British Muslims: Fear and loathing in the MCB

Last updated on: January 12, 2006 at 2:00 am by zahedamanullah

British Muslims: Fear and loathing in the MCB 2006-01-12T02:00:00-04:00 zahedamanullah

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

You mean he’s… teh GAY?

Back in July 2005, when four young British Muslims killed scores on the London Underground, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), Britain’s largest umbrella organization for Muslims, was quick to condemn the crime and join the fight against extremism, expressing its “anguish, shock and horror.” The group offered its services to the Blair government and visited mosques in Yorkshire to implore others to join in the struggle. It was a constructive moment of humility and honesty, likely helpng to avert further backlash as British Muslims and non-Muslims looked for answers within their own communities and not just outside them.

Yet if one looks back on 2005, the MCB is arguably best known not for the results of these efforts, but for it’s reaction to a critical (post 7/7) BBC Panorama documentary that challenged their approach and philosophy, with criticism included from some fellow Muslims. The MCB’s response was apoplectic.

The documentary was in many ways a no-win situation for the MCB and was clearly meant to exploit many of the MCB’s questionable actions and comments in the past. But in a different context, many of the criticisms would still be worth making, if only to point out the appearance of impropriety groups like this should avoid. Critical – even hostile – journalism should be expected of any leader or organisation, Muslim or otherwise.

However, carefully crafted responses can often overcome the unfair questions. How we respond to critics is as important as what we actually say, and the MCB’s defensiveness only fueled the fire. It is difficult to find any criticism – especially from Muslims – taken constructively by the MCB, and this is not lost on the British public. Ultimately, the controversy overshadowed the MCB’s post-7/7 efforts, which also failed to stop a string of ill-conceived anti-terror legislation from being developed.

How did this all happen? Part of the answer may lie in how the MCB chooses its battles. The MCB is not so much a legislative or theological group as an advocacy group that seeks its mandate through smaller Muslim organisations whose affiliation they solicit. It has an advisory board that meets at least twice a year made up representatives from its affiliates, who choose to have the MCB represent them to the public. The group’s 400 affiliates make up a wide range of mainstream Muslim groups and mosques throughout Britain (even though many have questioned the inclusion of some groups and the exclusion of others).

Ideally, the organisation would have the concerns of Muslim communities filtered up to the leadership, which would then represent them to the greater British public in a way that helps them understand our point of view, improving perceptions of Muslims and enhancing the strategic use of our influence. These would be the battles worth fighting.

So what battles have the MCB chosen for 2006?

Well, this year the group has decided to again boycott Holocaust Memorial Day, instead calling for it to be replaced “Genocide Memorial Day” that would include the killings in Chechnya, Kashmir, and Palestine. “Such a day would help dispel the – frankly racist – notion that some people are to be regarded as being more equal than others,” said Sir Iqbal Sacranie, the group’s secretary general.

Creating a day to commemorate the victims of genocide is a laudable idea, and the MCB would have the moral high ground if it chose to organise one itself, include the Holocaust, and invite Jewish groups to participate (while returning the gesture to them on their day). At that point, those same groups may refuse to attend, claiming a politicising of the issue.

Instead, the MCB would rather be in that embarassing position themselves with the whole episode looking like a strange sort of victim envy, questioned by even our closest non-Muslim supporters. Muslim groups have never made it a priority to include commemorations of non-Muslims with our grievances. Why would we insist others do the same?

The next battle, coming on the heels of the legalisation of domestic partnerships in Britain, was a tirade against homosexuality, labelling it “harmful” to society and “not acceptable”. “We tolerate each other,” said Sacranie. “We may not be happy with the views being expressed by others. But the difficulty comes in that at the end of the day we are human beings.”

By this standard, much of the BNP’s hateful rhetoric towards Muslims – who they deemed “harmful” to British society in another BBC documentary – should be “tolerated” by British Muslims and not marginalised. No one would be surprised to hear that many Muslims, like those of other faiths, consider homosexuality incompatible with their religion. The key is the context in which the comments are made (i.e., appearing to impose those views on the public) and the benefit, if any, gained by British Muslims by making them. Faith groups have long since made their case about homosexuality. The wiser ones have realised that British society will remain pluralistic.

Before his comments on homosexuality, Sacranie agreed to appear at a forthcoming (and sold out) conference in London. He’ll happen to be joined in a panel discussion by two outspoken gay rights activists, who will no doubt remind him that he is now being investigated for hate crimes by the police.

The press will be ready and the MCB, in ways known only to itself, will be planning its next battles.

Zahed Amanullah is associate editor of altmuslim.com. He is based in London, England.

Commentary

Zahed Amanullah

Previous Post

January 9, 2006

Religion and Society: Bill O’Reilly, Pat Robertson and religion in America

Next Post

January 16, 2006 Death of Ariel Sharon: The Middle East in a post-Sharon world

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was it that allowed the Israelites to return to Jerusalem from exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Artaxerxes Cyrus the Great Darius Nebuchadnezzar