Buddhism: Reflections on the Blogisattva Awards

Last updated on: March 8, 2006 at 4:58 am by Justin Whitaker

Buddhism: Reflections on the Blogisattva Awards 2006-03-08T04:58:00-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sunday marked a first in most of our worlds: the Blogisattva Awards hosted by Tom over at Blogmandu. My initial reaction (see #9 here) to the nomination(s) was a kind of ‘wow, how odd… but nice’.

For the most part I think this is how other bloggers took it as well (Tyson was happily surprised, Eric at Virtual Zen observed his ego swell). However, the comment section under the announcements post did receive some less-than-positive remarks. One nominee, Amadeus, commented:

“You are trying to sell your awards competition as Buddhism, something not at all compatible. Blogisattva, not to be confused with Bodhisattva? Some joke huh?” (here note: this is just one part of one of many of Amadeus’ comments, so getting the full context would be profitable)

One commenter noted:

“Taking notice of the flatterer turning vicious, I suspect these unjuried awards will mean nothing in the end.” (here)

And, well, you can read other comments if you wish. On the other hand, nearly all of those nominated were pretty gracious and humble about the whole thing (my favorite winner’s post is James’ at the Buddhist Blog), and many had streams of kind congratulations from readers and friends.

In reading all of this, three things came to mind. First and most obvious was the ego, that nasty little bugger, the asmi-mana, or conceit-I-am. Second is the notion of hierarchy in Buddhism; and third is the power of the blog for Buddhists, and for Westerners in general.

Like Eric, I saw my ego expanding, while appreciating the recognition. I know there were moments when I wanted to win, though I didn’t go so far as to size up opponents (oops) co-nominees to prognosticate my chances of winning for each category. I do apparently have a drive for competition, and the awards nominations brought that drive to my awareness to be observed and perhaps, dispelled a bit. So while my ego was stirred up, in my case it was done in the right way to get me to ‘sit with it’ rather than react to it. This may not have been the case for everyone.

Hierarchy in Buddhism isn’t really any specialty of mine (all I know is that I’m the most enlightened person I know), but it did come up a bit in the comments to the nominations at Blogmandu. All forms of Buddhism recognize an ultimate level of personal non-duality, that is, of a level of existence where we are all perfectly equal (you, me, Buddha, and Hitler). That level is variously our Buddha-Nature, our emptiness, our appearance here in samsara, our potential for radiant universal love, and so on. But for those of us who don’t spend every minute on this level, hierarchy will naturally arise. In philosophical-talk, we could say that hierarchy is a descriptive fact, not a normative one. That just means that while hierarchy is here, and is a real part of samsara, including Buddhism, it is not what we aim for or say ought to be. We all need a certain level of self-esteem, self-confidence, and self-love in order to begin the path to self-transcendence. (so just accept that I’m better than you)

Finally, I’m even less of an expert on the prospects of a future of blogging in America. Here again is probably where hierarchy is very helpful. Where would you be without Google, which ranks the sites of the web and promises to bring you only the most relevant (unless you’re in China, where you’ll get whatever the government wants you to see)? Tom’s site, Blogmandu, is a lovely service, bringing together relevant material from countless Buddhist-themed blogs each week. Technorati and others provide a similar service, but lack the human touch (the guy who can come on to your blog to argue with you about Buddha-Nature and quantum mechanics and Hegel and Ken Wilber)… The key to the survival, and perhaps even the actual relevance of the Buddhist blog will be folks like Tom who select from our drivelings something worthwhile, encouraging our efforts, and refining our methods.

It may sound egotistical, but I want to be read, and by lots of people. But I also see my blog (as with my mind) in need of a lot of work before it can be worthy of and useful to many people. I don’t aim to impose my thoughts on the world, but rather to share and to dialogue for mutual spiritual benefit. Life is too short (and human birth to precious) for all of us to sit in front of a computer just taking in, or just throwing thoughts out there for no one to see. At the same time, though, we all need to be wary of the potential for escapism into the blogosphere – take time to sit, to talk with real people, to walk in the woods – all of this will enrich what you say here and hopefully what you say and read here (speaking of the internet) will likewise enrich the rest of your life.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 5, 2006

Life: Friends in Low Places

Next Post

March 10, 2006 Philosophy: wut i lernd 2day, or, airing academic angst

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz