Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Allergic Pagan

Home
Pagan
Fruits of the Deep Ecology Tree: Re-Enchantment

Fruits of the Deep Ecology Tree: Re-Enchantment

Last updated on: October 13, 2014 at 8:11 am by John Halstead

Fruits of the Deep Ecology Tree: Re-Enchantment 2014-10-13T08:11:30-05:00 John Halstead

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Neo-Paganism is a nature religion which, like other nature religions, perceives nature as both sacred and interconnected. From this perspective, humans in the developed world have become tragically disconnected from nature, which has been desacralized in both thought and deed. Healing this rift is possible only through a profound shift in our collective consciousness. This constellation of ideas can be called “Deep Ecology”. This is the second in a 5-part series about some of “fruits” of Deep Ecology. This essay was originally published at Neo-Paganism.com.

Have I not known the sky and sea Put on a look as hushed and stilled As if some ancient prophecy drew close upon to be fulfilled?” — “The Mystic” (poem) by Don Marquis

The world is too much with us; late and soon,
Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers:
Little we see in Nature that is ours;
We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!
The Sea that bares her bosom to the moon;
The winds that will be howling at all hours,
And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers;
For this, for everything, we are out of tune;
It moves us not.–Great God! I’d rather be
A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn;
So might I, standing on this pleasant lea,
Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;
Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea;
Or hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn.

— William Wordsworth

“The re-enchantment of the world” is a phrase which is used frequently by Neo-Pagan authors. The corresponding phrase “disenchantment of the world” was coined by Max Weber. Weber was influenced Friedrich Schiller, who wrote about die Entgotterung der Natur, the “de-godding of nature.” The re-enchantment of the world refers to the return of a sense of mystery to the world or to a sense of our participation in that mystery through our non-intellective, imaginative faculties. Re-enchantment is a countercultural response to a reductionist and positivistic science which views nature (including human beings) as mechanism and a capitalism which reduces nature (including human beings) to commodity and resource.

In The Reenchantment of the World (1984), Morris Berman explains the origin of the disenchantment of the world:

“The view of nature which predominated in the West down to the eve of the Scientific Revolution was that of an enchanted world. Rocks, trees, rivers, and clouds were all seen as wondrous, alive, and human beings felt at home in this environment. The cosmos, in short was a place of belonging. A member of the cosmos was not an alienated observer of it but a direct participant in its drama. His personal destiny was bound up with its destiny, and this relationship gave meaning to his life. This type of consciousness — which I shall refer to in this book as ‘participating consciousness’ — involves merger, or identification with one’s surroundings, and bespeaks a psychic wholeness that has long since passed from the scene.

“The story of the modern epoch, at least on the level of mind, is one of progressive disenchantment. … The scientific mode of thinking can best be described as disenchantment, nonparticipation, for it insists on a rigid distinction between observer and observed. Scientific consciousness is alienated consciousness; there is no ecstatic merger with nature. … The logical endpoint of this worldview is a feeling of total reification: everything is an object, alien, not-me; and I am ultimately an object too, an alienated ‘thing’ in a world of other, equally meaningless things.”

We have become Herbert Marcuse’s “One Dimensional Man”. To facilitate a scientific understanding of the world, humankind sought to separate itself from nature, to step “outside” of natural phenomena and become observers of the world, to see the world as an object. But this became not just a scientific method, but our ordinary, everyday consciousness. The result is psychological, social, and environmental sickness. The fruits of this disenchanted paradigm are individual neurosis, social alienation, and environmental degradation. Albert Raboteau describes the experience of disenchantment this way:

“The world becomes flattened, surface, ordinary, spiritless. And in response we succumb to the pseudo-enchantment of addiction to entertainment, to food, to alcohol, to sex, to possessions — out of our deep innate hunger for mystery, for spirit, for glory. Like Esau, we trade our birthright. We settle for glittering treasure, dragon bait, but then the dragon wakens and eats our souls. We become the hollow men and women that T. S. Eliot described. We may not know how to name it, but we are no less deprived, impoverished, hungry. The gnawing feeling that our lives ought to be more possesses us. And we are right.”

Berman explains that this disenchantment is a loss of a sense of essential participation in the world, which would mean that a re-enchantment would be a return of that sense of participation. In her book, The Nature of Magic, Susan Greenwood explains that “re-enchanting the world” means overcoming cultural alienation and to relating to nature as a living cosmos with an expanded awareness of our participation in the natural world, similar to what Levy-Bruhl calls the “participation mystique” and Owen Barfield calls “original participation”. In “Constructive Postmodernism”, John Cobb describes this re-enchantment in this way, “Instead of a world of dead, passive, valueless matter, we inhabit a world of living, active, intrinsically valuable occasions. Instead of alienation from a merely objective world, we experience kinship and participation in nature.”

Neo-Pagans seek to re-enchant the world through ritual and other religious practices, especially those practices which connect us with our non-intellective faculties, our senses and imagination, our physical environment, and especially our bodies. It is in our bodies that the self and the world, the subjective and the objective, blend imperceptibly together. Our bodies are, in a sense, the door which leads out of our solipsistic mind and opens onto the world. Adrian Harris argues that we must move beyond ratio-linguistic ways of knowing to the “direct experience of a wholeness rooted in the body”, what he calls “embodied knowing”. This can occur, he says, through good sex or ecstatic ritual.

original participation

Paganism

participation

participatory consciousness

Previous Post

October 11, 2014

Fruits of the Deep Ecology Tree: Interconnectedness

Next Post

October 15, 2014 Fruits of the Deep Ecology Tree: Pantheism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ritual Scripts Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who parted the Red Sea?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joshua Moses Aaron God