Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
#MuslimBan 2.0 Executive Order Goes from Seven to Six Countries

#MuslimBan 2.0 Executive Order Goes from Seven to Six Countries

Last updated on: March 6, 2017 at 7:23 pm by Guest Contributor

#MuslimBan 2.0 Executive Order Goes from Seven to Six Countries 2017-03-06T19:23:20-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By slowking4 – Own work, GFDL 1.2, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=55887861

By Dilshad D. Ali

After anticipating and analyzing for weeks what President Donald Trump’s new version of the travel #MuslimBan would entail, the 2.0 version was signed by the president today, removing Iraq from the original list of seven countries and listing more details regarding green card and visa holders.

Iraq has been removed from the original list of countries, which includes Syria, Sudan, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. Iraq was removed after an “intense review from the State Department to improve vetting of Iraqi citizens in collaboration with the Iraqi government.” Check out the full language of the executive order here.

In this CNN article, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said,

“The United States welcomes this kind of close cooperation,” he said. “This revised order will bolster the security of the united states and our allies.” … The new version exempts people who hold current visas and drops an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees, reducing it to 120 days. It also makes clear that lawful permanent residents are excluded from ban.

The administration is hoping the added details and language will stop a repeat of the chaos that ensued when the #MuslimBan was first dropped on January 27th and be upheld in court. Protesters, civil rights activists and lawyers flooded airports all over the United States to help travelers who were being refused entry, separated from family members and sent back to the countries they were flying from. In the following weeks, as various organizations and states challenged the ban in court and Attorney General Sally Yates was sacked after refusing to defend the presidents executive order, a plethora of reports emerged of visas being cancelled, secondary questioning, Canadian citizens being refused entry into the U.S. and U.S. citizens being detained for hours, among many other problems.

It was reported that even Gold Star father Khizr Khan cancelled a scheduled appearance in Toronto because his travel status was being scrutinized:

JUST IN: Gold Star father Khizr Khan cancels scheduled speech in Toronto after being told his “travel privileges are being reviewed.” pic.twitter.com/3dXFMnjced

— Rosa Hwang (@journorosa) March 6, 2017

So what has changed between the #MuslimBan 1.0 and 2.0?

Iraq has been removed from the list of seven countries targeted by the ban, and certain individuals from the six listed country are barred from entering the U.S. for 120 days.
The ban not just blocks Syrian refugees from entering the U.S. — all refugees are barred entry for that time period.
Syrian refugees are not banned indefinitely.
Current visa holders from the listed countries are exempt.
Green card holders are exempt from the ban.

The Trump administration is still arguing that this is not a Muslim ban, but rather a travel ban. However, it is a fact that Muslim-majority countries have been targeted and the president did say he would help Christian refugees from the listed countries. Muslim leaders, scholars, activists and everyday citizens have stated implicitly that this is a #MuslimBan. As articulated in this Vox article:

The case for calling Trump’s order a “Muslim ban” is pretty straightforward: It’s based on intention. In 2015, Donald Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslim immigration to the United States. The proposal morphed over the course of 2016 into a more legally defensible country-based ban. If the “country-based” stuff is really a fig leaf, the argument goes, then the public shouldn’t let the Trump administration get away with it.

Calling it a “Muslim ban” also makes sense if, in practice, the executive order would treat Muslims differently than members of other religions. The order banned most refugees from coming to the US for four months (before being put on hold by a federal judge), but allowed and even encouraged the US to bring in persecuted “religious minorities” — and President Trump has explicitly promised to help Christians in the Middle East. If the ban exempts Christians from certain countries, but affects their Muslim neighbors, that could create de facto discrimination.

Patheos Muslim blogger Khusro Khwaja Tariq wrote on Facebook that the new version of the ban is hardly better then the old one because:

The primary objection raised by Judge Roberts and the 9th circuit court of appeals was this: That the government has not proven that a sufficient terror threat exists from the nations included in the ban to justify violating fifth amendment rights.

Completely dismissing this, Trump has essentially repeated the same executive order. Despite the provision of a seven-day grace period, the most likely outcome will be yet more chaos at the airports followed by litigation and reversal of this executive order by a court.

This chaos at portals of entry is in itself a security threat. The security of citizens is not, and never was a consideration of Trump and his backers. This is Trump making America less safe, not more. This is populism and ultranationalism on full display. Trump is pandering to the same base he appealed to in the elections. This is Trump and the GOP preparing for 2020. Normalizing, promoting and turning bigotry into a political weapon.

Or, as Affinis Lab Creative Director (and former Altmuslim associate editor) Wajahat Ali said,

A ham sandwich without the mayonnaise is still a ham sandwich. Similarly, the new travel ban is just like the old travel ban – which is and always will be a Muslim ban.

Don’t be fooled.

It’s ineffective (won’t work according to DHS which did an intelligence report on it last week), counter productive (which means it’ll make matters worse and alienate allies and be used as propoganda and recruitment for ISIS), cruel (we’re targeting innocent students, families, refugees and potential employees), and most likely unconstitutional (we know his anti-Muslim intent and sentinment).

Oh, also Russia. Don’t forget Russia amidst all this mess.

Added Shabana Mir, assistant professor at American Islamic College in Chicago, “Please do not let scholars, pundits, news media frame the Muslim Ban 2.0 as somehow better or gentler. Its sneakiness and this framing make it more dangerous. Also, don’t let that framing make you forget: It’s still a Muslim Ban.”

President Donald Trump

Previous Post

March 3, 2017

Between Disengagement and Changing Paradigms - A New Path for America's Mosques

Next Post

March 9, 2017 How do Honor Killings and Women's Rights Factor into the #MuslimBan 2.0?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wrote of a new covenant where God's law would be written not on stone but where?

Select your answer to see how you score.

In a book On their hearts On scrolls In the temple