Polytheists on Christianity?

Last updated on: June 17, 2012 at 6:39 am by John Halstead

Polytheists on Christianity? 2012-06-17T06:39:42-05:00 John Halstead

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jason Mankey recently weighed in on the “atheist Pagan” controversy at his new blog “Raise the Horns”. By the way, I saw Jason at Pantheacon and he was easily one of the most interesting and entertaining speakers at the event. But I don’t want to talk about Jason’s post other than to say it is a good example of a response from a polytheistic perspective. And I don’t want to beat a dead ashvamedha either. But one one of the comments by Brian Rush to Jason’s post was really interesting and introduced a whole new dimension to the discussion. In his post, Jason had written: “I’ve drawn down deity on a number of occasions, and I think that the experience was far more than a trick of the mind.” It was to this comment that Brian responded:

This is a classic sole-alternative fallacy. The author here is presenting only two possibilities: that the deity being drawn down literally “exists” in some simplistic fashion, or a dismissive “it was all a trick of the mind.” There are more possibilities than those two.

This kind of thing is on my mind lately because I’m spending some time in company with devout Christians on a genuine spiritual quest in that framework. This is really helping me to separate intellectual ideas about what we do, from what we do and the Reality we do it with. I’ve had to dredge up all that old Christian language I used to employ years ago so as to communicate with these people, and to see through the morass of their intellectual beliefs ABOUT deity (with which I often don’t agree), and the truth presenting itself in their hearts and in their lives (which is quite clearly real).

I don’t believe in their God as they conceive Him. I don’t believe in the infallibility of their scriptures, as they do. I don’t believe in the special divinity of their founding prophet (although I do recognize his deep spirituality and wisdom). I don’t believe that the Cosmos thirsts for retaliatory blood, and so I don’t believe that It was appeased by Its son being tortured and put to death in a gruesome fashion. And I reject most of Christian sexual morality into the bargain.

Yet these (as I see them) totally wrong-headed and cockeyed intellectual beliefs don’t stop these Christian folks from experiencing genuine and powerful spiritual dimensions in their life, of a type that I can recognize very well.

Now what should that tell us? That the same applies to OUR ideas about the Reality underlying such experience. The response of the gods to an invocation is not something to be dismissed as “a trick of the mind.” It is very real, powerful, positive, and life-transforming. But at the same time, it’s a great mistake to suppose that we know, intellectually, what it is, and to put it into a simplistic this-not-that framework in the mind.

The Reality that gives rise to spiritual experience is what It is. Our ideas about it, whether monotheistic, polytheistic, or something else, are not that Reality. They are just our ideas about it. And our ideas about it can be (and probably are) wrong, without the Reality itself being made unreal just by that, anymore than the sun ceased to shine when our ancestors figured out that it wasn’t really a chariot being driven across the sky by Apollo.

(I should note that Jason responded to Brian by acknowledging that there is a range of possibilities between literalism and delusion.)

As I read this, I wondered how many of the polytheists who recently became irate at the questioning of their beliefs would afford Christians the same courtesy that they are asking for. If a polytheist claims that questioning the reality of the literal existence of a being known as Thor is out of bounds, I would ask if their commitment to tolerance is deep enough to include acknowledging the literal existence of Yahweh. Given the amount of anti-Christian animus I have seen coming from the Pagan community, I think I already know the answer.

There are a couple of things I take away from this:

1. This is for the atheists, non-theists, naturalists, pantheists, humanists, and anyone else who feels that the beliefs of others are a legitimate subject of critical inquiry: I think any critical discussion of this topic should begin with the genuineness of the experience of the people in question, whether they be polytheists, Christians, or whoever. The easy way out for naturalistist or atheists is to dismiss the experiences of others as self-deception. Such explanations are facile. We should be suspicious of any explanation that elevates us to an intellectual pedestal while dismissing the experience of the majority of human beings who have lived on the planet. (According to the Pew Forum, 80% of people say the believe they have received a response to a specific prayer request. And I suspect it would be higher if spiritual experience were defined more broadly.)

2. This is for polytheists, literalists, and anyone else who is sensitive to other people critically examining their beliefs: We need to distinguish between our experience and our interpretation of our experience. This is the real insight of Brian’s comment above. This is something I have had to deal with as I left my religion of origin. I had the most powerful spiritual experiences of my life in the context of the Mormon faith. While I admit that, in some instances, I was guilty of self-deception, I had other experiences whose genuineness I do not doubt even now. What I do question is my interpretation of those experiences. When a polytheist hears an atheist or pantheist questioning their beliefs, they should ask whether it is their experience or their interpretation of their experiences that is being questioned. And even though it makes us uncomfortable, our interpretations are a valid subject for critical discussion.

Previous Post

June 13, 2012

This I believe ...

Next Post

June 19, 2012 "The Wind, Silence, and Love"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ritual Scripts Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did Jesus heal the Centurion's servant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

With a word from a distance By laying hands By sending Peter Using oil