The usual dehumanizing (and absurd) assumptions about Muslims

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:41 pm by Svend White

The usual dehumanizing (and absurd) assumptions about Muslims 2013-05-07T18:41:30-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Commenting on the apparent coverup campaign by the Israeli military of its shelling of a Palestinian family that was picnicing on the beach, Jonathan Cook provides an excellent illustration of the unspoken dehumanizing assumptions of Muslims being congenitally irrational and prone to violence that infect so much coverage in the Western media. [HT: Mostly Water]

From "Israel Engineers Another Cover-Up" in CounterPunch:

The army has been claiming for more than a week, based on its own evidence, that the lethal explosion was not caused by a stray shell landing on the Gaza beach but most probably by a mine placed there by Palestinian militants to prevent an Israeli naval landing.

The army’s case could be dismissed outright were it not for the racist assumptions that now prevail as Western "thought" about Arabs and Muslims.

To be plausible the army account requires two preposterous assumptions: first, that Palestinian militants are so fanatical that they consider it acceptable to lay a mine secretly in an area frequented by local families; and second, that they are so primitive that their best military minds could not work out the futility of placing a single mine along miles of coastline that could be used for a landing (or are we to assume that there are many more of these mines waiting to explode?).

Unfortunately, this is far from the first time something like this has happened. Such "accidental" tragedies occur with distressing regularity.

How many times does Israel have to do something like this before observers realize that the "Israel merely defends itself while Arabs are bloodthirsty killers who like to blow up innocent people" perception of this tragic conflict is simplistic and out of touch with reality? (Actually, I think many, many observers do, but unfortunately they don’t have pull in Washington or Tel Aviv.)

I don’t sympathize with those who wage violence or terrorism, but spare me the high horse. There’s a whole lotta of terrorizin’ going around in this conflict.

I took a look at Mr. Cook’s website and found the following inspiring expression of his professional philosophy and commitment to speaking truth to power.

As an activist and reluctant denizen of the soundbyte-ridden and sycophant-filled Babylon that is the Washington Beltway, I vicerally relate to his concerns about the invisible political and ideological entanglements that accompany physical proximity to power.

It’s amazing all the ways location affects one’s political engagement (first and foremost in the case of the Beltway by often ending it, since activism and political engagement are unconducive to career advancement for an aspiring bureaucrat).

It helps you understand the wisdom of the tradition among Islamic scholars of avoiding government service and relying instead on charitable trusts (awqaf) for sustaining themselves economically. It was a remarkably savvy and modern political tradition that was abolished by the bearers of civilization and enlightenment a (i.e., European Colonial authorities), who transformed religious scholars into government servants. Sadly, most newly independent regimes retained this short-sighted, intellectually stifling arrangement after the end of Colonialism.

Jonathan Cook’s News Archive – Israel Palestine

Why my reporting is different

I have chosen to position myself in the region in two ways – one professional, the other geographical – that distinguish me from colleagues.

This approach gives me greater freedom to reflect on the true nature of the conflict and provides me with fresh insight into its root causes.
Professionally, I am one of the few journalists regularly writing about the region who work as an independent freelancer. I choose the issues I wish to cover, so I am not constrained by the ‘treadmill’ of the mainstream media, which require an endless flow of instant copy and analysis. I am also not tied to the mainstream agenda, which gives disproportionate coverage to the concerns of the powerful, in this case the Israeli and American positions – in the US media to a degree that makes much of their Israel/Palestine reporting implausible. I also rarely accept commissions, restricting myself to topics that I consider to be the most revealing about the conflict.

Geographically, I am the first foreign correspondent to be based in the Israeli Arab city of Nazareth, in the Galilee. Most reporters covering the conflict live in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, with a handful of specialists based in the West Bank city of Ramallah. The range of stories readily available to reporters in these locations reinforces the assumption among editors back home that the conflict can only be understood in terms of the events that followed the West Bank and Gaza’s occupation in 1967. This has encouraged the media to give far too much weight to Israeli concerns about ‘security’ – a catch-all that offers Israel special dispensation to ignore its duties to the Palestinians under international law.

Many topics central to the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians, including the plight of the refugees and the continuing dispossession of Palestinians living as Israeli citizens, do not register on most reporters’ radars.

Washington and the Middle East

Previous Post

June 22, 2006

Pentagon in 2006: Homosexuality a mental illness

Next Post

June 22, 2006 Comparing US Muslims to European Muslims

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the main language spoken by Jews during Jesus’ time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aramaic Latin Greek Hebrew