BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
The Cordial Catholic
- Home
- Catholic
- How Can “Bible Only” Christians Trust Their Bible?
How Can “Bible Only” Christians Trust Their Bible?
Last updated on: January 22, 2019 at 11:17 am by K. Albert Little
How Can “Bible Only” Christians Trust Their Bible? 2019-01-22T11:17:29-04:00 K. Albert Little
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This article is part of the Tough Questions series. A series highlighting some of the difficult questions I was asking during my conversion from a non-denominational Christian to full communion with the Catholic Church. For more about my own conversion story, read What I Wish I Knew About Catholics (And Why I’m Becoming One).
As a non-denominational Christian, I had a passing knowledge that Catholic Bibles were bigger. I knew that they contained more books and we referred to these books as the “apocrypha” but I didn’t really understand what they were all about. It seemed to me that Catholics had “added on” to the Bible—the Holy Word of God—in the same way that Mormons did with their extra-biblical narratives or in the way the Jehovah’s Witnesses tampered with translation to make their theologies fit.
Clearly, I had no clue.
When I dug into the history of Christianity and, in particular, Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation, I came face to face with some pretty tough questions about how I’d understood the Bible up to then.
In particular, I was forced to confront the question of how I knew I could trust the Bible I held in my hands; the Bible which was the be-all-and-end-all of my understanding of God and Jesus Christ His Son.
How could I trust that the Bible I had was the “right” Bible? That it contained everything God wanted me to know.
Something About the Septuagint…
In my reading and research about the Reformation I came across something known as the Septuagint. The Septuagint was a Greek translation of the Old Testament read by Jewish believers. It was a particular collection of writings which included what I understood to be the “apocryphal” books. At this time, in the middle ages, several different versions of the Hebrew Old Testament canon actually existed and which canon was widely read depended on region and religious sect. In other words, in different parts of Europe and the Middle East, different Hebrew Bibles were used.
At the time of the Protestant Reformation, as Luther and the reformers sought to print and distribute copies of the Bible they faced the challenge of knowing which Old Testament canon to translate and print. Diarmaid Macculloch, a Reformation scholar, writes that the Jewish believers that crossed Luther’s path preferred the Masoretic canon over the Septuagint. The Masoretic text did not include the “apocryphal” books but because the Masoretic text was what the Jews that Luther knew were using, he held it to be a more authentic choice.
So, despite a long tradition of Christians affirming these 7 books in the Bible, Luther’s widely read and distributed version had seven fewer books in its Old Testament than previous, popular translations.
What Luther Didn’t Know…
Martin Luther’s successful and popular Bible did a great deal to empower Christians to know and read the Word of God. Although history shows that his efforts are probably overstated—the Catholic Church had actually been translating and distributing the Bible as well—the massive popularity of the Bible in the common language created seismic shifts in the Christian Church.
But Luther’s translation was tricky and decision to promote a “smaller” Bible suffers four devastating blows in the light of history.
1. Other Jews used the Septuagint
Luther chose not to include seven books of the Old Testament because, scholars say, the Jewish believers he knew didn’t have them in their canon. But what Luther didn’t know was that Jewish believers elsewhere in Europe and the Middle East did. Luther was a product of his time, after all, and the medieval world could be a small place. In other parts of the world, outside of Luther’s limited purview, the Septuagint was widely in use. Those seven books of the Bible were the inspired Word of God for Jewish believers.
2. The Church Fathers used the Septuagint
Likewise, the Early Church Fathers, those Christians that followed the apostles appointed by Christ referenced, referred to, and even quoted from the Septuagint version of the Old Testament. At the time, in medieval Europe, Luther wouldn’t have had the same access to these ancient Christian writing that we do today but these Christians, very close to the original source of Christ Himself, believed in an Old Testament canon that included the seven books which Luther removed.
3. The Apostles Used the Septuagint
But the Early Church Fathers were only playing follow the leader, of course, because a critical study of the letters of the Apostle Paul demonstrate clearly that he too was using the Septuagint translation when quoting the Old Testament. As with the Christians that came immediately after him, Paul’s version of the Old Testament was the Septuagint.
In a famous piece of Scripture Paul even writes to Timothy, his disciple, that “all Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16-17). What Scripture is Paul referring to? Remember, the New Testament didn’t yet exist. Paul was referring to a Scriptural canon that included the seven “apocryphal” books.
4. Jesus Used the Septuagint
Finally, it should be obvious that if the Early Church used it and if the Apostles used it then they must’ve got the idea from somewhere, right? Certainly, because Jesus Himself used the Septuagint as well.
Incredibly, critical biblical research demonstrates without a doubt that the version of the Old Testament which Jesus regularly quotes is, in fact, the Septuagint. God Himself, indeed, quotes a version of the Hebrew Bible which includes the seven “apocryphal” books.
I don’t think we can get any closer to the source than this.
So Why Does it Even Matter?
As I was exploring my faith and digging, especially, into the history of the Bible I was shocked to discover the roots of the Catholic vs. Protestant Bible debate. I was dismayed to learn that scholars pin the removal of the seven “apocryphal” books from Luther’s translation on the fact that Luther didn’t think Jewish believers actually revered them. Because the Jews in Luther’s part of the world didn’t read them, even those elsewhere they were widely read.
I was surprised that this was all it took to create two different, disparate, versions of the Bible.
And I faced the tough question of figuring out how I was supposed to trust that the Bible I held in my hands was the complete thing. That it was all God wanted me to have to equip me to live out my faith.
Because if Luther can remove seven books—books which were clearly important to other Jews, the Early Church, the Apostles, and Jesus Himself—how do I know that what I have in my hands is right and complete?
Because, ultimately, the Bible did not come handed down from God with a divine table of contents. The decision of one figure of the Reformation, evidently, can alter it rather distinctly so that we end up, 500 years later, with two critically different versions of what Protestants and Catholics both view as the complete and unalterable Word of God.
So, it matters.
And on my journey out of non-denominational Christianity and into the Catholic Church I realized that, on the Bible, I would have to put more faith in the version which was, for 1,500 years, in wide distribution. A version that was quoted by the Early Church, by the Apostles, and used by Christ Himself, than in a version which had been edited much later. On the Bible, then, I had become Catholic. The rest of it would follow.
Previous Post

January 13, 2019
Three Tough Questions to Ask "Bible Only" Christians
Next Post

January 23, 2019 Is Fake News Keeping Good Christians From Becoming Catholic?
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Appearances Christian Living Explaining the Faith Podcast Tough Questions Uncategorized Why I'm Catholic
Select a Month January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
In Jude, what are believers told to build themselves up in?
Select your answer to see how you score.
The fear of the Lord The knowledge of God Their most holy faith Christian community
Support this
Column

Related posts from The Cordial Catholic
230: One Heck of a Conversion Story (w/...
229: Can Catholics and Evangelicals Agree on How...
227: What was Medieval Catholicism Really Like? (w/...
204: The Great Big Protestant Problem with Scripture...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action
Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...
It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters
One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...
Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon
Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...
5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes
Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...
Credo: A Story of God Told with the...
About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...
The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought
The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











