Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
The Absurdity of Hell

The Absurdity of Hell

Last updated on: May 24, 2021 at 10:19 am by Matthew Distefano

The Absurdity of Hell 2021-05-24T10:19:23-06:00 Matthew Distefano

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The moment when you take your first step through the gates of hell, the only thing you will hear is all of creation standing to its feet and applauding and praising God because God has rid the earth of you. That’s how not good you are. ~ Paul Washer

For most Christians, even to this day, hell is eternal. It is a place of either literal or figurative flames. Most “sophisticated” thinkers argue for figurative flames due to the grotesque nature of burning humans – magically kept alive for the sole purpose of perpetual suffering – but an eternity of existential suffering is hardly sophistication. In fact, figurative torment is not an improvement at all. It’s simply a psychological sidestep used to defend an indefensible doctrine (as well as an indefensible God).

Now, let me be clear: Not all doctrines of eternal hell are created equal (though all are equally absurd). In the quote above, Washer seems to get off on the idea that some (in all honesty, most) will be forever lost to the flames below, though he is hardly the first Christian “thinker” to become titillated at the idea. Early Church Father Tertullian swims in the same stream of calloused theological bullshit:

At that greatest of all spectacles, that last and eternal judgment how shall I admire, how laugh, how rejoice, how exult, when I behold so many proud monarchs groaning in the lowest abyss of darkness; so many magistrates liquifying in fiercer flames than they ever kindled against the Christians; so many sage philosophers blushing in red-hot fires with their deluded pupils; so many tragedians more tuneful in the expression of their own sufferings; so many dancers tripping more nimbly from anguish than ever before from applause. ~ De Spectaculis, Ch. XXX.

Today, though, most infernalists argue for a “nicer” version of hell, one that they assume gets God off the moral hook. For, you see, it’s not God that desires hell, it’s “free” human beings. Like C.S. Lewis before them, they argue that “the gates of hell are locked from the inside.” Meaning, if God could save them, God would. He just doesn’t have the key.

The problem, of course, is that anyone who would choose, as philosopher Thomas Talbott once put it, “objective horror over objective bliss,” is hardly free. In fact, they are no more free than the person who spontaneously thrusts their face into a raging bonfire for the sole sake of spiting God. As theologian David Bentley Hart so eloquently puts it:

An injured, damaged, and deluded person might behave in such a manner, but never a free person. Freely, sanely, deliberatively to elect misery forever rather than bliss would be a form of madness. To call that madness freedom, in order to soothe our consciences and to continue to reconcile ourselves to a picture of reality that is morally absurd, is to talk gibberish.

Now, one can erroneously argue, as Arminian philosopher Jerry Walls has done, that while this “face-thrusting” isn’t in and of itself a free choice, poorly chosen free decisions prior to this event led to their unfortunate self-mutilation. But such an argument just kicks the can down the road. I’m almost forced to ask: If the choice “back then” was so free – that is, free from any illusion or delusion that prevents the person from making a fully-informed choice – why did it lead to such an enslaved and deranged ultimate decision? In other words, no truly free person makes choices that eventually leads them to make the ultimate absurd choice. It’s always presupposed by some sort of enslavement or ignorance that not even a near-infinite regress satisfies.

Of course, none of this even begins to consider the interconnectedness of humanity, whether in regards to one’s volition or their happiness. That is to say, not only is it fantastically absurd to think of human freedom as totally devoid of all outside influences – friends, family members, those whom we look up to and are influenced by – but it is overwhelmingly arrogant to think we could ever find complete bliss in a heaven devoid of those we claim to love in the here and now. If, as the writer of Revelation suggests, God will one day wipe all tears from our eyes, then it is either by reconciling all whom we love, or by making us, at least in part, apathetic to the tragic fact that they are forever lost. If it is the former, fantastic! If the latter, then it is because we have become shells of our former selves, “Walking Dead” zombies stripped of everything that makes us a human being.

In this scenario, then, no matter how you slice it, heaven becomes a hell of sorts. As the sign at the gates of Dante’s Inferno reads, “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.” Hope for reconciliation, whether loved ones are damned by God or damn themselves, is lost forever. If hell is eternal, so too is hopelessness for all those who continue to exist. The location – heaven or hell – matters not.

This is one reason why eternal hell is absurd. The other, no doubt, is that for hell to be eternal, God has to be present in it. For if God is not, then how can hell exist at all? It seems like a metaphysical absurdity. Further, how could God be “omnipresent” if God is not present in the place where most of God’s creation ends up? Again, this seems absurd, does it not?

The Eastern Orthodox – those among them who believe in the eternality of hell, anyway – have a solution to this: God is present with those in hell. Hell, for them, isn’t the absence of God; it’s experiencing the love of God as nothing but white-hot torment. Again, though, this seems like a misunderstanding or mischaracterization of human volition. It gets back to the absurd notion that truly free individuals would ever choose objective horror (hell) over objective bliss (heaven). What these folks need more than anything is liberation. They need to be freed from whatever it is that causes love to be subjectively experienced as torment. They need, as St. Paul would put it, the “wood, hay, and stubble” burned from them so that the only thing left is the precious gem they truly are.

To this end, it’s high time Christians take seriously the charges against this damnable doctrine. It’s an affront to the character of God, but more than that, an absurdity so damaging that I’m surprised more people aren’t walking away from Christianity altogether. As polls suggest, they are leaving. And for good reason. But for many, fear is keeping them trapped. As my best friend and coauthor of many of my books says, “fear is a trap and the fear of hell is the ultimate trap.” So, let’s break free from this absurd trap and condemn eternal hell to an eternity in its own flames.

If you wanna get to know me better, please follow me on social media. I’m pretty active on all platforms:

Also, if you’ve been digging my work on here, and want to see me be able to continue writing as close to full-time as humanly possible, please take a look at my Patreon page at www.patreon.com/mjdistefano. Even $1 a month helps bigly!!!

universal reconciliation

Universalism

About Matthew J. Distefano

Matthew is a best-selling author, blogger, podcaster, long-time social worker, and hip-hop artist. He is an outspoken advocate for nonviolence, happily married, with one daughter. Outside of writing, his interests include gardening, hiking, and European football. He lives in Northern California You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

May 20, 2021

"10 Rules of Sex for Wives": A Response

Next Post

May 26, 2021 Can We At Least Be Consistent? Slavery, the LGBTQ Community, and the Bible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Book Review Early Church Eschatology eternal torment Hell Hermeneutics LGBTQ+ Mimetic Theory Mysticism News Old Testament Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Religion Sacrifice Satire Soteriology Theology Uncategorized Violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 June 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who became jealous and tried to kill David several times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abiathar Abner Saul Samuel

Books by This Author Books by All Set Free

See All Titles »