Philosophy: ah – ha. The big story

Last updated on: February 4, 2007 at 12:30 am by Justin Whitaker

Philosophy: ah – ha. The big story 2007-02-04T00:30:00-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I feel like a child who has been playing in the woods not far from home, who has suddenly stumbled upon a giant, abandoned candy store. Something grand, from the 1950s perhaps, with tall, white-washed wooden walls and glimmering glass through which the delicacies within could not only be enticingly seen, but also smelled.

I’ve always read Genesis as an archaic myth, a story about humanity which is so out of date as to have lost all value. “People didn’t understand history then, so they made this up,” I thought. “It’s nice, but so are all of the other myths. And like them, it is false.”

Then this winter I took a course on the Philosophy of Religion, wherein our professor reacquainted us with Genesis, not as a myth of origins, but as a coming-of-age story. It was the story of any young man, at first living under the word and law of his father. The young boy would have been acquainted with women, or rather girls, as well, but would have made no notice of them – they would have just been other people. Then, one day, something would change in the boy – a pain in his abdomen would signify that things had changed. That pain would feel of loss, an absence that could only be filled by this newly arrived creature: woman.

It is poetic genius then to suggest that woman is made out of man’s rib. The coming-of-age significance is all the same: before the pain there had been no woman as opposed to man, just the two sexes, together made in the image of the heavenly ones.

With the appearance of woman comes a longing, but more importantly it brings an ‘Other’ to whom allegiance and love may be bestowed. Now it is no longer just God and Man. Man and woman both realize that their love for one-another is greater than their love for God in just the way we as adolescents begin to dissolve our exclusive devotion to our parents. The result is predictable: children disobey the Father and set out on their own, facing the inevitable consequences – the pains of childbirth and the toil of working the fields for one’s own food.

But it’s not all bad: they have eaten from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, they are no longer the ignorant children of Eden. By their own will they have asserted themselves against the father, and by their own will they are left to make it in the world, our world.

The moral of the story? We all must emerge from the law of our father and make it on our own. If we do well enough, we then will become the father/mother and watch our children follow the same pattern. It’s difficult. “Life is no Eden,” our professor instructed us. But it is this way for us all, and as such it is up to each of us to make the very best of our pains and toils.

Today I’m reading Ishmael: An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit for yet another class dealing with religion. The story, which is beautifully written (a must-read), gives me reason to ponder yet another meaning to Genesis: as a Paleontology, a long history of humankind. Eden, in this story, is humankind before agriculture, when we had no control over nature, no manipulative powers. Then, we lived just like the tiger and the wombat, at the mercy of and part of the natural world. This is the bulk of human history, and, to quote Genesis, “it was very good.“

But something fundamentally changed with the onset of agriculture. We became dissatisfied with wandering in the world and wanted to just settle down. We categorized the world around us, we gave names to every living creature encountered. But this did not satiate our urge for dominion. To do this we needed total control, command over the fields and beasts around us. For this, we needed agriculture. With agriculture, rather than being on par with nature, we played as lords over it. With this the world became ‘for us’, as if all of creation was ours, is ours.

This shift is the story of our civilization today. The premise that the world is ‘for us’ and that we are separate somehow from the rest of creation is the premise of our culture. It is the story we tell our children before bed, but also the story we hear on the evening news and on the corporate billboards, in the academic curricula and in the novels we read. And, according to Ishmael at least, it is the premise of a dying culture. It is a myth gone bad.

Ah-ha. That is the big story. The story we tell ourselves without even knowing it. It is the paradigm we live unconsciously. This is our mythology, and it’s not just in Genesis, but everywhere in our society. Can you see it? And what now?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 2, 2007

Philosophy: Kant on Happiness

Next Post

February 5, 2007 Life: a good sunday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz