Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

allsetfree

The Myth of a Violent Jesus: Part 3, The Return

Last updated on: March 17, 2018 at 2:56 pm   by Matthew Distefano

The Myth of a Violent Jesus: Part 3, The Return 2018-03-17T14:56:39-06:00 Matthew Distefano

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Courtesy of Pixabay

This will be the final installment of “The Myth of a Violent Jesus” series. Parts 1 and 2 can be found by clicking these links:

Part 1: The Temple Incident

Part 2: Swords

In this final entry, we are going to discuss the mother of them all: The Return of Christ. We’ll conclude with a discussion about Jesus’ return because, well, a large number of Christians believe that if Jesus is violent at all, it will be on its fullest display when he comes back to kick ass and take—or, rather, leave off—names.

The most caricaturized interpretation of Jesus’ return comes from the director of the International House of Prayer, Mike Bickle. He chillingly envisions the following future scenario:

“Jesus is actually on the earth marching up to Jerusalem from Egypt, and then from the south through Jordan. He is killing his enemies . . . he actually kills millions of people. The time it takes to actually kill them takes time. He marches up through the land. It is a thirty-day process where he marches up from Egypt.”

Without a doubt, Bickle and those like him get this imaginative, and might I say grotesque, eschatological worldview directly from the book of Revelation. Indeed, we can all probably understand why. The language here, at times, is brutal, the imagery stark. And not only that, but all of the horror that is said to be coming is attributed to “the Lamb,” or in other words, Christ Jesus himself (Revelation 6:16). It’s a scary picture of God indeed!

However, as serious as we should take the warnings contained in this apocalyptic piece of literature, we shouldn’t be too fixated on drawing our theological conclusions from it. Why? Because it’s not the Gospel of Peace, as Paul called it (Ephesians 6:15). Hence, it needs to be read in light of the Gospel, not the Gospel read in light of our interpretation of this sometimes confusing-as-hell book (pardon the pun).

Remember, the true apocalypse of God is revealed by the first-century figure named Jesus of Nazareth, the figure whom God worked through to “reconcile all things” by freely offering forgiveness from the cross (Colossians 1:15–20; Luke 23:43), and by speaking the word of peace and mercy after it (John 20:19–23, 26; Hebrews 12:24). So, it is not as if in some future age this will fail to be. Of course not! For, as the writer to the Hebrews put it: “Jesus Chris is the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8). That is to say, our God is an eternal God (Genesis 21:33; Psalm 90:1–4).

Furthermore, if all this murderously retributive judgment stuff that Bickle talks about is indeed what Jesus is going to someday be all about, then the Bible is chalk-full of theological, anthropological, and ethical contradictions. And I don’t think the inerrantists even want to go there, do they?

First off, if Jesus is coming back to put Rambo’s body count to shame, then his whole Sermon on the Mount stuff is rubbish, a case of “do as I say, not as I’m going to do.” Bless those who curse you? Love your enemies? Be merciful as your heavenly Father is merciful?

(But don’t worry, someday I’m going to slaughter the hell out of mine?!)

Puh-lease!

On top of that, if bad-ass Jesus is coming to judge the world by kicking its collective ass, then his second judgment is completely unlike his first. How? John 12:31–33 tells us:

“’Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be driven out. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.’ He said this to indicate the kind of death he was to die.”

So, when is the judgment of this world? In the first century, when Jesus is lifted up on the cross. And what happened there? Jesus forgave those who were murdering him. To that end, Jesus doesn’t draw all people to himself so he can go all ISIS on them, he doesn’t bring people in close so he can ram his rusty sword through their abdomens, he draws them all to himself so he can offer forgiveness and mercy and grace and compassion and love.

I guess the ultimate question then is this: How do we explain all this violence and wrath talk that the writer of Revelation attributes to “the Lamb?” Well, I think we begin with Revelation 5.

Here, John is having a vision of “the end.” At first, things aren’t going so well because there is this scroll that must be opened, yet no one can open it. Tragic. Oh, but wait, then all of a sudden, this ferocious lion swoops in and tears it open with his giant paws, saving the day. Only that isn’t how the story goes. John doesn’t see a lion. He expects one, but it’s not to be. What does he see instead? A lamb, as if slain. That is to say, Christ crucified.

What a revelation this is! Sure, as lions are wont to do, Christ has conquered, but he has done so by behaving as a slain lamb.

Now, when we come to all the “wrath of the Lamb” talk in the following chapter, we must bear this in mind. Wrath, here, like in Paul’s letter to the Romans, is a very specific and nuanced wrath (cf. Romans 2:5). It is the giving over to the natural consequences of a humanity that refuses to care for the “least of these,” for one example (Matthew 25:31 – 46). Brad Jersak puts it like this:

“’The wrath of the Lamb’ is a metaphor for God’s consent (‘giving over’) to the intrinsic self-destructive consequences (natural and supernatural) of humankind’s rebellion. It is wrath because we experience these consequences in ultraviolent ways—as if God were angry—but the Lamb is only indirectly complicit because, he operates by Lamb-like consent rather than coercive intervention.”

This “giving over” is seen, most strikingly, all throughout Revelation 6. And, as Jersak notes, the calamity that takes place after the Lamb opens the seals is purely anthropological. It is humanity and her persistence toward violence, for example, that empowers the four riders: the white rider conquers with a bow, the red rider takes peace with a sword, the black rider’s economic scales are imbalanced, and the pale green rider, whose name was Death and Hades, kills with sword, famine, pestilence, and beasts of the earth. Then, after this doom befalls the world, the martyrs, like Abel long, long ago, cry out for vengeance (Genesis 4:10; Revelation 6:10).

Yet, none will come, for the blood of Jesus speaks a better word than Abel (Hebrews 12:24). Any vengeance that is coming, then, is only that which we have stored up for ourselves by our hard and impenitent hearts, as Paul once put it (Romans 2:5).

To that end, and as I said in the two previous posts, we must always remember to interpret these supposed “violence texts” through the lens of Jesus’ entire ministry, not the other way around. We mustn’t assume Jesus is going to one day drop back down to earth and contradict the Sermon on the Mount by murdering millions of people, as Bickle so disgustingly states, simply because someone had a vision about the so-called “end of the world” and we fail to understand the metaphors and allegories contained therein. That is not at all the point of Revelation, so please stop trying to say it is. In fact, like the incident in the Temple, and like the stories about Jesus and swords, the point of this book is quite the opposite.

If you want to dig much deeper into this topic, I have a book entitled Heretic! An LGBTQ-Affirming, Divine-Violence Denying Christian Universalist’s Responses to Some of Evangelical Christianity’s Most Pressing Concerns that is coming out April 1, 2018 (no, that is not an April fool’s joke). You will be able to get it from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and wherever books are sold. Oh, and for the month of April, the Kindle version will be a mere $0.99, while the royalties from softcover sales will go directly to the Preemptive Love Coalition. Check them out, please. They do a lot of great work.

Peace.

Eschatology

Theology

Violence

jesus

return of christ

violence

Previous Post



March 12, 2018

The Myth of a Violent Jesus: Part 2, Swords

Next Post



March 21, 2018 3 Questions for Annihilationists


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Book Review Early Church Eschatology eternal torment Hell Hermeneutics LGBTQ+ Mimetic Theory Mysticism News Old Testament Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Religion Sacrifice Satire Soteriology Theology Uncategorized Violence

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 June 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Paul's companion on his first missionary journey?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Luke Silas Timothy Barnabas

Books by This Author Books by All Set Free

See All Titles »

Related posts from All Set Free

Family

Addressing the Recent Heretic Happy Hour Podcast Episode

All Set Free

Family

I Debated Andrew Wilson, Here's What I Learned

All Set Free

Family

Reading Galatians Right

All Set Free

Family

An Evangelical Case for Trump as the Antichrist

All Set Free

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube