Op-ed on Muslim boycott of Denmark

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:41 pm by Svend White

Op-ed on Muslim boycott of Denmark 2013-05-07T18:41:50-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Thought I’d share a partial translation of a hardhitting and eye-opening op-ed by Danish social commentator, Rune Engelbreth Larsen about the international uproar and political and economic crisis facing Denmark over the infamous political cartoons denigrating the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in Jyllands-Posten .

Like me, he sees this PR disaster as self-inflicted by the Danish government and sees a lot of doublestandards at work here.

I’ve only translated/summarized the first few paragraphs. Will try to summarize the remainder eventually.

What a terrible situation for little Denmark. Every other headline in its newspapers these days is about the latest development in this geo-political nightmare.

The worst part is how unnecessary all of this is.

[Have to note that there is a more than passing physical ressemblance between the two of us, as the photo on his page shows.]

———————————————-

The JP cartoons, the boycott and the apology

In a more humanistic climate than that which prevails in
Denmark today, JP would never have dreamed of such an unnecessary and tasteless
provocation against Muslims as its demonizing cartoons of Muhammad, but then in
a more humanistic climate we would
naturally not have already been witness to Muslims being marginalized [in
Denmark] over 15 years of progressively humiliating rhetoric and propaganda
attacks.

In more humanistic climate than that of today, when JP turns
freedom of expression on its head, striking a blow for the “right” to humiliate a hard pressed [? not sure how to translate “trængt”] minority group in Denmark, one
would expect the Danish government to have understood the need to distance
itself from this form of demonization, but without limiting freedom of
expression.

This is especially true when one considers how often the
government’s ministers have demandedthat Muslims [in Denmark] collectively repudiate more radical Muslims when they do something
objectionable. But this obviously doesn’t
cut both ways. Instead, the government
has taken the most bizarre of all
position of all—the government’s position is that it has no position. […]

[In a more humanistic climate, the government would have at least
met with Muslim ambassadors, regardless of the latter’s expectations of such a meeting. There it could have explained that it did naturally
not condone such attacks against the dignity of a religious minority, even if
it could not interfere.]

[In a more humanistic climate, Danish Muslims wouldn’t have toured the Middle East with fake versions of the JP cartoons or otherwise embellished their account, but instead given a matter of fact account of the many years of discrimination and increasing disrespect they’ve faced in Denmark.]

[But that climate is nowhere to be found, of course, so we face a situation where the whole Muslim world is about to boycott Denmark and certain Islamic regimes find it convenient to support these “popular” expressions of outrage, in some cases with intense hypocrisy. JP should have used its freedom of expression to mock these regimes instead, as then it would have been in keep in with freedom of expression as it would have been aimed at dictators.*]

———————————-

* I assume that he’s referring to Turkey, whose ambassador to Denmark made an especially big stink about the cartoons. Turkey is indeed an unlikely defender of Islam’s honor, given its own schizophrenic relationship with Islam and its own abysmal record on religious freedom for its 99% Muslim population.

This is an ideal opportunity for all manner of unsavory Middle Eastern governments to score easy political points with their Muslim constituents.

Denmark

Muslims in the Melting Pot

The Danish cartoons

Previous Post

January 31, 2006

NYT on children, sex & the media

Next Post

February 1, 2006 Whose fault is the Danish boycott?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Ecclesiastes 12, what happens to the human spirit when a person dies?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It remains on earth It returns to God It is reincarnated It ceases to exist