Religion and Satire: A laughable attempt at humor

Last updated on: July 20, 2008 at 6:00 pm by Guest Contributor

Religion and Satire: A laughable attempt at humor 2008-07-20T18:00:00-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Just kidding

I’ve always been an advocate of satire. I like to laugh as much as the next person, and at an early age I was drawn to such classical pieces as Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal.” That said, the line between satire and tasteless humor is both fine and, at times, virtually indistinguishable.

Such seems to be the case with the political cartoon on the cover of last week’s The New Yorker, showcasing Barack Obama in traditional Muslim clothing as he fist-pumps his AK-47-toting, Afro-haired wife in the Oval Office, American flag burning in the background. Oh – and there’s a photo of Osama bin Ladin on the wall.

Are you laughing yet? If not, it’s only because you didn’t get the memo. You know, the one that’s supposed to follow front-page political cartoons when their target audience misunderstands them. Such a memo would explain to the American people that the cartoon was actually satirizing the recent rumors circulating about Obama’s “terrorist fist jab” and his refusal to salute the American flag, among others. The allegations are ostensibly so ridiculous that by throwing them all into one cartoon, The New Yorker was mocking and satirizing them.

This attempt at satire sounds suspiciously like conservative talk show host Don Imus’ attempt to make light of his comments last month. While on-air, discussing the most recent arrest of football player Adam Jones, Imus asked “what color” Jones is and, upon being told Jones is African-American, responded, “There you go. Now we know.” Put on the stand once again for racism, Imus defended himself, saying that he meant only to satirize police profiling of African-Americans. Now I’m sure you’re laughing.

Some comments on the web seem to be defending The New Yorker’s right to publish what its staff considers satire. No one is arguing that point. Other comments suggest the American public not take offense as easily as “those Muslim fanatics,” whose every whim need be catered to for the sake of political correctness. While The New Yorker’s cover cartoon is more likely to actually have satirical intent than Imus’ comments, it was nonetheless inappropriate and irresponsible.

Take, for instance, the methods used. At the risk of generalizing, the dressing-up and caricaturizing of a public figure in a cartoon is a device usually intended to satirize the public figure rather than a specific perception of him. Had the cartoon been of, say, Rupert Murdoch spray-painting this image on a wall, the magazine may have more clearly delivered its message. Furthermore, the sheer need to issue a statement explaining the satire speaks to the inefficacy of the cartoon to actually mock what it claims to be mocking. Good editorial cartoons ought to stand alone, or, if necessary, have a tag line. But a press release? Never.

Understanding the satire is most significantly predicated upon knowing how ridiculous the circulating rumors are. And if readers – or even non-readers – haven’t yet acquired that base of knowledge, then the cartoon is merely feeding the prejudices of millions of voters.

Among the online reader defenses of The New Yorker are that satire is subject to varying interpretations and that the magazine’s readership is relegated to the few and the sophisticated of New York who should understand and appreciate the joke.

It’s very true that satire is in the eye of the beholder. Unfortunately, when the beholder is an entire nation to whom the concepts satirized are fresh and not universally acknowledged as ridiculous, the joke seems to be on those of us attempting to clear the air of the backlash that inevitably ensues. Like Don Imus, The New Yorker cannot satirize idiocy by recapitulating it. The very nature of satire involves taking absurdity to new heights in order to poke at something already absurd. When Swift wrote “A Modest Proposal,” the suggestion of eating the nation’s children was so shocking that there could hardly have been doubt as to its satirical nature. Unfortunately, with regard to Barack Obama and his ties to Islam, everything absurd has already been said, reducing the cartoon to a pathetic echo of already over-the-top rumors.

Yes, the cartoon was meant to be a joke for the left. But for those people who genuinely believe the concepts being satirized on the front cover, it’s only reinforcement. No doubt The New Yorker, esteemed publication that it is, recognized that the cartoon falls into a gray zone of appropriateness, as far as political commentary goes. The responsibility of the editorial staff, however, should have extended beyond the need to sell magazines and into the responsibility to foresee the effects of the “wrong” interpretation of such a cover. As to the readership argument – well, I’d like to welcome you all to the 21st century, where the readership of a small magazine expands to the population at large the minute a remotely incendiary cartoon hits the World Wide Web. As the editors most likely knew it would.

I can tell you how the cartoon hurts Muslims everywhere, but I’m sure you already know that. By linking Obama’s marginally Muslim descent to stereotypical images of terrorism, The New Yorker is not only harming the Obama campaign, but also inadvertently aiding to solidify a nation’s misinformed image of a religion. And that is in no way funny.

Sara Haji is a third-year, Plan II and journalism student at the University of Texas at Austin.

Commentary

Previous Post

July 16, 2008

Gujarat Minister Narendra Modi: Hitler’s avatar tries again

Next Post

July 24, 2008 Radovan Karadžić arrest: Not justice, but politics

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Bible say about using one's gifts or talents?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Use them for God's glory Waste them Brag about them Hide them