New York Times op-ed on hijab

Last updated on: July 16, 2012 at 1:04 am by Svend White

New York Times op-ed on hijab 2012-07-16T01:04:31-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There’s an unexpected signed op-ed in The Gray Lady defending hijab. Indian Muslim woman’s rights activist, Ayesha Nusrat reflects on the benefits off wearing hijab, two months after adopting it, in “The Freedom of the Hijab.”

I respect hijab, but don’t consider it fard (obligatory) today.

Nusrat makes some profound points:

In a society that embraces uncovering, how can it be oppressive if I decided to cover up? I see hijab as the freedom to regard my body as my own concern and as a way to secure personal liberty in a world that objectifies women. I refuse to see how a woman’s significance is rated according to her looks and the clothes she wears. I am also absolutely certain that the skewed perception of women’s equality as the right to bare our breasts in public only contributes to our own objectification. I look forward to a whole new day when true equality will be had with women not needing to display themselves to get attention nor needing to defend their decision to keep their bodies to themselves.

In a world besotted with the looks, body and sexuality of women, the hijab can be an assertive mode of individual feministic expression and rights. I regard my hijab to be a commanding question of “I control what you see, how is that not empowering” mixed with a munificent amount of authority emanating from the “My body is my own concern” clause. I believe my hijab gives me the right to assert my body, femininity and spirituality as my own and under my authority alone.

Back in 2004, I made some kindred observations on the occasion of a hijab ban in France: “When chosen freely, it is … a badge of empowerment, a radical blow against a world that objectifies women.”

Her piece is eloquent and thoughtful, even if I don’t find that it covers any new ground philosophically. There is one interesting aspect: Unlike most defenses of hijab by Muslims, she focuses on surprisingly instrumental arguments rather than its presumed inherent traits or blessings. The emphasis is put on hijab as a tool for dispelling stereotypes about Muslim women as opposed to it as an end in itself.

Yes, my hijab is a visual religious marker that makes it very easy for anyone to spot me in a crowd as a separate entity representing or adhering to a particular religion. This is all the more reason why, being a hijabi in the public arena is an escalating force that drives me to work in ways that would help break the undignified stereotypes, barriers and prejudices that my Islamic faith is relentlessly and irrationally associated with. As an extension of my personality and identity, it instigates me to challenge the misconception that Muslim women lack the bravery, intellect and resilience to challenge authority and fight for their own rights.

In a way, it seems like circular reasoning to me–i.e., I wear hijab because doing so helps me to attack stereotypes about Muslim women (who mostly wear hijab)–but that’s none of my concern and, besides, one can never fault somebody for being motivated by a sense of solidarity with others.

While I certainly appreciate its constructive message–which will no doubt inspire screams of outrage and bloody dhimmitude from the Islamophobe peanut gallery–the piece seems a bit like a bolt out of the blue and I wonder how convincing most people will find it. I’d love to know how this piece found its way to the New York Times opinion pages, which are legendarily difficult to get into. Is it responding to something I’ve missed in the news recently?

Legos

Previous Post

June 3, 2012

Bringing the Greater Jihad to the Silver Screen

Next Post

July 16, 2012 Are you doing your part to support the few media that support us?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, 'For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life'?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter James John Paul