Islamic Ideology: How progressive is the Progressive Muslim movement?

Last updated on: August 23, 2005 at 1:00 am by Guest Contributor

Islamic Ideology: How progressive is the Progressive Muslim movement? 2005-08-23T01:00:00-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Opinions everywhere

Islam is a religion often entwined in intellectual debate. Changing social pressures both external and internal demand responses. Scholars and leaders must rise to the occasion and guide the believers to the best answer. Recent events publicized in the media seem to be accelerating this natural process.

The term “Progressive Muslim” has been used by both supporters and detractors to forward individual agendas. The progressive Muslim movement is an umbrella term for believers trying to navigate an ever-changing socio-political landscape in North America along with the pressures of globalization. The progressive movement strips away cultural and emotional aspects of 21st century Islam to redefine it in a more sociologically relevant image. To some it is a humanization of the apparent unpleasant side of Islamic dogma and rhetoric including gender separation, anti-homosexual doctrines, intolerance of other faiths and the role of warfare and violence in Islamic history.

Detractors of the movement see a subversion of Allah’s message as well as the example of His last Prophet (PBUH) to achieve political correctness and to spin a more palatable religion; easier to sell as sound bites and polite dinner party conversation. They see 1400 years of tradition and knowledge ignored and denied.

Neither side can win this debate without the Muslim Ummah paying a heavy price. If the progressive movement wins its attempt to re-write the religion for Muslims in the West a split will invariably develop and we the believers will be forced to choose which type of Muslim we are, which masjid to attend and to whom we can say salaam. If the traditionalists are victorious many good Muslims will be disenfranchised and lost permanently.

I believe both sides have the same goal; to serve Allah while living as good citizens of the world. Any change is painful and potentially confrontational. What needs to be determined is where change is warranted and if that change is legitimate. The Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) should be our guide in such matters. Most scholars agree that for the Prophet (PBUH), given reasonable options, he preferred the easier, less burdensome path.

Does the progressive Muslim movement represent this? Are the essential message and spirit of Islam preserved despite the concerns of traditional Muslims? At this point it is difficult to say exactly what falls under the rubric of progressive. The movement has yet to clearly define what if anything is too progressive. Once this boundary is identified, hopefully the debate can being in earnest. Without presenting believers with a clear understanding of what they represent, the movement is at risk of making itself unrecognizable to mainstream believers both here and especially abroad.

With the ground rules established, the next question is where this dialogue should take place. The progressive movement ideologies are most visible on the internet, in various academic institutions in North America and the popular press. Mainstream Islam in the US still takes its cues from the local masjid level and, arguably, to a large degree from overseas influences. A recent study by the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and the work of others including Jeffery Lang suggest that organized Islam (i.e. masjids) in this country are failing to serve many American-born and second generation Muslims. Many good Muslims are unable to connect with the masjid hierarchy and culture. It is in the interest of these masjids to become more relevant to the Ummah in the US and to engage them on both an intellectual and spiritual level.

The Progressive movement needs to take the discourse to the grassroots level. The movement must extend its sphere of influences beyond its present comfortable boundaries and allow the believers to hear and understand why change is necessary. It is in the interest of both sides to engage the believers in North America. Only good can come of a clear, deliberate and impassioned discourse. After all, the search for knowledge and truth is a basic tenet of Islam. But if this debate results in the disharmony within or schism of the Ummah one must pause to reflect on the merits of the conflict. If the argument cannot be won at this level, possibly the progressive movement is wrong in its attempts to modify the practices and ideologies of Muslims. Maybe what is being proposed is not even Islamic.

The “meetups” organized by the Progressive Muslim Union are a good start, though a pitfall to avoid is losing focus of the true issues at hand. The discourse can drift off course due to participants desires to upstage or distract for political gain. The abortion debate is a classic example – since there is no anti-choice or anti-life movement the two side never have to clash head on. Both sides can retain the moral superiority of being pro-choice and pro-life without the risk of saying something which may lose them favor in the arena of public opinion. There can never be a resolution to the abortion issue until both sides decide to proceed in earnest with the realization that one group will lose. A female Imam for jummah salat in New York City does not answer the question of gender segregation that exists in every masjid (worldwide). It merely serves as a distraction. The issues we Muslims face here today are too important to allow them to deteriorate into such a quandary.

The role of religion should be to guide us through the murky path towards goodness and salvation. If progressive Islam is the natural evolution of our religion in the United States then, Inshallah, nothing can stop it. However, if it turns out to be a reactionary phase that distracts true believers, much infighting and bitterness will have been for nothing. For all of us the imperative should be that Islam survive and thrive in the US for the next generation and beyond. Our goal should be a religion that first and foremost provides for the believers at least as well, and possibly better than traditional Islam has done for those before us. Our Islam must exist in a form recognizable by Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and give believers the least difficult path to follow. Political correctness and polite dinner conversation come in a very distant second.

Aamir Siddiqui, who was born in Pakistan and raised in Chicago, is a physician living in Detroit, Michigan with his wife and 2 inquisitive children. He studied English at Johns Hopkins University and medicine at Northwestern University.

Commentary

Previous Post

August 21, 2005

The Muslim world: Challenging Islamic nationalism

Next Post

August 23, 2005 Podcasts: altmuslim review 006

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2012 Elections 30 Dayd 30 Writers (2017) 30 Days 30 Writers 30 Days 30 Writers (2015) 30 Days 30 Writers (2016) 30 Days 30 Writers (2018) 30 Days 30 Writers 2017 Ali Asadullah Ali Eteraz Alper Bilgili Arthur Richards Asides Asma Uddin Black History Month Briefings Charles Turner Commentary Cyrus McGoldrick Eman H Aly Fatimah Popal Hajj Hajj and Dhul Hijjah Hesham Hassaballa Hisham Hellyer Ibrahim Abusharif Inas Younis Irfan Yusuf Jalal Baig Junaid Afeef Laila Alawa Laila Alwala Mas'ood Cajee Muqtedar Khan Nakia Jackson Newsmakers Parvez Ahmed Podcasts Rabia Chaudry Rafia Zakaria Ramadan Reviews Safiyyah Ally Saud Inam Shahed Amanullah Svend White The Opinionated Oncologist Visions Wajahat Ali Zahed Amanullah Zahir Janmohamed Zainab Khan

Select a Month November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many verses are in the shortest chapter in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 2 5 10