Continuity & Sci-Fi

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:47 pm by Svend White

Continuity & Sci-Fi 2013-05-07T18:47:43-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s a entertaining and wide-ranging essay ("The Science of Consistency:

On fictional universes and the fans who rationalize them" by Todd Seavey) by a sci-fi buff about the challenge of maintaining continuity in science fiction and how inevitable such mistakes are in a fictional creation of any scale.

Shabana is periodically taken aback when I take great umbrage at some "minor" mistake on her part concerning the key narratives of sci-fi/fantasy–I’d share them, but they’re too painful to recount–so I can relate to this quip:

The fictional universes depicted in movies like the Star Wars or Star Trek series tend to get very complex (for beginners: the former features Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader, the latter Captain Kirk, the Enterprise, and a loyal crew made up of people like engineer Scotty; if you get them mixed up, you are worthless).

I wouldn’t go that far–I am a tolerant person, after all–but such mistakes clearly indicate that one has been out of touch for too long with the holy texts of the genre.

The author also captures perfectly the different psychological import of continuity questions for the diehard fan and the average person:

That complexity means that—inevitably—the occasional “continuity error” occurs. In normal movie parlance, a continuity error means one of those embarrassing moments when, say, the bandage on an actor moves from the right hand to the left hand between scenes due to a mistake by the makeup department. For science fiction fans, though, continuity refers to the overall logical and historical coherence of our beloved fictional universes.

*If Scotty witnesses Captain Kirk’s death at the beginning of Star Trek VII, it is extremely troubling to some of us—those who care, those who have intellectual integrity and the discipline of logic!—if Scotty is awakened from suspended animation approximately seventy years later in an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation and asks whether Captain Kirk is still alive. Scotty should know that Kirk isn’t! **Something is wrong! It doesn’t add up—*yet it must! It must!

There are many other gems of insight and deliciously nerdy examples of continuity objections, mostly concerning Star Wars and Star Trek. Here’s an unexpected example from a different genre:

The TV show Dallas famously erased an entire season by claiming it had all been a dream (though they neglected to make changes in the spin-off show Knot’s Landing, on which characters briefly mourned for a Dallas character killed off during the erased “dream season”).

And here’s an interesting observation that explains the constant temptation in comics to trample on continuity:

there is a constant tension in comic books between the desire for the characters to accumulate interesting historical baggage and the desire to retell their basic, streamlined stories and this time get it right*.*

So it’s worth a read if you’re interested in such things.

While we’re talking about continuity, here’s my own catch (and one that I haven’t seen anybody else mention, perhaps because it’s too trivial).

I think Star Trek Next Gen changed its approach to the reintroduction of the Romulans.

In a relatively early episode of STNG, Episode 26: "The Neutral Zone" (Boy, the web makes research easy sometimes. All that took was a Google search under "’star trek next generation’ romulans reintroduction" to dig up the episode in question.), the Federation re-encounters the Romulans again after the treat ending a long war centuries earlier. Without getting into the plot (which you can see at the link provided), the interesting thing was that the way that Romulan bird of prey was portrayed as utterly dwarfing the Enterprise in size. When it decloaked dramatically, it must have been 10 times larger. I think that and the ominomous tone of the exchange between Picard and the Romulan captain clearly implied that the Romulans had outstripped the Federation in terms of technological development and that, consequently, the Federation was in trouble. In subsequent episodes, however, birds of prey were normal sized and Romulans were otherwise portrayed as being on the same footing technologically as the Federation. I detect a change in the geopolitical backdrop.

I welcome comments from fellow believers. In sci-fi, not Islam. (What do Avari-Nameh and Von Aurum think, I wonder?)

The essay got me wondering about what comparable continuity slips exist in the great universes of fantasy literature, especially that of JRR Tolkien. Between the Hobbit, the Lord of the Rings, and The Silmarillion, there must be a mountain of logical and historical contradictions. Two decades ago when I subscribed to a mimeographed Tolkien fan zine–yes, I was a nerdy teen–I remember reading some examples, but can’t remember them now. Anyone out there have any interesting examples of the Good Professor nodding?

Science Fiction

Star Trek

Previous Post

July 9, 2006

"Europe's Mosque Hysteria"

Next Post

July 14, 2006 Alan Wolfe on American conservatives' inability to govern

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last judge of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gideon Samuel Samson Eli