Buddhism: seeking the phronemos, or “where do you throw your hat?”

Last updated on: June 3, 2006 at 6:02 pm by Justin Whitaker

Buddhism: seeking the phronemos, or “where do you throw your hat?” 2006-06-03T18:02:00-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I write this in partial response to a question casually posed to me by Paul Dietrich, the head of the Religious Studies department here at UM. I had been invited to his office to discuss the possibility of my taking on the Buddhism teaching for the department. The current professor and my mentor of sorts, Dr. Alan Sponberg, has requested a two year leave to work to establish an intensive two-year training (both academic and practice-based) program in England in the Friends of the Western Buddhist Order. (whether I get the position is still up in the air, something I’ll no doubt cover at length in future postings)

Paul and I were discussing my background in Buddhist studies and somewhere along the way one of us noted that Dr. Sponberg (aka, Saramati, his ordination name) is a member of the Western Buddhist Order and Paul asked something to the effect of, “and where do you throw your hat?”

My response was that I don’t throw my hat anywhere. I have practiced with virtually every major Buddhist tradition at one time or another, and the closest I’ve come to throwing my hat anywhere was probably with the FWBO (but even that would have been a half-hearted hat toss), or with Geshe Michael Roach’s teachings in the Tibetan Gelug tradition. I’ve all but ruled out the FWBO at this point for reasons I won’t go in to now, but the local FWBO center is still where I’ll go for my ‘Sangha’ nights. My karmic connection to Geshe Michael is still very strong (I highly recommend his course on Shantideva’s “Guide to the Bodhisattva’s Way of Life”), but I’ve chosen a path (academia) that keeps me at a distance from Geshe Michael and his teachings at least for the time being.

Part of that path, and part of philosophy in general, is the demand that we each know for ourselves what it is we might claim to be good, true, or beautiful. We can be thought of as standing firm on our knowledge (be it empirical, rational, phenomenological, etc) and moving forth only methodically from there. This is contrary to religious motivations, where we throw our hat, or take a leap of faith into this or that tradition.

I’ve met countless Buddhists all too willing to throw their hat into this tradition or that. And it worries me. On the one hand I recognize the power of tradition to move an individual forward on a spiritual path: clear direction, discipline, kind guidance, a safety-net in case of crisis, social networking, and so on. Philosophers need all of this too, and, to an extent, have it. My difficulty, my worry, is that I’ve also seen countless people hurt by the traditions they’ve so thrown themselves into (I’ve never seen anyone hurt by the realization that their favorite philosopher/philosophy is flawed).

This happens when the aim of the tradition, the spiritual advancement of each of its individual members, becomes secondary to other interests (the comfort or reputation of the leader(s), financial or geographical growth, acquisition of precious/holy objects, etc). This can only happen if members uncritically see the higher-ups in the tradition as somehow beyond human flaws, to be a perfect embodiment of practical wisdom, or phronemos (the person who lies at the heart of Aristotelian ethics). Once they do this, it is all too easy to just give up their critical faculties, their judgment of what is right and wrong, questioning what is spiritual progress and what is conceit and delusion.

That giving up, that surrender can sometimes be spiritual progress (if you’re a bit too full of yourself, for instance), but it mustn’t be an end in itself. You cannot live a whole life of surrender to any tradition or leader. You cannot give up that freedom which makes you human – it will come back. You will doubt yourself, your tradition, your leaders. To suppress that doubt, when it arises naturally, is to live a life not merely of surrender, but submission, subservience, and ultimately sub-humanity.

So my advice is that you don’t ever throw your hat, anywhere, but instead hold it and yourself as open to the world. If ever you enter a tradition (yes, even academia), do so half-heartedly, or rather, with a still-open-heart. Enter the tradition for your spiritual growth, not to be a part of something. Most of all, never allow yourself to be closed off from other traditions – never believe in claims to being unique holders of truth, unique paths to salvation or awakening or happiness. Maintaining openness is not easy, it takes discipline, some kind guidance, and often the help of friends. But openness is a path with a direction only you can know.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 27, 2006

Buddhism: The lives of my cohort, six months later

Next Post

June 7, 2006 Buddhism & Life: facing it

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz