Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
The Emotional Landmines of a ‘Hot Take’ Article

The Emotional Landmines of a ‘Hot Take’ Article

Last updated on: January 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm by Guest Contributor

The Emotional Landmines of a ‘Hot Take’ Article 2018-01-08T18:23:30-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

image source: Pixabay

Editor’s Note: The writers of the Patheos Muslim Channel recently opened up about their feelings on the hot take, a quick response to a current event, political debate or issues of the moment. The following response comes from columnist Nakia Jackson.

I love a hot take. When I read about a newsworthy or controversial situation, I appreciate the pithy commentary that sums up my own first impressions, or the witty counterpoint that I hadn’t even considered when I’m three-quarters into my first cup of coffee for the day.

Hot takes can sharpen the public focus on complex or obscure issues. A seemingly innocuous remark that somehow ruffled feathers across the globe can take years of experience to grasp, or a hot take can sum up the generations of tensions and conflicts that lay behind it. Hot takes don’t always get it right, but for a quick rundown of the most salient aspects of an issue or event, they’re excellent.

And, I do not ever plan to write one.

Controversial issues or events unfold in ways that make it very unlikely for me to write or offer a hot take. Hot takes emerge when an event happens, or someone makes a remark that sparks strong emotions and heated debate. That can’t happen in a vacuum.

There’s always a deeply nuanced history behind these kinds of controversies, and without knowing that history, I can’t know where the emotional landmines are. People who write hot takes sometimes know this history, but just as often, they miss crucial aspects that turn their Twitter mentions into a place where angels fear to tread.

My email inbox is enough of a mess without a flood of angry corrections, objections or worse.

In the aftermath of an event or remark, you’ll often see pieces that illustrate the historical and cultural context behind the controversy. These will often include remarks made by the people or groups involved in the controversy, their previous associations, and historical events that helped shape the situation. As the pieces come together, what seemed to be a benign remark can take on harsher tones, and the responses that sounded unreasonable initially make much more sense.

For those of us who aren’t directly involved or affected, it’s a job to keep up with the flow of information, let alone attempt to contextualize it. Getting fragments of a story in real time has its uses, but grabbing the first few bits and crafting a nuanced and well-reasoned stance based on them is a serious challenge.

I was an adult before the age of social media. I was in high school the day of the Oklahoma City bombing and in college on 9/11. I recall not only the uncertainty of not knowing from whence these attacks came, but also the error-prone speculation of the experts. Lots of experts use and encourage caution, but when faced with an unusual event, even the best of us can stumble.

This is complicated by having a public that can only get snippets of a discussion filled with debate and rumors. I’m not sure if the rumors are necessarily worse than someone in a position of authority calmly stating things that turn out to not be true. Hot takes that turn out to be wrong can do more damage when they’re delivered by a person perceived to be an authority, despite attempts to withdraw statements and control damage. Nobody will mistake me for an authority on anything, but I strive to not submit anything I must retract later.

But even when they’re wrong, hot takes can still serve an excellent purpose. I grew up in the age of the 24-hour news cycle, i.e. after Watergate, WWII, or any other event that kids assume I must have witnessed personally. I’ve become quite fond of a podcast on Watergate that follows aspects of the scandal in present tense — that is, they try to convey the uncertainty and novelty of an unfolding crisis, rather than presenting the events as unchangeable destiny.

You aren’t given the sense that right must prevail, that corruption will certainly be unveiled. You see the investigation as many see ongoing investigations right now. You don’t know who’s correct, let alone who will win. You follow the stories that are no longer considered central to the scandal, but at the time, looked as though they might be the undoing of powerful men. Listening gives you the sense of having stepped back 40 years in time.

Hot takes serve as an emotional and intellectual time capsule for the events they cover. They can be done within mere minutes of the start of a controversy, and their lack of context is a type of context. They can capture the prevailing initial public reaction or a minority view. Because they are done so quickly, first impressions shape them and are shaped by them.

In retrospect (which can happen as little as a day later), they show us the process of reacting to controversies, rather than giving us a sober, neat synopsis of events that didn’t look sober or neat when they were happening.

Hot takes can also come from people we’re not used to listening to. As an event unfolds, traditional news media can be slow to report, let alone comment. People who are near the center of a controversy or event can be the best resource for providing context, and they are usually not the experts we’re used to seeing on news commentary shows. While they don’t always have the polished vocabularies and credentials we expect, the authenticity and experience they bring are invaluable. Anybody looking to understand an issue needs access to the perspectives that these sorts of hot takes provide.

I’d describe my approach as a leftover take. I like to take note of my initial reactions, then look for context and consider other responses. I don’t dismiss my initial reaction. It has its own validity. But I like that reaction better when deepened and mellowed by additional information, and the time to reflect on what my initial reaction represents.

Takes are wonderful when hot and fresh, but the next day, when emotions and reasoning processes have melded, they form something you can enjoy for much longer.

Besides, anybody with a pile of laundry as large as the one in my house has no business trying to stay on top of anything else.

Nakia Jackson is a mom, musician and writer. From her first (terrible) story at age six to the ad copy and background music she sells to keep the family in yarn and Cheerios, creating has been her life’s breath. When not creating, Nakia enjoys family excursions designed to show the world that normal is merely a setting on the washing machine. Her column, Another Kind of Voice, is published in the last week of every month.

Previous Post

December 31, 2017

Good Muslim News Stories of 2017

Next Post

January 9, 2018 Time Running Out for DREAMers and the DACA Program

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who tricked Jacob into marrying Leah instead of Rachel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Reuben Laban Joseph Esau