Theapoetics

Last updated on: October 27, 2012 at 7:09 am by John Halstead

Theapoetics 2012-10-27T07:09:18-05:00 John Halstead

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I little while ago, I came across this guest post by Molly Remer at Feminism and Religion on theapoetics. Molly blogs at goddesspriestess.com on theaology and theapoetics. Molly describes theapoetics as a three-step process:

“Drawing directly from David Miller’s (a student of Hopper) three-fold conception of “theopoiesis,” I offer this similar three-fold understanding of theapoetics:

Stepping back—moving away from the classic blinders of Western understandings and theological or intellectual or theoretical constraints and becoming clear and open to the magic unfolding right in front of our eyes.
Stepping down—“in which the individual enters the darkness of mystery and is unable to construct meaning because the familiar tools of theology and metaphysics are no longer available” (Keefe-Perry)
Stepping through—emerging from the dark confusion and ineffability into a “re-poetizing of existence.” (Keefe-Perry)”

I found this intriguing, so I looked up Miller’s formulation of this three-step process and I found this quotation of Stanley Hopper by Miller:

“Another dimension in Zen recognizes movement in three steps: the great doubt, a meekness about our customary egoist ways of seeing; the great depth , a penetration into the abyss; movement through this brings us to the great wisdom. I’ve used a similar formula: the step back, so we can see the light under our feet ; the step down, which is a movement into the deep self; and through the useful tension between these two, the step through into what they call the great wisdom.”

from “Stanley Hopper and Mythopoetics” by David Miller. Miller goes on elsewhere:

“So, Hopper noted several things in summary: (1) When language fails to function at the metaphorical or symbolic levels, the imagination goes deeper, soliciting the carrying power or the archetype, translating the archetype from the spent symbolic systems into fresh embodiments; (2) What matters therefore in interpretation is the psychic depth which our modalities of identification achieve in imagination; and (3) Our theo-logic finally belongs to the realm of mytho-poetic utterance, hence, theo-logos is not theo-logic but theo-poiesis.

“One begins to sense the radical nature of this theopoetical understanding of the study of religion when Hopper outlines three moments of its anatomy in the essay on “Le cri de Merlin” and in The Chautauqua Lectures. He reported in these works that theopoiesis is, first of all, a step back.” It is a step back from the metaphysical perspective of theologies of Western consciousness with their accompanying excesses: intellectualism, literalism, behaviorism, and supernaturalism. Paradoxically, this step back in understanding religion is aided by the experience of the failure of theology, a “failure” sometimes referred to as the Death of God.

“But the “step back” prompts a “step down.” As one is thrust backward upon the self, one also notices an inability to construe meaning. The bottom drops away, both psychologically and mythically, as in the Zen image of the bucket whose bottom must drop out. The resultant experience of darkness entails a suffering engagement with the unconscious. This darkness and its concomitant bottomlessness is requisite to and requires a third step, one which Hopper called the “step through.”

“The “step through” is a re-poetizing of existence. It is characterized by a profoundly and thoroughgoing poetic way of viewing. Hopper follows Philip Wheelwright in calling this view, not metaphoric, but “diaphoric.” It is not a “carrying across” of one thing onto another, but is a seeing through—diaphorically, diaphanously, diagnostically, diacritically. It not only means reading poetry. It means, especially, reading everything in life and work poetically. It does not mean stepping out of the depths through to anything else. Rather, it means walking through everything deeply, seeing through life deeply.”

from “Theopoiesis: A Perspective on the Work of Stanley Romaine Hopper” by David L. Miller.

I myself have experienced this three-stage process several times, to greater and lesser degrees: It starts when I begin to doubt my overly-intellectual ways of knowing the world or when traditional symbols have lost their meaning for me, which doubt or loss has led me to “step back” or “let go”, rather than clinging tenaciously to the past certainties. That step back leads to the bottom falling away and a descent to the abyss of unknowing. Miller and Hopper describe this as a “step down”, but it feels more like an involuntary plunge. And then, eventually, I find my way “through” the darkness, but this is not accomplished through logic, and it is not a return to the previous rationalistic certainties. Rather, it is through myth and poetry that life takes on new meaning. Life becomes “poetized” in this sense. In a future post, I want to delve further into what I mean by the “poetizing” of life.

Previous Post

October 20, 2012

Jung Resources for Pagans

Next Post

October 28, 2012 Lateral Transcendence: Toward Greater Compassion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ritual Scripts Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place in the Tabernacle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A stone wall A bronze door A curtain (veil) An incense altar