Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
My Embrace of the Feminine

My Embrace of the Feminine

Last updated on: December 17, 2020 at 11:12 am by Matthew Distefano

My Embrace of the Feminine 2020-12-17T11:12:35-06:00 Matthew Distefano

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I am not what most would define as a “typical, masculine man.” Sure, I have some traditionally masculine traits—strength, courage, virility, and so on—but, to one degree or another, all of us, men, women, and those don’t fit neatly into these binary categories, possess these same traits. As Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung taught, within each man exists a feminine principle (the “anima”) and within each woman exists a masculine one (the “animus”). In other words, men are not simply “masculine,” or whatever their current culture defines as masculine, and women are not simply “feminine,” or whatever their current culture defines as feminine.

However, given that we are all too prone to think dualistically about things—i.e., black/white, up/down, left/right, tall/short, skinny/fat, etc.—we tend toward placing binary labels onto ourselves: humans are either “man” or “woman,” men are “masculine” while women are “feminine,” sexuality is expressed as either “gay” or “straight,” and so on and so forth. To that end, when a man like myself comes along, one who is in no way the embodiment of cultural or religious masculinity, they are often unfairly judged as soft, or weak, or effeminate, and then bullied accordingly.

Some of the bullying, of course, is more overt than others. For instance, on three distinct occasions over the course of my adult life, I’ve had groups of passersby derogatorily yell out “faggot,” laugh to themselves, and then speed off down the road. Then there was this comment I recently received on an article I wrote:

“So, the skinny, effeminate nerd doesn’t like Christians?

Then run far away, nerd. We will miss you like a kidney stone.

If you’re a Christian, Satan is a Christian.

The only thing you ever worship is your own wide, dirty, diseased аsshоle.” ~ Jacob from Portland

Why these folks said this I can only speculate—if I had to take a stab at it, I’d say they were making up for something—but I believe it shows us how our culture treats those who don’t quite fit the stereotypical social norms of what it means to be “a real man”—after all, real men aren’t thin and they don’t wear black skinny jeans and tight-fitting tees.

Social stigmatization and ostracization isn’t always this overt and obvious, however. For example, I can recall receiving an email some years back from who I thought was a friend where he ridiculed and berated me about all the ways in which I took advantage of my wife. He didn’t base this scorning off any conversation he had with her, or after spending any amount of time with us in our home or outside of it, but entirely due to the fact that she made more money than I did and that I spent more time at home performing what are commonly referred to as “women’s duties.” This probably goes without saying, but for this gentleman, and for most of our culture (although things are slowly getting better), complementarianism is the way things are supposed to work: a man is supposed to be the breadwinner, the one who spends all his time grinding away at work; while the woman is supposed to be raising the kids, cleaning the house, and doing the laundry. And the fact that my family life didn’t fit within this cultural, and might I say, toxic religious framework, was all this person needed in order to essentially revoke my man-card.

Now, there is of course nothing wrong with men who do fit into the cultural and religious standards of what it means to be masculine. If a man loves NASCAR, shooting deer, and bringing home the bacon, for example, then by all means, that’s what he should do. There is no problem there. The problem, then, is with this being the standard of manliness. Not all men are alike, and there is no standard for what a man should be—or, at least there shouldn’t be. Standards lead to expectations, and having too many expectations will prevent us from being astonished in life. They will, without a doubt, thwart our ability to lead spontaneous and authentic lives. And further yet, placing people into gender-specific roles can be out and out harmful, primarily for women but for some men as well.

For the good part of thirty years, this was my experience. I didn’t like being bullied for how I looked or what clothes I wore; I didn’t like being virtually emasculated for having a smaller income than my wife; I didn’t like being forced to fit into a complementarian system (and neither did my feminist wife!). So, when possible, I protected myself by essentially lying about who I was, emotionally fusing with what I had always been told being a “real man” was all about. I convinced myself and others that I was purely an intellectual, void of experiencing any emotions whatsoever; after all, women are the ones who are supposed to be emotional, while men are purely rational creatures (feel free to chuckle at my sarcasm). And as such, I was living as only half a person; I was denying my “anima,” as Jung would call it.

Sadly, this is the harm that is done when we create these standards of expectation. We cause ourselves and others to live these lives in which everything becomes a façade for fear of being pushed to the fringes of society. Which is why, as men, we need to recognize our feminine side. We need to recognize our “anima.” Even the bad-ass, type-A men out there—the Hemingways, Stalones, and Kennedys—have a feminine side. And not only is that okay, but it should be celebrated.

I’m thoroughly convinced, then, that to be truly masculine is to not deny your femininity. Just as doubt is not the opposite of faith, femininity is not the opposite of manliness. Both masculine and feminine are what it means to be a man. (Just as both feminine and masculine are what it means to be a woman.) And sure, everything is on a spectrum. Some men will naturally fall on the more masculine side of things—if we want to put it that way—while others will display much more feminine qualities. But only with both qualities recognized will we truly live authentic lives.

If you want to follow me on social media, here are some links. I am pretty active on all platforms, and would love to connect.

Previous Post

December 15, 2020

Sins We Need To Talk About

Next Post

December 21, 2020 New PODCAST: Christianity as The Satan

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Book Review Early Church Eschatology eternal torment Hell Hermeneutics LGBTQ+ Mimetic Theory Mysticism News Old Testament Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Religion Sacrifice Satire Soteriology Theology Uncategorized Violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 June 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book in the New Testament is the shortest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jude 2 John 3 John Philemon

Books by This Author Books by All Set Free

See All Titles »