Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
Why #MyJihad Doesn’t Engage with Islamophobes Like Pamela Geller

Why #MyJihad Doesn’t Engage with Islamophobes Like Pamela Geller

Last updated on: April 12, 2013 at 9:07 pm by Guest Contributor

Why #MyJihad Doesn’t Engage with Islamophobes Like Pamela Geller 2013-04-12T21:07:53-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Angie Emara

I am writing this as an opportunity to clarify the misconceptions, misreporting and misunderstanding surrounding the #MyJihad campaign, of which, I am the project coordinator and essentially lead day-in and da- out. And night. And in my dreams. So really, not many others can give you the straight deal on this campaign like I can, save a few others who work tirelessly on this brilliant, groundbreaking movement.

Davi Barker, who blogs at The Muslim Agorist and writes for The Examiner and Altmuslim, wrote a piece in which he analyzed a debate noted Islamophobe Pamela Geller had with Michael Krasney opposite David Chiu, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and Jess Ghannam, a professor from UCSF and director of the Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee of San Francisco.

In the article, Barker stated that Gellar won the debate and that #MyJihad should’ve engaged her. I have several problems with his article.

First, there are several incorrect statements Barker makes regarding our campaign. Each of our official ads was carefully selected and feature real, personal jihads. My ad highlights how I lost my son before his fifth birthday. So the nonsense quotes Barker says are examples of our official ads are wrong. While he does make clear that #MyJihad is not a CAIR project, most of all, it is especially not a national CAIR project.

#MyJihad is an entirely grass roots project, conceived by Ahmed Rehab (who is Executive Director of CAIR-Chicago) and carried out by everyday regular citizens like myself. In fact, three of our most active volunteers of the “core team” are mothers.

What is #MyJihad?

Let me back up and explain this idea of grass roots even further. My son Amir, who is 11, is growing up in a time where he is asked every so often if he is a terrorist like Osama bin Laden — because he is Muslim. Our children are growing up in a time unlike any of us previously experienced. They are defending themselves and explaining things that have nothing to do with them simply because they are of a particular faith.

This is one of the catalysts for the #MyJihad campaign. Ahmed Rehab will tell you that he came up with this campaign because of the reaction Muslims were having to being called “savages” rather than being outraged at the misuse of the word Jihad. Thus was born the #MyJihad campaign.

Finally we have a platform for the average Muslim that isn’t affiliated with anything political or overtly religious — just a place where we can present ourselves as we are, how we live daily and finally be heard. So that I, my son, Sadaf Syed’s kids, Yasmina Blackburn’s kids (all helping with the campaign) and so on, don’t have to continually repeat ourselves over and over in trying to be heard over the loud sounds and seen over the images plastered on buses and in selective media.

Where Barker Got it Wrong

Mr. Barker thinks we should respond to people who are purposely hijacking and misusing our words and our faith. Well, Mr. Barker, that is precisely what our #MyJihad campaign is doing; however, we owe no one any proof as to who we are and what we believe. He tries to make the argument that since a radio station offered the platform for a hate group to speak, #MyJihad volunteers must address it.

Let’s be real. Media loves controversy. They love a good fight. Is Barker really insisting that we entertain that? Just because you throw two guys into a ring and tell them to fight, are they obligated to fight? To properly debate a topic, the two sides must be opposing yes, but equal in credibility. They need to both have some kind of valid platform or grounds to stand on. By these standards, Geller is and never will be qualified to debate us or our campaign.

Geller and her clan are no authority on Islam, Muslims, or even people of faith for that matter. She pulls quotes out of context, uses extremists for her examples and flat out lies in many cases (which we have investigated and proven, by the way.) Her motives are completely political. #MyJihad is a social platform. You can’t equate the two. So, of all people, we certainly owe people like Geller no explanations.

Wrote Barker: “The fact is CAIR was the right opponent for this debate, if for no other reason than because it’s being misreported that #MyJihad was CAIR’s campaign.”

Wrong. CAIR and even CAIR-Chicago, have no ownership over #MyJihad. Just because some media and people like Geller purposely misreport that it’s a CAIR campaign, we need to perpetuate this false idea by having them play the role? I’m sorry, but there is no logic in such a statement. Additionally, #MyJihad is a global, grassroots campaign, meaning anyone, anywhere can take part in their own way. That CAIR-SF chose to refuse the radio show with Geller was their own choice and independent of the #MyJihad campaign.

Wrote Barker*: “The role of someone debating Geller is to get her to expose her true intentions in her own words, because she will never answer that question outright.”*

Bingo. So why on Earth, Mr. Barker, would we ever entertain the idea of debating such a person one-on-one if she will never answer outright? Clearly, addressing Geller or any of the Islamophobes, will be fruitless. They aren’t out to debate. They aren’t out to understand, nor are they even open to the possibility of hearing reality or facts. Such people are hate mongers with a narrow agenda, part of which is to be heard and paid for it. #MyJihad will never contribute to that.

Dear Mr. Barker, #MyJihad is not (and never will be) out to oppose Geller or the likes of her. #MyJihad is out to reclaim the use and meaning of the term Jihad to its proper form, as practiced by millions of Muslims around the world, from both Muslim and anti-Muslim extremists who have misused it. We aren’t going to do this one-by-one. No. We ARE tackling our goal as a movement. A grassroots movement where we rise above those who attack us and misrepresent us — not battle them head on — much like the meaning of Jihad itself actually. We don’t stoop to these extremists’ levels. We present ourselves proudly and with conviction. And thankfully, we ARE succeeding.

Angie Emara is the project coordinator for MyJihad Inc.

Previous Post

April 10, 2013

In the War of the Billboards, Islamophobe Pamela Gellar is Winning

Next Post

April 18, 2013 Lord, Be My Witness - The Irrationality of Shia-Sunni Violence

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE