Muslim Stereotypes: Understanding Muslim language

Last updated on: May 29, 2006 at 2:24 pm by Svend White

Muslim Stereotypes: Understanding Muslim language 2006-05-29T14:24:00-04:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Of course, he speaks for all of us

My heart really goes out to journalists charged with the daunting task of getting to the bottom of the neverending mayhem of the Middle East and Muslim world. The region’s confusing and disturbing twists and turns are only made ever more inscrutable by the baffling way Muslims talk. Their perplexing words make it even harder for normal people to make sense of the screaming headlines we read every day reporting the latest outbreak of violence, irrationality, or hatred over there. But it needn’t be quite so confusing.

What few outsiders realize, however, is that there are a number of closely guarded secrets among Muslims that once grasped explain all sorts of bizarre political and social phenomena that otherwise appear inexplicable. Once you realize that the rules of common sense don’t apply to Muslims, most of these mysteries are solved. In the hopes of making the jobs of America’s overworked journalists and pundits a bit easier, I’m going to share a few of the most important rules for understanding Muslim language:

Rule 1: Muslims always speak truthfully and literally… Muslims always mean exactly what they say and in as literally a sense as possible. It’s a commonly known fact that all Muslims are born with (or acquire instantly upon conversion) dazzling, Ciceronian eloquence and supercomputer-like minds that allow them to effortlessly think through the political, social and theological implications of even the most off-the-cuff observation down to the smallest detail. As a result, Muslims never say things they don’t mean in the heat of the moment, use ambiguous language that has to be judged by its context, or generally misspeak in any way.

At the same time, since the concepts of metaphor, exaggerations, or dramatic license are Western innovations that have yet to reach the lands of Rumi, Al-Ghazzali, and expressions like “The Mother of all Battles”, Muslims always speak literally. Literally.

Ergo, if a Pakistani American Red Sox fan in Boston exclaims, “Damn those Yankees!”, it is possible that he dislikes the New York Yankees, but his aim in speaking is to issue a fatwah on the final fate of all that baseball team’s members. When a Muslim exclaims to a friend, “Man, I’m gonna kill you!” he is not expressing anger or frustration but rather informing his associate of the latter’s imminent death. And when a Muslim states that a movie “bombed”, he has no intention of conveying that the film did poorly at the box office or that it failed to meet his expectations as a moviegoer. He is reporting (happily㳥 Rule 4) that the film literally exploded in a fiery cataclysm in the theater, presumably maiming if not killing many innocent bystanders.

Rule 2: …except when they’re lying to trick you. There is an exception to Rule 1, namely when a Muslim states anything which is modern, enlightened, politically moderate or generally inspiring.

Muslims are deceitful by nature and come into the world hardwired with the most abhorrent and alien of values. (Just like those cunning Jews!) Consequently, the most reliable method of determining a Muslim’s beliefs when he is saying something you agree with is to disregard his words and instead consider what views a civilized, modern person would hold on the topic in question. Then choose the opposite approach, no matter how chilling, seemingly implausible, or strenuously denied the reading is and you have the answer.

Wondering whether Palestinians consider their children disposable cannon fodder for jihad against the Jews? Don’t waste your time analyzing their circumstances. Do normal people love and protect their children from harm? There you have it. Palestinians clearly don’t love or care about protecting their children.

Also, it goes without saying that there is no such thing as a Muslim apology or change of heart.

Rule 3: Muslim words apply to all times and places. A fact that has long puzzled linguists is how the phenomenon discussed in Rule 1 applies to all circumstances and places. Muslim utterances retain their meaning, intent and political significance in translation – regardless of the translation’s quality and even when a translation of translation is involved – and regardless of the historical and cultural circumstances to which they are transplanted.

Thus, the aforementioned malediction against the New York Yankees can not only be translated word for word into any human language without introducing any misunderstandings, but its theological commentary can be applied not only to fellow believers in an afterlife such as Christians and Jews, but also to atheists in New York, Wiccans in California, Shintoists in Japan, and Yuruba animists in southwestern Nigeria. Don’t fret about authorial intent or context–he’s a Muslim, so he thought it all through for you before saying a word.

Rule 4: Deep down, Muslims are always thinking about (and yearning for) violence. Muslims are by nature warlike and inclined to violence, so physically harming other people is never absent from their minds, regardless of the topic under discussion. In cases where they endeavor to conceal this fact, you need to just strap ’em down and break out the lie detector.

Thus, if a Muslim American student activist talks about his personal interpretation of jihad (struggle in God’s way) as striving to integrate Islam’s values of justice and service to ones fellow citizens into his daily life as a patriotic American, you can be sure that he is in reality trying to slip in a plug for terrorists who behead and kill plane loads of those same citizens. Similarly, if some graduating Muslims students decide to wear green stoles at graduation that read in Arabic Rabbi ziddini ilm (“Oh Lord, grant me knowledge”, a prayer from the Quran) on one side and the Islamic profession of faith or Shahada on the other, these provocateurs are obviously trying to turn their graduation ceremony into a tribute to the Hamas suicide bombers (who are known for wearing black armbands emblazoned with the Shahada). Don’t let the fact that Muslims use those prayers in the most mundane of situations – even before going to bed – throw you off the scent.

Rule 5: It’s always “jihad”. Related to Rule 4 is the fact that any event involving Muslims is always jihad. Not the concept of a peaceful personal struggle to do the right thing that most Muslims, sly foxes that they are, claim to intend when using the word. Nor is it the noble campaigns for good causes that normal, Christian people think of when they talk about “crusades”. Anything a Muslims does is always violent holy war directed against everyone around them.

Whether they’re pinning prayers to their graduation gowns or just standing by the road licking an ice cream cone, it’s jihad and you’re under siege like the Viennese facing the Ottoman hordes in 1529. Don’t let the social economic and political realities of near complete Muslim powerlessness in the modern, Western/Christian-dominated world distract you from the fact that you are an oppressed Dhimmi living under the yoke of Muslim tyranny.

So make sure you pepper your report with the word “jihad” and other buzzwords that remind readers of the mortal peril we all live in thanks to the existence of Islam. Don’t forget to mention medieval Islamic concepts like jizya, slavery, and, everyone’s favorite, houris. The fact that these concepts are about as relevant to most modern political problems as Danegeld is besides the point. Wherever context permits make hysterical allusions to Nazism since that hateful ideology developed in Germany, the heartland of Islamic civilization. (The world still shudders at the memory of their chilling symbol, the dreaded Iron Crescent & Star!)

Finally, always err on the side of innuendo, paranoia and stereotype. Remember that if you can’t think of a good reason for inserting prejudicial language now, someone else will eventually dream up a retroactive justification. And then you’ll be a prophet.

Svend White is an IT consultant and Muslim activist in Washington, DC. His blog is at http://akramsrazor.typepad.com

Commentary

Svend White

Previous Post

May 24, 2006

Keith Ellison campaign: Will Minnesota send the first Muslim to Congress?

Next Post

May 30, 2006 Indonesia Earthquake: Indonesia’s city of soul mourns

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was King Zedekiah, and what did he do to anger God and ensure Jerusalem's fall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He burned the scroll He rebelled against Babylon He built an idol He killed Jeremiah