Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
How a Trump Presidency Signaled the Death of Pragmatism and the Promise of Islamic Reform

How a Trump Presidency Signaled the Death of Pragmatism and the Promise of Islamic Reform

Last updated on: December 18, 2017 at 5:21 pm by Guest Contributor

How a Trump Presidency Signaled the Death of Pragmatism and the Promise of Islamic Reform 2017-12-18T17:21:12-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image source: Andalus Online

The Muslim Monad: Explorations in Identity, Philosophy and the Islamic “State” with Inas Younis

Fed up with the culture of pragmatic moral relativism, the religious right has been pushing for the integration of religion and politics since their inception. But it was not until an equally irrational force of Muslim extremists began making the same claims about religion and politics (without the civilized features of a moral majority style campaign) that the religious right began to wonder if they have been too well behaved in their entire approach.

And so, rather than remain culturally defensive, they have decided to become politically offensive and forgo pragmatism in governing. Hence the Trump presidency.

But what is pragmatism, and how does it help us understand American foreign policy decisions up until this administration?

Simply put, a pragmatist holds that whatever works is good and whatever doesn’t is bad. When your source of political guidance is not religion, pragmatism serves as a pretty decent substitute.

Although it was reason, not pragmatism, that established the principles of a free society, reason fell out of favor when pragmatism took over as a philosophical movement in the 1870s.

Reason, like religion, holds that there are absolute truths. But unlike religion, which relies on subjective human interpretations, it arrives at truths according to objective standards and maintains a strict adherence to certain absolutes. Pragmatism, on the other hand, holds that there are no absolutes, and right and wrong is determined according to what produces the best outcome.

The best outcome for whom, however, does not factor into the ethics of a pragmatist.

A pragmatic approach to policy can work politically but it does not work in principle, except to destroy all principles. Pragmatism is cynical with respect to objective principles of right and wrong. For a pragmatist, the “end always justifies the means,” and the driving force behind decisions is efficiency.

But a country like the United States, a country founded on a set of clearly defined principles and brought together under the banner of an ideology and not based on a shared ethnicity or culture, cannot survive without adhering to the foundational principles that became the basis of its moral and political legitimacy.

Preaching moralism while acting on the Machiavellian in the name of pragmatism has thrust this nation into Alice’s rabbit hole, where nonsense and common sense become interchangeable, and where anyone armed with a consistent ideology, no matter how perverse or dangerous, could inevitability gain a foothold.

From that perspective, Trump’s election was not an aberration but the natural progression of the moral bankruptcy of pragmatism. As pragmatism unravels, religion is now rushing in to stake its claims and assert its superiority.

Caught in the cross fires between this clash of anti-civilizations American Muslims are now seeking shelter behind the narrative that counters religious extremism with liberal leftist politics — a problematic approach given that the left is generally uncomfortable with religious language and tends to only act as a protection in so far as a we can remain powerless.

There is another option, and one that is completely consistent with our identities as Americans and Muslims. And it begins with the rhetoric of Islamic reform.

Islamic Reform Movements

Most religions start out puritanical and modernize over time. Islam took the opposite course. It started out flaming with liberalism. It granted its followers unprecedented freedoms and established a trajectory towards increasing freedoms by deconstructing the notion of religious authority acting as an intermediary between man and God, and it introduced the concept of ijtihad or independent reasoning as a legitimate and very critical part of Islamic jurisprudence. Islam was a religion built on the fluidity of ageless principles and was designed to evolve with the times.

It granted women property rights at time when women were themselves considered property. And, depending on time and place, non-Muslims sought the protection of the Muslim Ottomans because of the religious mandate to protect Christians and Jews from persecution.

This was the esprit de corps that led to the expansion of Islam until it was truncated by the so called “reform movements.” In the beginning of the 10th century many Sunni jurists began suppressing the process of independent reasoning and replaced it with an imitative approach that focused on the enforcement of limitations on thought and behavior.

This imitative approach (taqlid) to religious jurisprudence became the impetus for the growth of totalitarian movements like Wahhabism and its many extremist corollaries around the world. What started out as a stunted little sect in the deserts of Arabia has evolved into a major political force armed with a global curriculum.

Therefore, any modern reform efforts within Islam must start by undoing the corruptions perpetuated by that central governing body currently presiding over its holy sites — the Saudi religious establishment.

Reason is the Way Forward

Our goal as American Muslims is to restore our understanding of Islam as a religion where truth is not determined according to averages but in accordance with certain absolutes. And, our goal to accept that in politics, that truth is bound by the objective standards of reason and not the subjectivity of any religion.

What began as a pragmatic opposition to the political establishment by the right wing has rapidly deteriorated into open hatred for the “other.” Rather than returning to the American tradition of principled leadership and nonnegotiable ideals of individual rights and objective law, they are renouncing pragmatism for something far worse — radicalism.

The rise of the right wing from the fringes of society into the mainstream was, among other things, our nation’s suicidal response to Islamic extremism. One can only hope that this clamoring to take ownership of American values by renouncing the Americanism that has been our way of life, where individual rights are sacrosanct and where all men are created equal, will merely be a detour in our eventual restoration to the principles of reason.

Inas Younis

Reason is the only universal standard of political theory. Historically, reason has been the only approach in political philosophy which has ever worked and the only approach that is completely consistent with Islam and its universal call for justice.

Inas Younis is a Kansas City-based freelance writer and commentator. Her opinion pieces and personal essays have been published in various websites and magazines. Inas is an active volunteer in several interfaith initiatives and serves on the board of the Sisterhood of Salaam Shalom. She is also a contributor to a forthcoming 400-page community-led guide, aimed at mobilizing Muslims to take a stand against violent extremism and develop narratives of peace. Her work was featured in an anthology titled “Living Islam Out Loud.” Her column appears in Altmuslim during the first week of every month.

Follow her on Twitter and on Facebook.

Previous Post

August 1, 2017

Can (and Should) Islam be Reformed?

Next Post

August 9, 2017 #SelectiveSilence from the White House Regarding the Minnesota Mosque Bombing

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Job maintain throughout his speeches?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His guilt His innocence His wealth His silence