Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Akram's Razor

Compelling new evidence against Danish government’s handling of the cartoons

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:47 pm   by Svend White

Compelling new evidence against Danish government’s handling of the cartoons 2013-05-07T18:47:43-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Have been too busy to blog lately, alas.

A quick update on the Danish cartoon controversy.

Just got my hands on a great new book by Rune Engelbreth Larsen and Tøger Seidenfaden called Karikaturkrisen: En undersøgelse af baggrund og ansvar  ("The Cartoon Crisis:  An Study of its background and responsibility") which pretty much demolishes the government’s justifications and much of the conventional wisdom about the Danish imam’s supposedly inflammatory contribution to the crisis.

Haven’t read the whole thing yet and don’t have time to translate anything from it at the moment, but suffice it to provides considerable evidence to prove that:

  1. The government of Anders Fogh Rasmussen had ample opportunity to nip this crisis in the bud over a period of half a year.
  2. The early Muslim response did not demand government censorship.  The October 2005 letter from Muslim ambassadors to the Prime Minister explicitly affirmed freedom of speech (and presciently warned of the danger of unrest in Muslim societies), as did even Egypt’s protest letter the following month to the UN.  All that was asked was for him to distance the government from Jyllands-Posten’s divisive PR campaign against Islam.  In other words, the argument that the Danish government had no choice but to rebuff Muslims because they were demanding that the government ignore Danish laws protecting speech are patently false.
  3. While the Danish imams did say some some things that’s weren’t entirely accurate in the heat of the controversy, there is no evidence that they sought to misrepresent the cartoons by including the infamous additional drawings.  These additional items were physically separated from the JP cartoons.
  4. They provide compelling arguments for the view that the imams
    and the dossier (i.e., with the JP cartoons and various other more
    offensive ones that Danish Muslims had encountered in Denmark) they
    distributed to leaders in the region did not contribute appreciably to
    the escalation of the conflict.  One interesting point they make is
    that most of the leaders they met were already quite familiar with the
    cartoons, so it is unlikely the additional drawings in any way misled
    them.
  5. Not only is it a myth that the Danish Muslim delegation whipped up the Muslim world into a frenzy against Denmark, they actually were instrumental in delaying the outbreak of the boycott.  They opposed a fatwa by Egyptian mufti Ali Guma urging a boycott.  The authors note that a senior Danish counterterrorism official publicly thanked them for their constructive and moderate role while in the Middle East.  They go on to state that there is considerable evidence for the view that the imams prevented the boycott from beginning two months earlier.  The boycott and mayhem did not occur until they’d returned to Denmark (and at a point at which the Danish government had had months to defuse the crisis).

Hope this book gets translated into English soon, as it provides so much important context that’s lacking from international coverage.

Even if you don’t agree with all the authors conclusions–though I don’t see how one could argue against them given the evidence they marshal–it’s hands down the most thorough study of the saga done to date.

It definitely puts the government in a bad light, not to mention supports my take on the sorry saga. 

Just finished an article for book on the controversy, btw.   More later.

The Danish cartoons

Previous Post



July 15, 2006

An unlikely "mole" breaks a terror cell in Canada

Next Post



July 30, 2006 Romulan technology on the way


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jairus" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord judges God is my portion Servant of God He enlightens

Related posts from Akram's Razor

Muslim

Palestinians return fire by trashing Danish flag

Akram's Razor

Muslim

Op-ed on Muslim boycott of Denmark

Akram's Razor

Muslim

Whose fault is the Danish boycott?

Akram's Razor

Muslim

Danes Finally Apologize to Muslims (But for the...

Akram's Razor

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Muslim

25 Years Later: How Much Has Changed for...

As we approach the 25th anniversary of September 11th, I’ve found myself...

Podcast: Third Spaces & The Rise of Yemeni...

  In the latest episode of The Artistic Foodies Podcast, hosts Abbas...

HalalFest Picks: Best 60 Halal Spots for Super...

  Back in 2016, I came up with a list of 29...

Unity Is America’s Strength — Division Is Its...

by Hidayatullah Ahsan When Valentina Gomez, a Republican candidate for Congress in...

Zohran Mamdani and New York’s Fight Against Islamophobia

This past June, against all odds, Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic primary...

What the Fourth of July Means to a...

As we mark another Fourth of July, millions of Americans will celebrate...

view all Muslim blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube