Radovan Karadžić arrest: Not justice, but politics

Last updated on: July 24, 2008 at 6:00 pm by Guest Contributor

Radovan Karadžić arrest: Not justice, but politics 2008-07-24T18:00:00-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Hiding on stage

He was captured on Bus 83 from New Belgrade to Brussels, a bespectacled man with a wild, gray mane. Serb authorities had kept him under surveillance for weeks, waiting for the right opening and the least resistance. And after a decade-long search, Radovan Karadžić, sought for his leadership in the brutal ethnic cleansing of Bosnian Muslims and Croats, had been arrested.

Headlines broke in minutes. His capture was heralded as “justice,” as a “new page for Serbia.” Serge Brammertz, chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, declared it “an important day for international justice because it clearly demonstrates that nobody is beyond the reach of the law and that sooner or later all fugitives will be brought to justice.” Paddy Ashdown, the former EU high representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, said it was “a great piece of justice for Bosnia and… an extremely important piece of justice for the world at large.”

Is it?

Since the arrest and Hague trial of former Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic in 2002, the United Nations and the European Union have placed immense pressure on Serbia to comply with the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, a court that much of Serbia’s nationalist leadership refuses to acknowledge as legitimate. In the timeline of Serbia’s rocky history, the leadership has gone from attempting to fulfill the requirements of admission to the EU to breaking ties with the EU, and now back again.

Since his first election in 2004, pro-EU President Boris Tadić has had difficulty pushing his agenda to bring Serbia out of isolation, primarily because his parliament is split between his progressive party and the Radical Nationalist Party of his presidential opponent, Tomislav Nikolić. So, it came as no surprise when in 2006, the EU suspended talks to integrate Serbia until the government complied with the ICTY by, among other things, handing over both Karadžić and his Bosnian military commander Ratko Mladić. While Serbian politics remain convoluted, the bottom line is that Tadić’s party, along with just over half of the Serbian population, seeks entry into the EU, whereas Nikolic’s and other nationalist parties do not. In May’s parliamentary elections, however, the Serbian progressive and nationalist coalitions reached a stalemate that favored Tadić’s pro-EU party. And scant weeks after that political impasse, Karadžić showed up.

In context, then, is it really so surprising that Karadžić has suddenly been captured? He was disguised for years, working as a doctor of alternative medicine and writing for health magazines. He was barely recognizable and impossible to find for over a decade and yet, when the timing was right, he was captured.

In a way, the capture is monumental: it is the breakdown of the iconic significance of Karadžić’s freedom and the end of a chapter wherein entire networks of military, intelligence and political agents pulled the strings behind Serb policy. When Prime Minister Zoran Đinđić turned over Milosevic in 2002, he was assassinated less than a year later, ostensibly by these Milosevic-era networks. Tadić, at least, seems to be functioning with a bit more support—though, judging by the riots in Belgrade, the Serbian people still worship their old president.

This week, the pressure has been on Serbia to capture Mladic. Serbia has also just announced that it will be re-instating its ambassadors in EU nations that recognized Kosovo—a major concession that will no doubt expedite its entry into the union.

Given the circumstances surrounding Karadžić’s arrest, then, it hardly seems appropriate to call the capture “justice” when, until this point, all evidence pointed to the harboring of fugitives by a taciturn Serbian government and authorities. “How can the most powerful alliance in the world tell us that they can’t find two Serbs?” said Jacques Klein six years ago, as coordinator of the UN mission to Bosnia. Clearly, the search was only in earnest when a pro-EU government decided that admission into the European Union was worth sacrificing the man whom so many Serbs still consider a nationalist hero.

So why the lofty ideas of justice floating around? Why the tossing about of this word, heavy with import; why the praise heaped upon Serbia, a country that, in essence, turned over a war criminal when she found it in her best interest? Surely we jest. The leveraging of Karadžić’s capture to gain entry into the EU is not justice; it’s politics. But perhaps the bell-ringing and back-patting is the result of what had been, until a few days ago, an embarrassment to an international community that remained impotent during the Bosnian war—an international community that now seeks to atone for its malfeasance by burying the hatchet beneath feel-good concepts like “justice,” “truth” and “reconciliation.”

The conflict between Serbia and Bosnia, like so many, is portrayed in rigid terms that undermine the complexity of the decisions made in both Sarajevo and Belgrade. Yes, the Bosnian Muslims were aware that they would suffer casualties under their plan for armed secession; they were warned by Karadžić several times that their fate would be “one hundred times worse [than that of Croatia]” and would “bring about the disappearance of the Muslim nation”. But the brutality that took place in Srebrenica, the ongoing terror presided over by Karadžić and Mladić, was completely unexpected.

The idea of sympathetic intervention was not irrational. After all, when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, President George H.W. Bush decreed that “aggression would not stand” in the “new world order.” A UN-authorized military force then expelled Iraqi forces, lending credibility to Bush’s claim. When, in April 1991, a Kurd rebellion prompted a genocidal attack by Iraq, the United States deployed a humanitarian military intervention into Iraq to protect the Kurds and, indeed, help them acquire autonomy.

In 1992, a UN Protection Force for Croatia was stationed in Sarajevo. Most significantly, the US encouraged the European Community to recognize Bosnia’s independence regardless of whether Bosnian leadership accepted the soft partition plan, even going so far as to encourage the relatively defenseless Muslims to reject the plan. So even in 1993, when international mediators drafted a peace accord that granted concessions all around, the Bosnian leadership rejected it, positive that the United States and the United Nations would yet come to their aid.

In reality, it was a bluff — an attempt by the United States to gather Bosnian backing and prevent Serb aggression — and it failed at great cost. As the European Community’s negotiator, Jose Cutileiro, said “President Izetbegović and his aides were encouraged to scupper that [cantonization] deal and to fight for a unitary Bosnian state by well-meaning outsiders who thought they knew better.” Despite the questionable decisions on all sides, the fact remains that the United States and the United Nations were instrumental in the Bosnian decision to reject the peaceful Belgrade Initiative and victimize its civilians.

Fifteen years later, a hearing at an international court in the Netherlands hardly constitutes justice — neither on the part of Serbian military and political authorities, nor on the part of the international community. At best, it may be a start. Radovan Karadžić is a man indicted for crimes against humanity and genocide, and while his capture, however belated, may be a step forward, implying that it signifies justice is an insult to lives lost. It would serve us well to remember that justice is rarely ever a mere legal term; it is largely a moral term and an issue of compunction on the parts of all actors. And given the political atmosphere in Serbia and abroad, it is nowhere near being served.

Sara Haji is a third-year, Plan II and journalism student at the University of Texas at Austin.

Briefings

Previous Post

July 20, 2008

Religion and Satire: A laughable attempt at humor

Next Post

July 27, 2008 Social Networking: Dialogue for the masses

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian tradition is associated with the seven sacraments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Roman Catholicism Quakerism Seventh-day Adventism Protestantism