The problem with the Pulitzers & Islamic reform

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:41 pm by Svend White

The problem with the Pulitzers & Islamic reform 2013-05-07T18:41:34-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A profound analysis from a veteran journalist of the way American journalism today devalues its most important function through flashy awards and overemphasizing international affairs and high-falluting pontification.

Edward Wasserman: Prizes are trophies for rich papers

I’ve come to believe that the Pulitzers — for all the celebrity, the champagne, the career-capping glory they bring — are bad for the profession. They purport to stand for excellence in journalism, but if they do it’s in the same way that Rolls Royce stands for excellence in car-making.

And that’s the problem. The Pulitzers are big, clunky trophies for the rich. They honor lavish work that has no bearing on the reasonable strivings of most journalists, dazzling achievements that are a galaxy apart from the nimble municipal reporting that energizes a robust civic culture. They amplify a structure of dominance within the profession that sneers at the work of most newsrooms, and every year they send out the same, deeply wrong-headed message: that great journalism is primarily national and international in scope, and is practiced mainly by the country’s wealthiest news organizations.

In a way, his criticism of the priorities of contemporary journalism reminds me of the discourse of Islamic activism and reform. We’re always talking about Big Ideas, even though the real contributions are generally made not out in the ether of theory but on the ground of practice, dealing with concrete and sometimes numbingly mundane problems and issues. In a way, a real reformer is a glorified proofreader who periodically reviews tradition for inconsistencies or anachronisms (i.e., things that no longer apply) and then proposes to the author new language that attempts to resolve these problems with minimal changes to the text.

In my opinion, in normal circumstances real reformers don’t talk grandly about "reconstructing" religious thought, "islamizing" knowledge, or "reviving tradition" without explaining what that tradition is. They roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty with specific problems and issues. Such work is not as sexy, but it’s what makes a difference in the real world.

Incidentally, this is why I don’t like to join the lynch mobs that form against liberal Muslims[*] who go overboard when sincerely advocating reform. They may get important things seriously wrong–and if they do, they should be critiqued–but unlike some of their critics they’re at least talking specifics and trying, however imperfectly, to be part of a solution. When those who have the knowledge and wisdom to tackle these thorny issues remain silent (whether out of habit or out of deference to their peers), I think we have to make some allowances for the inevitably imperfect attempts of others to solve real problems.

I look forward to the day I don’t have to turn to liberals for open, concrete discussions of reform and renewal of Islamic tradition. When it’s the traditionalists who are leading important discussions about updating fiqh, as opposed to trying to torpedo them. Then I’ll be the most ferocious advocate of taqlid you’ve ever seen*.*

* No takfir is intended by this observation, but when I say "liberal Muslim" I mean somebody who advocates reform while believing in Islam in a reasonably traditional sense. Thus, I do not include secular Muslims or cultural Muslims under this rubric for these purposes. I’m referring to Muslims who consciously strive to base their solutions on authentic Islamic sources (which in addition to the obvious ones–Quran, Sunnah, subsequent scholarly tradition, etc.–includes reason and the common good). Not included are Muslim intellectuals who’ve just given up on Quran and Sunnah, or clownish mutant-provocateurs like Irshad Manji or Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Islam and the Left

Islamic Thought

The Corporate Media

Previous Post

May 11, 2006

Colbert b-slaps W and the Beltway (REPOST)

Next Post

May 16, 2006 The "Da Vinci Code" sapping some Christians' faith in orthodoxy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jairus" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord judges God is my portion Servant of God He enlightens