Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

altmuslim

Home
Muslim
Pakistan: Let’s be friends, not frenemies

Pakistan: Let’s be friends, not frenemies

Last updated on: August 2, 2010 at 4:00 pm by Guest Contributor

Pakistan: Let’s be friends, not frenemies 2010-08-02T16:00:19-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re staying, thank you

This May, I traveled all over Pakistan for two weeks as a part of a State Department public diplomacy program aimed at addressing anti-American sentiment taking control of the country. As a part of the State Department’s International Visitors Program, I was able to meet with leading academics, NGOs, and students in Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi.

Although the aim of my program was to talk about the American Muslim identity and women’s rights in Islam, I spent the majority of my time talking about a woman named Aafia Siddiqui, the mistreatment of Pakistanis at American airports, drone attacks, and a general barrage of frustrations with U.S. foreign policy.

I’ll be honest – people in Pakistan are outraged. The minute I told people I was an American born Muslim of Indian-descent, people’s expressions would visibly change from intrigue to anger. I was politely told at a leading think tank in Lahore, “Madam, you are affiliated with two of Pakistan’s greatest enemies – India and America.” Ouch.

It’s definitely an understatement to say that America has an image problem in Pakistan. However, I found that one of the only viable means to fix this problem is through public diplomacy. The role of public diplomacy in advancing foreign policy has often been considered a weak tool, but my experience suggests it may be the best one we have.

The Pakistani media, like ours, is constantly on the lookout for ways to fill the 24-hour news cycle. And, unfortunately, a fair bit of what makes for good television are talk shows stocked with conspiracy theories. This leads to a widespread distrust of the U.S., thereby making changing the hearts and minds of people a battle.

While it’s true that some conspiracy theories actually coincide with legitimate grievances, they make it incredibly difficult for Pakistanis to trust anyone from the U.S. Therefore, the dynamic that is created during a face-to-face conversation is perhaps one of the most effective tools to counter these myths. It is very difficult to call someone a liar when they’re standing in front of you (and drinking your tea). By honestly listening to grievances, and acknowledging mistakes made in the past, America will mitigate its public diplomacy problems and make the national security problems of the future perhaps a bit less daunting.

Young people, kheema, and iPhones

One interesting phenomenon I found when talking to young people in Pakistan was their tendency to separate President Obama from his policies. They admire President Obama’s struggle, his diverse background, and find him intelligent, articulate and sometimes even inspiring. And, perhaps more simply, they see in him someone who may not exactly understand their lives, but makes a concerted effort to do so. A college student who was cynical of nearly everything the U.S. does in his country was still excited by the possibility of a U.S. President who, thanks to a Pakistani college roommate, can cook Pakistani food, citing reports that President Obama can make kheema (ground beef) and daal (lentils). Admittedly, it’s not a breakthrough in international public opinion, but it’s certainly positive opinion that the U.S. cannot ignore.

However, many Pakistanis feel that there is a disconnect between President Obama and his policies. From the Pakistani perspective, drone attacks are still taking place, and U.S. military pressure has increased over the last several months. I was told repeatedly that the war Pakistanis were fighting against the Taliban was not their war. Instead, it was described (with some contempt) as America’s war, and this phrase would inevitably be the next question: “What have we gotten in return?” This would usually degenerate into a full-blown tirade about the origins of the Taliban and the U.S. support of the mujahideen in Afghanistan, to which I never knew how to respond.

Similarly, when I asked a group of young aspiring Pakistani politicians (Pakistan’s Youth Parliament) about their views on the U.S., the word that was repeated most often was “hypocrisy” (I counted – it was used 9 times). There are valid reasons for believing that Pakistan is not treated as an equal on the diplomatic stage by the United States. However, I made a point to emphasize that the reinvigorated US-Pakistan Strategic Dialogue covers a range of social and economic issues, moving the conversation between the U.S. and Pakistan beyond only the national security context. While there were definitely skeptics in the room, there were also a good number of people who were hopeful that this partnership would yield positive long-term results.

Just like young people anywhere in the world, the youth in Pakistan are concerned about educational standards, job opportunities, and the national security of Pakistan. At the same time, they also love rock music, hanging out at coffee shops, and are addicted to Facebook. Alongside some young people who are disaffected and angry are those who admire the freedoms and technological advances in America. In fact, a young man named Abdul was in disbelief when I told him that I don’t own an iPhone, “But you live in America!” he exclaimed.

The unique thing about young people anywhere is that they’re able to look beyond difficult political situations, yet feel hopeful for the future. This is definitely true among the Pakistani youth I met, which included students from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds, including elite institutions in Karachi to a madrassa in a Lahore slum. Indeed, as an articulate but angry student at one of the prominent law schools in Lahore told me after 15 minutes of complaining about U.S. foreign policy in Palestine that, “If anyone can fix the situation that Muslims are in today, it’s President Obama.” Throughout my trip, I never heard this sort of optimism among an older generation.

It’s also worth noting that Pakistanis are an incredibly proud people. A girl named Uzma made it clear to me that while she could speak perfect English, she would purposefully ask her questions in formal Urdu to stress the importance of Pakistan’s national language. I once asked a group of college-aged students if they would ever want to move to the United States, thinking that would all say yes. Not one raised her hand. While they would want to study at American colleges, they made is clear that their generation does not want to participate in the Pakistani brain drain. Not only was this national pride endearing, but it made me hopeful for the upcoming youth being raised in a turbulent Pakistan. Understanding this pride and engaging Pakistanis on a person-to-person level is imperative for future American public diplomacy initiatives.

Pakistani youth should be America’s target demographic for increased public diplomacy initiatives. These are the people who are working to build stronger institutions in Pakistan, and dream of a stable, democratic Pakistan. Not only are they listening and engaging, but they are trying to provide constructive solutions to address the issues that they face. But usually no one is listening. While this demographic makes up an unprecedented amount of the population in Pakistan, there are very few outlets and programs designated for the civic and political development of young people. One of the most important things that the U.S. can do is to listen to and support these voices.

Public diplomacy: It’s better face-to-face

Pakistani public opinion is based on real problems – limited electricity, dwindling water supplies, corrupt institutions, and terrorism – just to name a few. The perceived lack of U.S. empathy towards the plight of developing world problems is a dilemma – perhaps one driven by the fact that we ourselves seldom focus on the good work the U.S. is doing. Wars draw more attention than humanitarian aid, but in a country that knows devastating poverty, reminders of times when the U.S. has offered a helping hand go a very long way. While I made a point to remind people in Pakistan that Americans gave the most amount of humanitarian aid after the 2005 earthquake, it is important to be clear and forthcoming about informing people that humanitarian aid is a reflection of American values.

One of my successes was to address the mystique around the lives of Muslims in America. Talking about shared values, cultures, and religion, created a space where I was able to authentically explain U.S. policies. The minute I started talking about what a big fan I am of the Pakistani rock band Junoon, eyes lit up around the room. I had to repeat several times that I listen to Pakistani music, enjoy Pakistani food, and wear Pakistani clothes – yes, in America.

Public diplomacy is difficult because it never quite ends. It’s an obstacle that is overcome face-to-face, one person at a time. While using new media is a great mechanism for reaching larger audiences, tools such as Facebook can work when there is some underlying sense of trust. Vague messages and statements on behalf of the U.S. government do not work in an environment of mistrust and serve to only frustrate people further. Our government can definitely do more to effectively communicate and explain American policies. This happens through international visits and face-to-face encounters.

I came away realizing that Pakistani anger at the U.S. is not permanent. Upgraded and better-funded public diplomacy initiatives can and will make a difference. American public diplomacy officers are at the forefront of this fight, and hopefully their jobs will get a bit easier due to Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Holbrooke’s commitment to dedicate more assets to public diplomacy programs in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The point of all of this isn’t for the U.S. to please everyone. To do so would be futile and disingenuous. However, we can provide better explanations and offer more concrete tools for engagement and interaction. It could be a long struggle, and we’ll certainly need to make more friends in Pakistan along the way.

Safiya most recently served as the South Asia policy analyst at the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). Prior to USCIRF, Safiya served as the Government Relations Director for the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) in the Washington DC office. Safiya can be reached at sjghori[at]gmail.com

Commentary

Previous Post

July 30, 2010

Book "The Butterfly Mosque": We are all on the mountaintop

Next Post

August 4, 2010 Park51: Choosing freedom over fear

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was a biblical measurement of a span?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Third of a cubit Quarter cubit Full cubit Half a cubit