Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Akram's Razor

Home
Muslim
The backlash continues

The backlash continues

Last updated on: May 7, 2013 at 6:41 pm by Svend White

The backlash continues 2013-05-07T18:41:00-05:00 Svend White

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The saga continues, alas.

Apparently, total agreement with (or silence concerning) Muqtedar Khan’s inconsistent politics is now

part of the Shahadah, and some people appear committed to browbeating me into recanting my heresy (last posting: "The Last Word on Muqtedar Khan and PMU").

Someone who signed on at July 26, 2005 12:13 AM as
MMamdani wrote a nasty comment (read it in its entirety here) that,
as eager as I am to move on, requires a response :

Akram, you now officially qualify as a stalker, a cheap, in ethical and devious, small minded individual, determined to malign one of the most important American Muslims voices in this country, and also one of the rising stars on the Islamic intellectual horizon.

I am a "stalker" now, for writing about a prominent (and very outspoken) media personality’s politics in my own blog.

Like many bloggers, I believe in something called free speech and holding
public figures accountable for their actions that affect the public. If that seems like reprehensible
bid’a to some, that’s simply not my problem.

This is the third or fourth time you have attacked Dr. Muqtedar Khan, and what is more indicative of your cheap character, you repeatedly delete all the responses that your readers make. Do you do this to all your posts or you have just deleted the defense of Dr. Khan by Muslims, some of whom were known scholars in the discipline of Islamic studies.

I deleted those postings because I decided that some of my language was
overly harsh (hardly a rare occurrence on the Internet, as one hurriedly types
message on the fly) and I needed to partly reword it to be more fair. Typepad
(the blogging service I use) doesn’t allow you to delete a message without
deleting its comments, so they are gone, as well..

In the spirit of open debate, though, I will see if I can’t repost all the
comments.

If you had left them they would have belied your false claims.

I didn’t find them particularly convincing as a rebuttal to my points, but you’re entitled to your opinion. Several were were non-sequiteurs ("He’s a great scholar of fiqh–How dare you criticize his politics??"), ad hominem attacks on me (I’m a "nobody’, a "hack", a "nurse" second-guessing a great surgeon, …), or vague appeals to emotion.

You constantly accuse him of blamign it all on isam and Muslims, well you are wrong and a liar!

Actually, I accuse him of inconsistency, of periodically writing things which make it easy for others to blame Islam and Muslims. He doesn’t do it himself (though his "Memo to American Muslims" came pretty close). So I accuse him of reinforcing many of the pernicious myths and doublestandards that permeate mainstream media coverage of Islam and Muslims. There’s a big
difference.

Here are some examples which ptove you entirely wrong, and yes they are not academic writings, they are op-eds written at the height of 9/11 fever in prominent media:

See for yourself [Akram will soon delete this posting to, the shameless hack!].

Fear of attack on Muslim civil Rights — fist by any Muslims as early as sept 17, 2001 in Detroint Free Press and Baltimore Sun:http://www.glocaleye.org/threatfreedom.htm

Attack on Bush again in Sept. 2001:
http://www.glocaleye.org/crusade.htm

Explaining the root causes of Muslim anger again in early 9/11 days, completely contrary to your claim that he blames it all on Muslims. I read this in Salon.com and have been a fan of his courage since then:

http://www.ijtihad.org/memoa.htm

I could go on and on: But these few examples should be sufficient.

Well, we obviously disagree.

I think his analysis tends to basicly serve established interests and crowd out sharper, more independent analysis. Imagine the good that would be done if the New York Times ran SoundVision’s Abdul Malik Mujahid’s painstakingly researched and eye-opening commentary on post-9/11 Muslim civil rights instead of Khan’s eloquent but ultimately toothless discussion in "putting the American in ‘American Muslim’".

[In a way, that NYT piece encapsulates this whole debate, as it is not without its insights and eloquence. It is the lack of additional perspectives in the mainstream media that makes it problematic. If it appeared in a media context where more critical voices like Mujahid’s were heard with some regularity, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. I wouldn’t feel like an opportunity had been lost for real dialogue, real debate about our problems. ]

First of all, there is the "Good Cop/Bad Cop"
routine I mentioned before, which if one accepts as a premise would explain much
of this. Second, I think a closer reading of his writings reveals their
dissent to be very safe and carefully limited in scope vis-a-vis the Beltway
consensus. This is actually rather tame stuff when you consider the gravity of the problems, misconceptions and doublestandards that are at work.

Unless someone wants to commission me to write an in-depth study, that’ll
have to suffice. I have other things to do with my time than parse these
essays line-by-line to satisfy critics.

Readers who wish to understood the extent of Akram’s perfidy and meanness can read Dr. Khan’s columns at www.ijtihad.org and www.glocaleye.org.

"Perfidy"! I think you’re getting a little carried away. Questioning MK’s politics is treasonous??

