Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

American Buddhist Perspectives

Life: spiritual growth, freedom and tradition

Last updated on: December 1, 2005 at 6:10 am   by Justin Whitaker

Life: spiritual growth, freedom and tradition 2005-12-01T06:10:00-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“[O]ne has to be willing to let go of–or die to–the present level. Perhaps one has run up against its inherent limitations or contradictions (as Hegel would say), or one is beginning to disidentify with it (as Assagioli explained), or perhaps one has just gotten tired of it.”
– Ken Wilber (from tom’s comment, #13)

As I replied to tom’s comment, I agree with this general formula for spiritual growth. Each level is a sort of consciousness, a world-view, a system of conceptual connections. But how does one know what level he is at? I guess a full understanding of each level is a good start, but each theorist will cut up the levels in different ways and most, if not all, will realize and admit the artificiality of his or her particular system. But each will indicate that each level comes up to its own inherent limits. We find these limits through imminent critique (critique from within), and I think Socrates is our first immanent critic. He showed the simple incoherency of his interlocutors’ positions by simply getting them to contradict themselves through their own reasoning. The problem, for him (/Plato), Hegel, and Wilber is that it is perhaps too easy to find fault in the reasoning of others, yet very difficult to state a coherent system of your own.

Back to me. My difficulty lies in what I would call the ‘sore loser critique’. The sore loser critique can look, sound, and feel just like the immanent critique by which one legitimately moves from one level to the next. However, the sore loser simply assumes the attributes of the next level without personally realizing the limits of the prior level. To realize the limits of a level of consciousness, say that of Hegel’s ‘Stoic’ (see my schemata), one must fully LIVE that level; one must get inside it and use its world-view as a vehicle, driven until finally breaking down, at which point one ‘dies to’ that level and the next vehicle is taken up.

But I did not fully LIVE the Catholicism I was brought up in. I rejected it far to early to understand what exactly I was rejecting. I stepped out of that vehicle onto the lonely road of angst, only to be picked up like some vagabond hitch-hiker by the smooth sails of science. To be honest it was more like the smooth sails of science caught my eye while I was still in Catholicism, and perhaps my own version of Catholicism wasn’t the very best, top of the line version out there… Maybe I didn’t maintain my Catholicism well enough and maybe it is not to blame for my failed youth. Maybe my leaving it there on the side of the spiritual road one day as I embraced the cold logic of science was an accident, a sore loser critique, and not a step forward at all.

And then, after years as a ‘devout atheist’, I found my way into Buddhism. This deserves some time/thought… But for now I will leave with the Catholicism/atheism move.

A professor of mine, David Sherman, a ‘left-Hegelian’ (ie. basically a Marxist), discusses his conversations with a friend, a ‘right-Hegelian’ (ie. a Christian, state-loving conservative) in graduate school, and his friend telling him,

‘if you’re not reconciled [to the state, the current ethical totality], get reconciled’

(in a thick Southern accent, so ‘get’ should be ‘guee-it‘). The moral is that, in Hegel and likely in Wilber, we MUST fully realize (get reconciled with) any given level of consciousness before we can get beyond it. If we never enter it, live it, and sublate it, but instead grow up apart from it and only look upon its irrationality from OUTSIDE, then we have not moved, CAN NOT move, to the next, higher level of consciousness.

My concluding question is: are we ever free from traditions, or are we only ever free in them?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 29, 2005

Life: as in Vietnam, so too in Iraq

Next Post



December 2, 2005 Philosophy: Let freedom ring (free education, that is)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Mustard Seed, what does the seed represent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Pharisees Sin The kingdom of God Wealth

Support this
Column

Related posts from American Buddhist Perspectives

Buddhist

For Pride Month: Our 2015 Interview with La...

American Buddhist Perspectives

Buddhist

Standing up to Lies: Can America Emerge from...

American Buddhist Perspectives

Buddhist

Progressive responses to the 2020 election of Biden...

American Buddhist Perspectives

Buddhist

In strife and uncertainty: let us remember loving-kindness

American Buddhist Perspectives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Buddhist

On Taking Refuge in the Dharma

(Here I continue the feature of sharing talks and essays by teachers...

Easy, Right? A Dharma Talk

(Continuing my intention to share talks and essays by other members of Empty...

The Subtle Art of Bowing: A Dharma Discourse

(This presentation was first offered by my dear friend Dharma Holder Tom...

Internal Family Systems Can Heal you Mentally &...

How IFS Helped Me Stop Fighting Myself Internal Family Systems (IFS) is...

The Bible No One Spoke About: A Family’s...

A mysterious family Bible, unspoken faith, and a journey from curiosity to...

How Uncertainty Can Transform Your Life in 2025

Embracing Uncertainty: A New Year’s Resolution for the Brave As 2025 approaches,...

view all Buddhist blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube