Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Allergic Pagan

Home
Pagan
Don’t Call Me A “Generic Pagan”

Don’t Call Me A “Generic Pagan”

Last updated on: June 28, 2016 at 10:26 am by John Halstead

Don’t Call Me A “Generic Pagan” 2016-06-28T10:26:41-05:00 John Halstead

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m not a Wiccan. I’m not a Witch. I’m not a Druid. I’m not a Heathen. I’m not a Polytheist. I’m not a Shaman. I’m not a Reconstructionist.

I am a Pagan.

What kind of Pagan? Well, I practice an archetypal polytheism and a naturalistic animism. That’s a bit of a mouthful. It doesn’t flow off the tongue like “Witch” or “Druid”. So I just say “Pagan”. I’m happy to explain what archetypal polytheism and naturalistic animism mean and the really interesting intersection of the two … but that’s a topic for another day.

But please, please do not call me a “generic Pagan”. And please do not refer to my rituals as “generic Paganism”.

There’s always been a tension between Pagans who define themselves primarily as Pagan, and those for whom “Pagan” is a secondary identifier, an umbrella term. Many people in the latter category refer to those in the former as “generic Pagans”.

“Generic Paganism” is such an odd term. Nobody talks about “generic Christianity” or “generic Hinduism”. There are, of course, “non-denominational” Christians, those who identify primarily as Christian, in contrast to many denominational Christians who identify primarily with their denomination, i.e., Catholic, Mormon, Baptist, etc., and secondarily as Christian. But no one refers to the former as “generic Christians”.

Everyone’s religious identity is specific, including those Pagans who don’t identify as Wiccan, Druid, Shaman, etc. We don’t have denominations in Paganism, per se, so it’s inaccurate to speak of “non-denominational Paganism”. But people do often analogize the different Pagan paths and traditions to Christian denominations, because there is a rough correspondence.

We might speak of “Neo-Paganism” or “eclectic Paganism” or “non-traditional Paganism”, but each of these terms is actually describing something slightly different. “Neo-Paganism” is a term that is useful for distinguishing reconstructionist and revivalist forms of Paganism from more prospective or forward-looking forms of Paganism. But “Neo-Paganism” includes much of contemporary Wicca, Druidry, and Shamanism, too (i.e., ADF is a Neo-Pagan Druid tradition), so it’s not useful for distinguishing those who don’t follow one of those paths from those who do.

“Eclectic Paganism” is another term that can be useful, but it can be a misleading term too. “Eclecticism” is sometimes used by traditionalists or reconstructionists to imply a lack of rigor or authenticity, which is not always accurate. The line between traditionalists and eclectics is a fuzzy one sometimes. After all, at some point, all traditions were eclectic. What really distinguishes us is how conscious we are of our eclecticism.

Likewise, “non-traditional Paganism” is another useful term, but one that doesn’t really help here either. When people talk about “generic Paganism”, they’re often talking about the rituals at Pagan festivals and conferences and CUUPs (Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans) gatherings. This kind of Paganism isn’t really “non-traditional”; it is its own tradition, one heavily inspired by Wicca, but not to be confused with Wicca. Some people have taken to calling this tradition “Wiccanate Paganism” or “Neo-Wiccan Paganism”. It follows a familiar formula: grounding, casting a circle, invoking the quarters, raising energy, etc.

Oftentimes, when people speak of “generic Pagan” ritual they are describing not just the form, but the quality, of a Pagan ritual. In the interest of an inclusivity that is never really achieved, planners of public Pagan rituals often default to a “Wiccanate” ritual format that is familiar, but also tired. The lack of creativity and ritual innovation at many public Pagan events is largely responsible for the appellation “generic”; it is “generic” because it is bland and boring. This is what makes the phrase “generic Paganism” so offensive. Not all so-called “generic Pagans” are Wiccanate. My own Paganism is highly specific, even idiosyncratic. I don’t cast a circle or call the quarters. I follow a Wheel of the Year, but it is specific to my bioregion and my psychology. And I don’t think there’s anything “generic” about it.

So, what kind of Pagan am I? I’m not a Wiccan or a Witch or a Druid or a Heathen or a Polytheist or a Shaman or a Recon. I’m Pagan. (Note I didn’t say “just a Pagan”, since that implies a inferior quality too.) Admittedly, that doesn’t tell you very much. There’s not a familiar box that I fit into. But if you’re really interested in getting to know me, and not just fitting me in a linguistic box, then let’s have tea sometime, and I’ll explain.

In the meantime, let’s stop using the term “generic Pagan”. If it’s a Wiccanate ritual, they call it that. If it’s a boring ritual, then call it that. But if it’s something that doesn’t fit into any of our standard Pagan categories (Wiccan, Feri, Druid, etc.), then don’t call it “generic”. Call it “Pagan” or don’t call it anything at all, at least until you ask some more questions and understand it better.

Previous Post

June 17, 2016

Shape God, Shape Change, Shape Gun Control Legislation

Next Post

June 29, 2016 Is There a Place for God in Paganism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ritual Scripts Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for using the term "General Conference"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Seventh-day Adventists Presbyterians Lutherans