Human rights: Sakineh’s case & beyond

Last updated on: October 8, 2010 at 9:08 am by Rafia Zakaria

Human rights: Sakineh’s case & beyond 2010-10-08T09:08:03-04:00 Rafia Zakaria

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The punishment is the crime

Sakineh Ashtiani’s name is now well known across the world. The 42-year-old mother of two was convicted of murder and adultery in Iran. She has been on death row in Iran since 2006. This year, an international campaign was started by her children to prevent her execution. Some reports alleged that because of her conviction for adultery, Sakineh would be stoned to death. Appeals have been issued by international human rights organisations around the world and the petition to ‘Free Sakineh’ counts international celebrities among its signatories.

On Sept 8, 2010 Ramin Mehmanparast, a spokesperson for the Iranian government, confirmed that the Iranian government had suspended the stoning sentence but retained the option of carrying out the execution through other methods.

In the media blitz accompanying his attendance at the UN General Assembly, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad defended Sakineh Ashtiani’s case by deflecting attention towards the impending execution of a woman (subsequently put to death) in America. In a statement he said: “A woman is being executed in the United States for murder but nobody protests against it.”

Ahmadinejad’s strategy of justifying the execution of one woman by pointing to another is an old one. World leaders routinely point to the existence of injustice in other countries as an argument for visiting a variety of abuse on their own populations with callous impunity. In Muslim countries especially, the existence of injustice in western countries seem to function as a convenient argument for their excesses.

On the international front, however, the case of Sakineh Ashtiani and the use of stoning punishments have generated vociferous condemnations. The barbarity of the act of stoning, captured in a recent film entitled The Stoning of Soraya, has led many to conclude that Islam unequivocally condones such punishments.

Such perceptions, based on cases like Sakineh’s, present an urgent and pressing challenge to theology and to Muslims committed to preventing the hijacking of their faith for political objectives pursued by a variety of rulers. While many Muslims have signed the petition to free Sakineh Ashtiani their anti-stoning arguments have remained couched in western human rights principles rather than Islamic theological arguments.

This paradigm is now being taken up by an emerging movement led by Muslim women who seek to challenge the presentation of practices like stoning as unarguable and unchallengeable practices of Islamic law. The Musawah movement, initiated in March 2007 by a Malaysian NGO called Sisters in Islam, seeks to challenge inequality and issues like stoning under the framework of Islam.

As its guiding principle the movement which includes female Muslim activists from Iran, Nigeria, the United States, Malaysia and scores of other countries declares that “we as Muslims declare that equality and justice in the family are both necessary and possible. We hold the principles of Islam to be a source of justice and equality, fairness and dignity for all human beings. The time for realising these values in our laws and practices is now”.

In a conference held in February last year, Musawah founder Zainah Anwar, describing the challenge said, “very often Muslim women who demand justice and want to change discriminatory laws are told ‘this is God’s law’ and therefore not open to negotiation and change”. She went on to assert that justice is a central and intrinsic principle in Islam and that Muslim women will no longer be silenced by attacks in their quest to achieve justice and equality.

With respect to the use of stoning as a punishment for adultery, a prominent Islamic feminist scholar Ziba Mir-Hosseini associated with Musawah recently published a critique of stoning laws based on Islamic theology. In her paper, published on the Musawah website and entitled “Criminalising sexuality: Zina laws as violence against women in Muslim contexts” Mir-Hosseini locates Zina crimes at the intersection between “religion culture and law”.

She argues that practices like stoning must thus be challenged on a variety of levels including theological challenges, larger widespread understandings of women as property and relationships to other laws and legal mechanisms that promote that women must always acquiesce in the leadership of male guardians. One important mechanism in doing so is to recognise that several of these precepts emanate from fiqh or juristic pronouncements made by legal scholars but are nevertheless presented as divine and unassailable.

A theological argument against stoning is also provided by University of Wisconsin law professor Asifa Quraishi in her recent paper Who says Sharia demands stoning of women?, Prof. Quraishi presents a detailed discussion of the plurality within Islamic law to demonstrate that those that argue that ‘stoning’ is a necessary element of Sharia are relying on incorrect presumptions that all of Sharia is in fact divinely ordained.

In presenting the plural sources of Islamic fiqh, therefore, Quraishi highlights that difference of opinion and diversity, particularly in legislative fiqh, such as the laws governing ‘stoning’, is an essential part of Islamic jurisprudence. Given this, it is a gross misrepresentation to say that supporting ‘stoning’ punishments is part of being a believing Muslim and believing in Sharia and also consequently believing that opposing Sharia is essential to women’s rights.

The argument made by the Musawah movement and these scholars thus is multifaceted. First distinctions must be made between Sharia as the ‘revealed way’ and Islamic fiqh or the science of Islamic jurisprudence. Second, as said by Qasim bin Jawziyya, an Islamic jurist in the seventh century, “the fundamentals of Sharia are rooted in wisdom and promotion of welfare of human beings in this life and the Hereafter. Sharia embraces justice, kindness, the common good and wisdom”. Given these tools, it is certainly possible to formulate fiqh-based arguments that oppose stoning and any other barbaric punishment from within both an Islamic and a human rights framework.

The presence of stoning punishments for sexual crimes in the law books of Muslim countries and the lack of challenges posed to them from within Islam are a cause for urgent concern for all Muslims. Not only do existing discussions promote misperceptions about religious law to dupe the ignorant but also use this as a basis for political theatre rather than as a tool of justice. Movements like Musawah and the work of emerging Muslims scholars can provide Muslims with the tools to distinguish between faith and propaganda.

Rafia Zakaria is Associate Editor of altmuslim.com and an attorney who teaches constitutional history and political philosophy. This article was previously published in Dawn (Pakistan).

Briefings

Previous Post

October 6, 2010

India's Babri Masjid: A verdict built on historical half-truths

Next Post

October 11, 2010 Media: Is there an antidote for anti-Muslim rhetoric?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years did it take Solomon to build his palace?

Select your answer to see how you score.

10 years 7 years 15 years 13 years