Foreign Policy: It’s time for action, President Obama

Last updated on: September 16, 2009 at 3:30 am by Guest Contributor

Foreign Policy: It’s time for action, President Obama 2009-09-16T03:30:00-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Thinking about acting

That President Obama has changed the character of the discourse towards the Muslim World is now old news. He conjures themes of reconciliation and mutual respect and eschews discussions of hate and fear. He talks of dialogue and diplomacy and avoids threats. It has been noted and rewarded. He is easily the most popular leader in the Muslim World and anti-Americanism has experienced palpable decline since his election.

While the fear that the US may invade another Muslim country has receded there is still anger and resentment at the US for its military operations in Iraq and Afpak and its support for Israel. Intellectuals and politicians do recognize that President Obama by using a new language has ignited hope that US-Muslim relations will change. But there is lingering skepticism. There are those who say, “perhaps the packaging has changed but the contents remain the same.”

President Obama however has gone beyond changing the language of US foreign policy; he has also changed its posture towards the Muslim World. Here are two examples. President Obama and his team have repeatedly insisted the Israeli settlements in the West Bank are not helpful to the peace process and must be halted. This is not a change in policy; this was US policy all along. The only change is that a US administration is willing to assert this even in the face of a public disagreement with the Israeli government.

A more significant change in posture underpins President Obama’s approach towards Iran. His insists that the US will leave no diplomatic stone unturned in an effort to persuade Iran to abandon its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. The recent decision to accept Iran’s invitation for direct talks even after it refused to discuss its nuclear program speaks volumes about America’s new posture towards Iran.

Most analysts in the Muslim World are not giving President Obama due credit for the changes he has brought to American foreign policy towards the Muslim World. They acknowledge that he speaks differently but they are still waiting to see if he acts differently.

These skeptics must realize that both language and posture in foreign policy cannot be altered without significant adjustments. The reason why President Obama is able to speak in a different language and adopt a different posture is primarily because he has a different vision of America’s presence on the world stage. Yes, he wants America to be secure, preeminent and influential globally, but unlike his predecessor he wishes to secure these goals by rebuilding the culture of multilateralism, restoring faith in American diplomacy and deploying respect rather than arrogance as a medium of international exchange.

He wants America to work in concert with other nations in pursuit of common goals and not bully them to advance self-interests at the expense of others. Nevertheless there is demand for action both at home and abroad; especially against states that are defying US and refusing to comply with its demands.

There is a strong constituency in the US and Europe that feels that Iran is getting closer to a nuclear weapon and every delay helps it in its relentless pursuit. They feel that Iran is going to use dialogue as a ploy to buy time. This constituency feels that unless the US acts soon either Iran will go nuclear or Israel will take matters in its own hands and attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. Either scenario will lead to the destabilization of the Middle East and according to most analysts a spurt in radicalism and terrorism.

Iran is not the only state in the Middle East defying the US. Israel too has for months refused to comply with US demands to stop building Jewish settlements on Palestinian land. Israel’s refusal has become a major impediment to the peace process since the Palestinians feel that settlements are altering facts on the ground.

The Arab world shares Israeli and US concerns about Iranian nuclear ambitions, but is waiting to see how the US deals with Israeli defiance. They too are demanding action; either Israel stops or the US makes it stop.

If the US punishes one defiance and rewards the other; the hypocrisy may escape observation in the US but in the Middle East it will signal the return of the Bush-Cheney America – hypocritical, unreliable and untrustworthy. The gains made by President Obama’s eloquence and positive overtures towards the Muslim World will be lost.

The point is simple, President Obama; talk is good and good talk is necessary and helpful, but ultimately what matters is action.

Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware and a Fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

Commentary

Muqtedar Khan

Previous Post

September 14, 2009

Author Dave Eggers: “Something tangible and beneficial can come out of this”

Next Post

September 18, 2009 Ramadan: Better than a thousand months

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Moses" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gifted Drawn Out (of water) Rescued Born Amid Trouble