Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
Why Is There So Much Disdain for Universalism?

Why Is There So Much Disdain for Universalism?

Last updated on: June 21, 2021 at 7:50 am by Matthew Distefano

Why Is There So Much Disdain for Universalism? 2021-06-21T07:50:16-06:00 Matthew Distefano

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Universalism pisses a lot of Christians off. Not all of them, but a lot of them. I would know; I’ve been a Universalist in some capacity for nearly a decade and I’ve pretty much seen it all. Typically, these “Jesus-loving Christians” stick to the traditional insults like wolf in sheep’s clothing, heretic, apostate, and the like. But sometimes these shining lights of love take it a step further by wishing we could go back to a time when it was okay to lynch folks like me. One so-called “follower of Jesus” even said they had the skills to find out where I lived so they could come pay me a visit (I’m of Sicilian heritage so I know what this “Don” meant by that).

But what about a theology of all-inclusive love pisses Christians off so much? Shouldn’t they be happy that God’s love and mercy are wider, higher, deeper, and broader than anyone could ever imagine? I mean, I’m assuming the angry Christians who slide in my DMs to let me know how vile I am also sin once in a while, if not on the daily. So, shouldn’t they be at least a little bit relieved to hear how God’s not going to destroy them like the pathetic vermin the Bible says they are?

One would think.

But such is not the case. If anything, it does the opposite. Why is this?

There are probably a couple of reasons.

I. “What’s the point in following Jesus?”

Their logic goes like this: If everyone is or will be saved, what’s the point in following Jesus? Yes, I’ve seen this question in various forms more times than I’d like to think. That’s why it was the first question I tackled in my ridiculously popular book Heretic!. These folks think that if all are going to be saved anyway, what’s the point in giving their lives to Christ? To my mind, this says more about them and their desires than anything else. They see following Jesus as a burden, one that needs an eternal ultimatum to make it “worth it.” But doesn’t following Jesus stand on its own? Shouldn’t we want to follow the one we claim as “Lord” without needing a cookie as a reward?

Furthermore, if Christian Universalism is true, then Jesus is still the savior and Lord. In other words, it’s better to know the truth now than later. Also, just because there are not everlasting consequences doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences at all. And look, I don’t think those who don’t happen to have Jesus in their lives are going to be punished, but the point being: Those who do believe this can still believe it and not demonize those who think the consequences have some sort of lasting effect. In other words, you can still believe in some sort of afterlife punishment for getting things wrong and reject eternal torment. It doesn’t have to be such a starkly binary, all or nothing, proposition.

II. Their life’s work has been undermined

Many Christians take the “Billy Graham” approach to soul saving. Not that they put too much effort into evangelizing, but their whole approach is a bit “turn or burn.” My grandfather in law (God rest his soul) literally said as much when I came out as a Universalist. He was a pastor for decades and when he found out I believed in universal reconciliation, he said I was undermining his entire life’s work. To some degree, I can’t disagree with him all that much.

There is a difference, though. Like I said above, just because there aren’t everlasting consequences to our actions doesn’t mean our decisions don’t matter. Of course they matter. Life just isn’t a high-stakes game of the greatest kind, nor should it be. We have limited capacities so holding us to an eternal standard is a bit overkill, is it not? Plus, if God created all of us, and then either sends us to hell or allows us to go to hell for all eternity, isn’t he the one who is ultimately responsible? You wouldn’t, in all of your infinite wisdom, create an airplane and then when it fails to fly, go all “Office Space” on it for time-everlasting, would you? (If you don’t understand the reference, click this link). Then why argue for a God who does this to beings created in his image and likeness? It makes no sense.

III. If there is an “us,” there has to be a “them”

Typical human thinking goes like this: If there is an “us,” there has to be a “them.” In some instances, this is all fine and good. For example, a part of why I love sports so much are the rivalries. I’m a die-hard Red Sox fan, so naturally I hate the Yankees. As much as it pains me to say this, I’m also a huge Tottenham Hotspur supporter, so I hate Arsenal. I’ve been a bitter, Stanley-cup-less San Jose Sharks fan for over 30 years, so it’s obvious as to why I hate the Ducks and Kings. In all these instances, it makes for more engaging club/team support. And I get that.

But when it comes to matters of faith (or politics), we need to rid ourselves of this binary thinking. Throughout history, too often this has led to great human suffering. We kill and maim and pillage because, as the prophet and poet Bob Dylan once said, God’s on our side. That’s how it always goes. God is with US, which means God is obviously against THEM. So, if we are “going to heaven” when we die, there must be a group who “goes to hell.” If there are “the elect,” there certainly must be “the non-elect.” If there are the righteous (us), there certainly must be the wicked (them). It almost always plays out like this, but shouldn’t.

And look, at the end of the day, I’m not asking for people to drop their doctrines and embrace Universalism the minute they hear about it. Typically, beliefs don’t work like that. Wrestle through things. Ask hard questions. Sincerely seek. But don’t be so damn quick to react with such vitriol and disdain the minute you hear a doctrine that upends your so-called pious sensibilities. You end up looking like the judgmental jerk the Bible so often warns others about. To quote the apostle Paul, “Therefore you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things.”

And so, if you hate Universalism so much, maybe you’ll find yourself among the lost, wishing the so-called heretics and apostates you demonized and hated so much were actually correct. Because the last time I checked, some of y’all Christians are among the least loving and most judgmental folks I’ve ever come across, and I’ve met a lot of people. At least consider this.

If you wanna get to know me better, please follow me on social media. I’m pretty active on all platforms:

Also, if you’ve been digging my work on here, and want to see me be able to continue writing as close to full-time as humanly possible, please take a look at my Patreon page at www.patreon.com/mjdistefano. Even $1 a month helps bigly!!!

christian universalism

eternal conscious torment

evangelism

hell

Universalism

About Matthew Distefano

Matthew is a best-selling author, blogger, podcaster, long-time social worker, and hip-hop artist. He is an outspoken advocate for nonviolence, happily married, with one daughter. Outside of writing, his interests include gardening, hiking, and European football. He lives in Northern California You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

June 17, 2021

Some Thoughts On My Recent Discussion/Debate

Next Post

June 22, 2021 Take It Easy: Some Ground Rules for this Blog

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Book Review Early Church Eschatology eternal torment Hell Hermeneutics LGBTQ+ Mimetic Theory Mysticism News Old Testament Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Religion Sacrifice Satire Soteriology Theology Uncategorized Violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 June 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Beersheba" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

House of the King Blessed Field Well of the Oath Valley of Water

Books by This Author Books by All Set Free

See All Titles »