Where I went wrong: Virtual sacred space

Last updated on: February 19, 2014 at 9:12 pm by John Halstead

Where I went wrong: Virtual sacred space 2014-02-19T21:12:29-05:00 John Halstead

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bid the invaders take the shoes from off their feet, for God is here within.

— Emerson, “Self-Reliance”

I’ve had an epiphany. For some time, I have struggled to understand why certain hard polytheists seem to feel threatened by the very presence of non-theists in the comments sections of their blogs. P. Sufenas Virius Lupus, for example, has been very clear that he considers it inappropriate for non-theistic Pagans come into his virtual space by commenting. Each time I have read this, it just went over my head. I didn’t get it. I mean, it’s the internet, right? Blogs are a public spaces. If you want to have a private conversations, there are online forums where you can do that, where you can quite effectively exclude others. That’s what I thought.

What I did not realize is that at least certain polytheists consider their blogs to be sacred space. Sacred space is something that I understand as a Pagan. And I respect it. But for some reason, I had not considered the possibility of virtual sacred space. (Welcome to the 21st century, John.) This finally hit home when I saw a recent comment by PSVL on the Anomalous Thracian blog:

“… when non-polytheists keep coming into our spaces (which, speaking for myself and the Aedicula Antinoi blog, are virtual shrines to our various gods, and thus are sacred spaces to those gods and not just ‘public forums,’ thus conduct in them by everyone is expected to respect those gods) and telling us what they think, and by just stating it in our spaces …”

I read this, and I thought, “Holy sh*t! I have tread on someone’s sacred ground.” As a Pagan, I consider that to be … well, a sin. I should not have been that surprised. After all, PSVL’s blog is titled, “Aedicula Antinoi: A Small Shrine of Antinous” (emphasis added). But, for whatever reason, it didn’t occur to me that e was being literal about it being a shrine.

The anomalous Thracian made a similar comment, analogizing commenting on his blog to coming into his house and sharing uninvited opinions. That would be a violation. After all, a person’s home is sacred space to them.

So what happens then is this: I, the naive non-theistic Pagan, wander into a virtual shrine to the gods, a temenos, if you will, mistaking it for a community meeting place, an agora. My very “presence”, in the form of my questions or comments, no matter how carefully phrased, is a violation. Polytheists for whom the space is sacred respond with the emotion one would expect in response to an act of desecration, while I just think they’re over-reacting to my innocent invitation to dialogue. And then everything spirals out of control from there.

This explains so much to me. I could never figure out why certain polytheists claimed they had been attacked, when I felt pretty confident that they were the ones doing the attacking. But I had invaded their sacred space. I had failed to show the respect that I would ordinarily show if the shrine were physical. And, in the 21st century, the fact that it is a virtual shrine really shouldn’t make a difference.

Now, we can argue about the appropriateness or feasibility of treating a blog as virtual sacred space, in contrast to a more closed virtual space, like a Yahoo group. But the fact is that PSVL, and I think Anomalous and others, do see their blogs this way. And I sure as hell am not going to barge into someone’s sacred space and argue with them whether or not it is sacred. While some polytheists I have interacted with recently may feel that I have more to apologize for, we can at least agree on this at least:

I have done you wrong, by coming into your sacred space uninvited and acting like I have a right to be there. I apologize sincerely. I apologize for not understanding this sooner. I will not, in the future, be commenting on blogs of hard polytheists unless I first confirm whether comments of non-believers are welcome.

Having said that, I do wish that, if other polytheists feel that their blogs are sacred space, they would indicate this in some way (as PSVL has done) for anyone who happens to stumble upon their blog unawares. Even PSVL might benefit from a more clear statement warning trespassers that they are on virtual sacred ground. A clear statement that the comments of non-believers are not welcome would be most effective, I think.

I will continue to (silently) visit the blogs of polytheists, because I am interested and my own practice has grown from reading what they write, and I don’t think that constitutes a “presence” (tell me if you think I’m wrong about that). I may comment on or even link to them sometimes here on my own blog. And I will continue to comment on the blogs of those hard polytheists who do welcome comments from non-believers. I sincerely hope that this may help avoid similar verbal conflagrations in the future.

Previous Post

June 10, 2013

Mea Culpa

Next Post

June 15, 2013 We're not all Amy B.: Meet some other non-theistic Pagans

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ritual Scripts Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "For me to live is Christ, and to die is gain"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Peter John Paul