Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Cordial Catholic

Home
Catholic
Why Are Catholic Bibles Bigger?

Why Are Catholic Bibles Bigger?

Last updated on: June 17, 2020 at 2:43 pm by K. Albert Little

Why Are Catholic Bibles Bigger? 2020-06-17T14:43:19-04:00 K. Albert Little

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When I became a Christian at the age of fifteen one of the first things I did was bum a ride, from my Mom, to that local Christian bookstore.

Those were a thing back then.

I needed to buy a Bible. I had no idea where to start.

Half an hour later I walked out with an Extreme Teen Bible, New King James Version, in black bonded leather.

I had no idea back then that was I was participating in was a tradition. It was the tradition of a Bible: a collection of books and letters, bound between two covers, which was being handed on to me by the clerk at the store.

As a new Christian I knew that we considered the books of the Bible to be inspired and infallible but I never thought deeply about how that came to be. When that clerk handed me my Bible I didn’t stop to say, for example, “How do you know these are the books that belong in here?”

“Who decided on the Table of Contents?”

It didn’t cross my mind until more than a decade later when I began investigating church history. After all, somebody or some body had to decide which books of the Bible belonged and which didn’t. The Bible, completely intact, didn’t simply fall from the sky. It’s a collection of books.

So who, I asked, was the collector?

Who decided which letters of Paul were authentic and belonged? Who decided which Gospels were genuine and told the real story of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection? Which books of the Old Testament told the true story of our salvation history?

The answer to the question, from a perspective of history, is surprisingly straight forward. We have documents from the Early Church, from the first few centuries of church history, which paint a very clear picture. Church councils met and decided on which books they considered inspired by God and part of the canon based on what was handed down to them by the very first Christians, the apostles of Christ, who had even written some of the books that were included.

For other books, where it may not be so obvious, they dialogued and prayed and decided—guided, they believed, by the Holy Spirit into all truth.

But I learned too, as I began to dig into the history of my faith, that my Protestant Bible was different than what was used by Catholics (and Orthodox Christians, too).

My Bible was smaller, it contained less books than its Catholic counterpart.

Catholic Bibles were bigger.

It came as an absolute shock and I was determined to figure out what happened and how—seriously, how?!—could there be different versions of the Bible.

Recently, on the podcast, I was fortunate to sit down for a chat with Gary Michuta. Gary has literally written the book on the Bible and has some incredible insights into how the canon of Scripture—what got in and what was left out—came to be and, most importantly, why our Catholic Bibles were bigger.

It happened, says Michuta, during the Reformation and began with none other than Martin Luther himself.

Luther, pointing out what he saw as errors in Church teaching, began to break away from the authority and the leadership of what he saw as the corrupt Catholic Church. He had a point, many good points, which he’s said to have nailed to the door of a church in Wittenburg but when his new interpretations of Catholic theology began to be pressed, and challenged, he doubled down.

And as Luther began to question ideas long held by Christians like purgatory and the authority of bishops he began, also, to dismantle other ideas long held to be true like the canon of the Bible itself.

Spurred on by points of theology—purgatory, for example—which didn’t line up with his own understanding Luther began to question a selection of books in the Old Testament which seemed to support it. These books, called now the deuterocanonical books or the Apocrypha, take place in the time between the “last” of the prophets and the timeline of Jesus. A time which, as a Protestant Christian reading my Protestant Bible, we used to call the “Great Silence.”

Turns out God wasn’t so silent after all.

In questioning these books Luther appealed to ancient Christians like St. Jerome.

Jerome, the great translator of the Latin Bible, also questioned the validity of these books but, says Michuta, based on a fallacy. The Deuterocanonical books, written in Greek not Hebrew, seemed to be less credible to Jerome. They weren’t in Hebrew, after all, so they couldn’t be trusted as original to the Old Testament canon.

In fact, when Jerome compared the Greek Septuagint to the Hebrew Masoretic texts, he found what he perceived to be inconsistencies. Not only were some books included in the Septuagint which weren’t in the Masoretic canon but some books in the Septuagint collection were longer, which more and different parts.

But Jerome was wrong.

Even though Jerome was highly critical of these books, as he translated them, the Church was unrelenting in including these books in the Bible. It didn’t matter that some were in Greek and some were in Hebrew the Church was steadfast in what it identified as Scripture. The Church continued to use the Bible it had authoritatively decided upon—which included the deuterocanonical books; the Bible that the Church and all Christians in the West used in its liturgies, its celebrations, its worship services and Bible studies up until the Reformation.

Of course the Catholic Church continues to use this bigger Bible and in the East, where Bibles were always in Greek, the issue of languages raised by Jerome was irrelevant—as was the Reformation.

As we’ll see, Jerome was wrong. His Hebrew thesis, as noble as it may have been, was misguided and the Church knew it.

And, says Michuta, it isn’t even terribly difficult to prove his mistake.

“If you can discover what collection of Scriptures Jesus and the apostles handed down,” says Michuta, “then you have the inspired Old Testament Canon.”

After all, the writers of the New Testament would’ve had to write their messages down. These books of the New Testament, of course, were in written Greek but we can now do something, centuries later, that Jerome and even Luther couldn’t do: we can systematically compare what translation and what version these authors used when quoting the Old Testament.

Jerome questioned the deuterocanonical books because they were in Greek but did Jesus and the apostles?

As it turns out, not so much. The New Testament writers, says Michuta, overwhelmingly preferred the Greek Septuagint text. It was, he says, “their go to text.”

If the inspired writers of the New Testament saw fit to make use of the Greek translation of the Old Testament, a translation which included the deuterocanonical books, then why would Jerome know better?

But, of course, Jerome probably couldn’t have known. Not without an intensive textual comparison, something which is easily done now.

In fact, Michuta goes even further to say that without the deuterocanonical books some portions of the New Testament don’t make sense. These portions, like the nod to a Jew being martyred for believing in the resurrection, make little sense without the context of the 1 and 2 Maccabees, included in the Greek Old Testament but missing from the Hebrew version.

Not only were the writers of the New Testament quoting from the Greek canon which included these books but they were, without dispute, referring to them as well. To the larger Greek Old Testament canon. To the books that make up our bigger Catholic Bible.

In the end, it comes down to a risk that every Christian must take. A wager, of sorts.

Do we trust that the Bible handed down to Christians since it was collected together in the 4th century? Or do we trust Luther, based upon St. Jerome, who threw into question the Greek books of the Old Testament canon?

If we trust Luther, and by extension, Jerome, we make the two a kind of “super Pope,” says Michuta. We give one solitary Bible scholar, a saint but not infallible, the authority to dictate which books belong and which ones don’t. In contrast, we must remember, to what the Church had handed down for a thousand years.

And, for me, I’m willing to bet on the side of history.

To listen to my full interview with Gary Michuta click here, or listen below.

Previous Post

June 17, 2020

064: What Catholics Really Believe About Purgatory (w/ Karlo Broussard)

Next Post

June 18, 2020 What Evangelicals Need to Know About Purgatory

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Appearances Christian Living Explaining the Faith Podcast Tough Questions Uncategorized Why I'm Catholic

Select a Month January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who walked on water besides Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Paul Moses Elijah

Support this
Column