The realizations and limitations of deep ecology. Preston’s prescription of eco-cognitive travel. Buddhism’s prescription of meditation, self development. Affinities with Rolston, et al.

Conclusion: A final theory of Environmental Ethics and prescription for bringing it into practice (cf. Anna Peterson). Note: This part would be brief, exploratory, speculative. Combine Part Five and the Conclusion, focus on the move from metaphysics to real world application – the application is what is going to interest people.

There are three applications to be discussed. First is the experiences of ‘deep ecologists’, people who advocate the innate interconnectedness and equal value of all life. These people advocate for this mostly based on months or years spent in wilderness. These experiences have humbled them from the dualistic ‘man-over-nature’ view that predominates today. The second experience comes from Buddhist meditation and personal development. Buddhism begins with the individual (individuated by ignorance of interconnectedness) and ends, after much practice, in directly experienced interconnectedness – a valuing of and care for all beings. The third experience is outlined by Christopher Preston (now my advisor) in his book, “Grounding Knowledge: Environmental Philosophy, Epistemology, and Place.” He calls it ‘dislocating experience‘ and describes it as a move to another environment that puts a person “both literally and metaphorically out of place” (p.89). Such experiences both shock us into the forceful realization of our interconnectedness with our surroundings and open us to new perspectives by which to understand ourselves, our values, our habits.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 27, 2007

Life: flickr madness

Next Post

May 30, 2007 Buddhism: Happiness Club

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz