Public relations: A new approach to Muslim outreach

Last updated on: May 7, 2010 at 6:45 am by Guest Contributor

Public relations: A new approach to Muslim outreach 2010-05-07T06:45:45-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The old approach

As part of its outreach efforts aimed at Muslims, the Obama administration has created the Office of Special Representative to Muslim Communities. An office in the State Department, the initiative is part of President Obama’s efforts to build bridges with Muslim countries and create dialogue with Muslims abroad. But in light of this weekend’s Times Square bomb plot thought to have been perpetrated by an American citizen of Pakistani descent, is this administration directing its efforts in the right place? Or should it perhaps prioritize the communities to which it reaches out? With alarming reports of terrorist plots unfolding in its very own backyard, it may be time to consider whether this administration would be better off focusing its outreach efforts on the American Muslim community rather than Muslim communities overseas.

Although details of the suspected bomber’s life and contacts are only slowly coming out, understanding what motivated him is crucial not just for the government in its counterterrorism efforts, but also for the American Muslim community, which has the most to lose by this development.

The American Muslim community is estimated at about 1.4 million and consists of first, second, and third generations of immigrant Muslims from diverse ethnic backgrounds (PDF). These individuals, or their parents or grandparents, have struggled to leave behind their homes and adopt a new language and culture, all while trying to find their place in a new society. But do the recent cases of home-grown terrorism have the potential to threaten their progress? The most damning bits of evidence in the recent case were that the suspect was well-educated, had a decent job, and was a naturalized U.S. citizen. The questions most American Muslims will ask is whether this evidence has the potential to put everyone, even well-adjusted immigrants, under the cloud of suspicion.

Thus, American Muslims have a large stake in how the facts surrounding the would-be bomber will shape opinions about their community. For the American Muslim community, this perception is even more critical in light of the direction the Muslim diaspora has taken in Europe. Increasingly radicalized and marginalized to the fringe of society, European Muslims continue to struggle to find their place in European countries, but are often faced with negative responses. So far, American Muslims have had the luxury of feeling comfortable that their community has been more successful at integrating. But it is events like these – American Muslim citizens acting out violently and hoping to aid foreign terrorist groups – that have the potential to cause the American Muslim community to fear that their relative success at integration could soon be threatened.

The fact that the individuals in the past three domestic terrorism cases have been successful and educated American citizens is also alarming because it throws what we previously thought we understood about the roots of terrorism out the window: theories relating to poverty and a lack of alternative and meaningful opportunities for education and advancement appear to make no sense when applied to these individuals. These may just be isolated incidents of individuals with personality issues. In that event, it would be difficult to identify a trend and formulate a means to address it. But if they are not isolated events, we must ask ourselves, what is motivating these American Muslim citizens to seek out foreign terrorist groups with hopes of aiding them? Is it a result of increasing alienation or not feeling part of the society in which one lives? Is it retaliation or retribution for what they view as the foreign policy atrocities of the United States? Perhaps it is a combination of these factors. Addressing them will require a combination of tools aimed at integration and dispelling ignorance.

Even mere public relations efforts by the Obama administration to bring Muslims into the fold of American society – to show that Muslims are accepted and appreciated as part of this country’s fabric – could go a long way to dispel myths Muslims abroad (and perhaps some here at home) have that Muslims do not have a place in this country. The government must work to increasingly integrate Muslims and dispel that myth so violent actions like these will no longer make sense to those looking for a target for their anger. Individuals will be less likely to act out violently against others if they feel they would be harming people with whom they share a common affiliation and kinship.

Criticism of America’s foreign policy, such as the “retaliation” for drone attacks in Pakistan that was cited in the Times Square case, is another argument, however, and one that’s more difficult to tackle. But somewhere along the way, the suspected Times Square bomber thought his was an acceptable way to express his foreign policy grievances. It is this notion that the American Muslim community and the government are going to have to work together to dispel. If American Muslims have gripes about foreign policy, maybe the opportunity to discuss these issues will show that at least this country’s leadership is willing to listen to that segment of its constituency. Working on bringing Muslims into the fold and into that discussion might be this administration’s best bet at combating the potential alienation of American Muslims that will prove to be crucial in this war on terrorism.

But what may prove to be even more effective is a public coordination of efforts between the government and the American Muslim community to root out these violent crimes. American Muslim communities have worked with law enforcement in counterterrorism efforts in the past. Such cooperation would go a long way to show that violent actions are not sanctioned or condoned by the American Muslim community and that individuals who choose to act violently will not be able to count on finding sympathy or support from their community. The best chance at bringing the American Muslim community and the government together is by more publicized efforts by the Obama administration to reach out to American Muslims. The good news is that the Obama administration has already taken steps toward creating that vehicle. It is just a matter of refocusing the priority in his Muslim outreach campaign to the American Muslim community.

(Photo: Jason Kuffer)

Sanaa Ansari received her J.D. from the Howard University School of Law in Washington, D.C. She has previously worked on American Muslim civil rights issues and currently works for the Virginia judiciary.

Briefings

Previous Post

May 5, 2010

Franklin Graham: Hearing can prevent smearing

Next Post

May 10, 2010 Niqab: Cover up, your hatred is showing

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did Daniel survive with?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bears Lions Leopards Wolves