Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

allsetfree

Can We At Least Be Consistent? Slavery, the LGBTQ Community, and the Bible

Last updated on: May 26, 2021 at 7:56 am   by Matthew Distefano

Can We At Least Be Consistent? Slavery, the LGBTQ Community, and the Bible 2021-05-26T07:56:56-06:00 Matthew Distefano

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few weeks back, I was watching an online debate between my friend Keith Giles and some dude I’ve never heard of (sorry, bro, I can’t remember your name). The topic was “how to read the Bible.” Keith took a more Christocentric approach (meaning: if it doesn’t look like Jesus, it’s probably wrong) while the other guy was closer to an inerrantist (meaning: all of it is correct to some degree).

Overall, it was a pretty interesting debate, but when the topic of slavery was brought up, the dial got ratcheted up to eleven.

Keith made the point that the Bible never condemns slavery outright. Sure, one can use verses about mutual submission (Ephesians 5) or about Jesus coming not to be served but to serve (Matthew 20), but there is not one verse that says “thou shalt not have slaves.” His point being that we need a hermeneutical lens in order to approach Scripture. Okay. Cool. Agreed.

Keith’s debate partner took it a different route. His argument was basically this: The type of slavery found in the Bible is not the same (or as bad) as the transatlantic slave trade that forced Black Africans to the shores of the US, therefore we shouldn’t view the Scriptures as condoning something horrific. Basically, to do so would be anachronistic.

Okay. Sure. Fine. Whatever. I suppose that’s technically true, but I think we’re missing the point there.

However, putting aside all the things I could say about that, his statements immediately made me think of the LGBTQ community and how, with this debater’s logic, he should completely affirm us.

How so?

Well, if he is being consistent, then he would have to admit that the Bible doesn’t have anything to say about what we now call “sexual  identity.” In fact, the Bible CAN’T have anything to say about sexual identity because that’s not how they thought about things back then. There wasn’t what we now call “homosexual” or even “heterosexual” for that matter. There were homoerotic relationships, of course, but even these didn’t make one “gay” or “bi” or anything like that. To say otherwise is to engage in gross anachronism.

Typically, when sex acts are discussed, like in Romans and 1 Corinthians, there is a certain context in the mind of the writer (in these cases, Paul). What is the context? Not loving partnerships. Not marriage. Not committed relationships. No, none of these! Instead, it’s temple prostitution. It’s coercion. It’s basically older, well-to-do Roman men having sex with younger, (most likely) teenage boys. This is what is condemned. And rightfully so!

The point being: If you want to say that the Bible doesn’t condemn slavery because it’s “not as bad as the slavery America engaged in,” then at least be consistent and say that the Bible doesn’t condemn the LGBTQ community because the LGBTQ relationships we see today (generally) have nothing to do with what was going on in the first century. At least be consistent. If you want to apply the anachronistic label to the slavery issue, then you have to apply it to the sexuality one.

But this is the problem with many modern Christians. They, on the one hand, condemn those of us who “cherry pick” the Scriptures while on the other, do the same exact thing themselves. They know slavery is wrong, so they make for themselves an out. They also (think they) know that being gay is wrong, so they flip the script and make the Bible say something it isn’t saying. In other words, they eisegete the text just as bad as they claim progressives do.

So, my question is this: If the Bible doesn’t condemn slavery because it wasn’t as bad as America’s slave trade, why do you condemn the LGBTQ community if today’s gender and sexual minorities have nothing to do with what was going on in the first century? To my mind, if it’s anachronistic with regards to slavery, then it’s just as anachronistic when it comes to sexuality.

Something to think about.


If you wanna get to know me better, please follow me on social media. I’m pretty active on all platforms:

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

YouTube

Also, if you’ve been digging my work on here, and want to see me be able to continue writing as close to full-time as humanly possible, please take a look at my Patreon page at www.patreon.com/mjdistefano. Even $1 a month helps bigly!!!

Hermeneutics

LGBTQ+

Politics

Theology

bible

exegesis

interpretation

lgbtq

race

slavery

theology

About Matthew Distefano

Matthew is a best-selling author, blogger, podcaster, long-time social worker, and hip-hop artist. He is an outspoken advocate for nonviolence, happily married, with one daughter. Outside of writing, his interests include gardening, hiking, and European football. He lives in Northern California You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post



May 24, 2021

The Absurdity of Hell

Next Post



June 4, 2021 What The Bible Says Doesn't Matter


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Book Review Early Church Eschatology eternal torment Hell Hermeneutics LGBTQ+ Mimetic Theory Mysticism News Old Testament Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Religion Sacrifice Satire Soteriology Theology Uncategorized Violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 June 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Hebrews say God will never do?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leave you or forsake you Fail to keep his promise Forget your work Deny his own

Books by This Author Books by All Set Free

See All Titles »

Related posts from All Set Free

Family

The Pharmakon of Autism

All Set Free

Family

Addressing the Recent Heretic Happy Hour Podcast Episode

All Set Free

Family

Yes, Max Miller, She Would Have Made You...

All Set Free

Family

The Anthony Bourdain Approach

All Set Free

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube