Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
Strange Bedfellows – The Marriage of Religious Groups with Two-Party Political Systems

Strange Bedfellows – The Marriage of Religious Groups with Two-Party Political Systems

Last updated on: March 27, 2018 at 5:32 pm by Guest Contributor

Strange Bedfellows – The Marriage of Religious Groups with Two-Party Political Systems 2018-03-27T17:32:52-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Religion VS Politics; Image source – Twitter

The intersection of religion and politics in the U.S. and the reasonings these diverse groups devise in carving out alliances may be one of the greatest mysteries of our times. How is it that one of the most (supposedly) devout religious groups in the country, Evangelical Christians, could so overwhelmingly vote for a presidential candidate in the last election that could not even accurately quote a Bible verse, let alone adhere to policies and beliefs so antithetical to the teachings of ? Party politics seems to be the answer, and the allure of political power and belonging is a danger for any religious group, especially a minority like American Muslims.

The allure of adopting party policy-ethics is strong, and it may be a result of our two-party system. Because the parties must try and represent the broadest coalition possible to ensure election, the various groups that identify with either parties can make for strange bedfellows. It explains why Evangelicals and Exxon Mobil, or Muslims and the LGBTQ lobby, can coexist under the same tent. Both parties have mastered the means of emphasizing a set of shared ideals while simultaneously downplaying undeniable ideological differences among various coalition members.

But let’s look at Evangelicals to start: 81 percent of white Evangelicals voted for Donald J. Trump, more than any other presidential candidate since 2000. Among all the characters in the Holy Bible, Trump is more reminiscent of Herod or Pharaoh than any of the prophets, yet he was able to narrowly claim electoral victory because of such overwhelming Christian support.

Evangelicals are not entirely to blame. White Catholics and Mormons also voted in heavy numbers for Trump. Despite racist and anti-immigrant rhetoric, even the Hispanic Catholic vote from Trump was four points higher than it was for Mitt Romney in 2012. Though this may be a result of Democrats simply not showing up, the underlying issue could not be clearer: Religion and politics are deeply intertwined in the U.S.

Perhaps the most obvious example is that of Jerry Falwell Jr., president of Liberty University. Falwell gained national notoriety after addressing his university’s student body on December 4, 2015, in which he lambasted President Obama for suggesting greater gun control following a recent shooting and encouraged his students to acquire concealed carry permits in order to “end those Muslims.”

Hearing Falwell speak on gun rights might convince an unknowing listener that the second amendment is actually the 11th commandment.

Falwell is also an unwavering supporter of Donald Trump, denying the adulterous affair between the president and adult film actress Stormy Daniels and claiming that his theological conviction of God’s mercy excuses all his other behavior. However, Falwell says is explicitly; Evangelicals are in Trump’s camp because they supported his draconian policies on immigration and his willingness to cut taxes for the rich.

But how then, do Evangelicals and other faith groups justify supporting various candidates whose moral underpinnings may clash with their religious teachings? Time and time again our two-party systems’ goal of reaching the broadest coalition possibly makes for nonsensical or difficult partnerships.

Trying to remain true to Islamic ethical teachings can be difficult in this type of political system. Take American Muslim communities, for example. Though a majority of American Muslims once supported George W. Bush in 2000, most have voted Democrat in recent years, with 54 percent supporting Clinton in 2016. Though this shifted occurred abruptly following measures put in place after 9/11 that targeted American Muslims, communities have had little time to consider how it can be a member of the Democratic coalition while possibly maintaining some views contrary to other powerful coalition members, such as pro-life sentiments and commitment to traditional notions of marriage.

This should not mean that Muslims must be passive members of a particular party coalition. We can enhance the political party of our choosing by prompting them to question their often black-or-white political and social stances.

For example, could Muslims stand at the forefront of a new pro-life movement, one in which the sanctity of life in the womb is safeguarded but not in ways that limit the reproductive rights and economic opportunities of women (as Republican policies often do)? Could we uphold family values by supporting living wages, maternity leave, and subsidized childcare instead of trying to force our conception of marriage onto others?

The prospect of being politically engaged and authentically Muslim is possible; however, it requires intellectual effort and the courage to raise our voices among our fellow partisans, from whichever party they may come. If not, we run the risk of adopting partisan ethics contrary to prophetic teachings, in the same vein as Falwell and Evangelical Christians.

This is especially important as more Muslims start taking leadership positions in political parties, particularly the Democratic Party. Though the American Muslim community should encourage its members to become more active and involved, and the community as a whole should continue to stand with marginalized communities, we should also remember our own commitment to our religious ethics and not allow ourselves to be co-opted into either party.

Charles M. Turner is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Utah, and his research focuses on minority politics, particularly the inclusion of religious minorities in American democracies. Prior to continuing his studies, he served as the Muslim Life Coordinator at the University of Richmond, Government Teacher for the Madina School of Richmond, and a member of the Civic Outreach Committee at the Islamic Center of Virginia. His column appears (usually) in the third week of every month.

Previous Post

March 9, 2018

Five Stages of Spiritual Growth - Where Are You?

Next Post

March 29, 2018 The Unsung Sheroes of Women's History Month

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What two things does Paul say about those who preach a different gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They are false teachers They will face judgment Let them be under God's condemnation They have fallen from grace