I also know that he regularly speaks at the annual conventiosn all the main American Muslim organizations, CAIR, MPAC, ISNA and works with them. It is indicative of the acceptance of his ideas by the community.
People Like Svend are nursing personal grudges,

Well, politics makes for strange bedfellows sometimes.

No, this isn’t personal. I find him quite likable and believe his
intentions to be good, but that doesn’t change how problematic some of his
politics are or how they need to be openly debated.

Also, if I was simply out to get him, I wouldn’t be writing this in my blog,
which is read by a handful of people. I’d be writing a systematic expose
for a publication (a la the Z Magazine piece).

perhaps they even maintain sectarian hatred since Akram is an Ahmadi Muslim and Khan a Sunni Muslim.

Aha, the plot thickens! Yeah, that’s a big problem. Something needs to be done about all these
Ahmadis running around persecuting Sunnis.

But, seriously, it’s interesting to see how the sectarian club is being
broken out here, even though this question has no bearing whatsoever on what I’ve written
about Khan, or the views and causes I’ve advocated elsewhere.

Talk about a cheap, ad hominem attack. I guess you can be a
liberal reformer and still play the same old takfir game.

Perhaps it’s a compliment. Resorting to this kind of below-the-belt
punch is generally a sign of being unable to respond to your
opponent’s arguments.

I’m not going to dignify this by getting into personal beliefs about secondary matters that are
open to interpretation and which are nobody’s business but my own,
but I will note for the record that I no Qadiani.

In fact, I am no less a Sunni
Muslim than Khan or anybody else is, as I believe in the Sunni Aqeedah,
including the Khatm an-Nabiyin (the Finality of Prophethood). And I accept Hazrat Abu Bakr as-Saddiq (ra),
Hazrat Umar Farooq (ra), Hazrat Uthman Ghani (ra), and Hazrat Ali ibn Abu Talib (ra).

Ergo, I am a Sunni Muslim.

Let us see if he deltes this post and writes another last word on Khan.

You’ll notice that I haven’t at any point chosen to disable comments–which
can easily be done in Typepad merely by clicking a checkbox–even though I expected
to receive abusive responses. Unlike some people, I believe in and am
comfortable with public debate.

I suggest that we just agree to disagree. I’m sure we both have better things to do.

P.S. I have not yet succeeded in finding a copy of the previous comments, as they were deleted along with my postings. I checked Google for a cached version and also tried WayBackMachine.org, but to no avail.

Here’s my recollection of some of the most salient comments that were lost:

"This Svend guy is an idiot who’s jealous of Muqtedar and just trying to promote himself."
"Diana Eck of the Pluralism Project gave a talk at my school. She was asked what she thought of Muqtedar and she called him a ‘national treasure’."
"Svend, I have read and enjoyed your blog up to now, but your nasty comments on Muqtedar have just ruined it for me."
"Normally, I don’t comment on such things but this link was forwarded to me by a student. I am appalled by your atttacks on an up and coming scholar. I have reviewed a chapter by him on Imam Shafi’ for an upcoming work and I must say that I think it was b brilliant. You are like a nurse questioning the work of a successful surgeon who has performed many successful surgeries." [Pastes in his long cv.]
"This guy is a nobody who’s trying to make a name for himself by attacking one of our scholars."

This is the best I can do. The point is that a number of readers vehemently protested my comments.

BTW, if anyone can think of another place online where I could find a cached copy of those pages, please let me know and I’ll repost them.

Progressive Muslims

Previous Post

July 23, 2005

The last word on Muqtedar Khan & PMU

Next Post

July 28, 2005 Why Tom Tancredo can stand by bombing Mecca

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Politics Animals in Islam Anti-Semitism Christian Jihadism Christianity Culture & the Arts Current Affairs Denmark Dogs in Islam Family life Film Gender Great MP3s Hate in America Imam W.D. Mohammed Interfaith Dialogue International Affairs Islam and the Left Islamic Thought Islamophobia Jihad Judaism Legos Link of the Day Marriage Misc Modernity/Post-Modernity Mormonism Multiculturalism Music Muslims in the Melting Pot Must-Listen Podcasts Non-Muslims and Islam Pakistan Pictures Pigs in Islam Polygamy Pork Progressive Muslims Race Relations Really Important Stuff Religion Required Reading Robert Spencer Scandinavia Science Science Fiction Sex in Islam So-called Globalization South Asia Star Trek Strange but True Studying Arabic Stupid Muslim Tricks Sufism/Tasawwuf Television The "Miami 7" hoopla The Corporate Media The Danish cartoons The GWOT The Jihad against Islam The Middle East Vikings! Wahhabism/Salafism Washington and the Middle East Web/Tech Women in Islam

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 November 2013 September 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The Thessalonians were told that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE