Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

‘Fake Witch Books’ Timeline – and Commentary

Last updated on: February 18, 2020 at 3:17 pm   by Aine Llewellyn

‘Fake Witch Books’ Timeline – and Commentary 2020-02-18T15:17:33-07:00 Aine Llewellyn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Rough Timeline, Composed of Tweets and Relevant Links

The dates I have listed are based on those found on the Tweets and articles themselves. If a date seems off, please let me know.

If you have written something on this topic that I missed (or comes out after this post originally goes up), please comment or shoot me an email at [email protected]. If you have a Tweet you would like included, feel free to shoot it my way.

December 22, 2019:

Psst… that popular witch book you’re looking at on amazon that’s getting all the acclaim yet was published by a non-Pagan publisher?

At least the first 10 of those reviews were paid reviews.
They’re fake.

— Althaea Sebastiani (@LadyAlthaea) December 22, 2019

Also, check the names they’re picking for these ghost writers:

Lisa Chamberlain
Lisa Buckland
Lisa Crowley
Lisa Cunningham
Amy Lisa Crystal
Harmony Magick
Samantha Lisa
Amy Harmony
Lisa Shadows

It’s *almost* like they’re just capitalizing on search trends. �

— Thorn Mooney (@TarotSkeptic) December 22, 2019

December 26, 2019:

February 7, 2020:

February 8:

Continuing with the conversation about fake people writing witch books: the thing that’s even more cringey and concerning is that, well, a couple of those books are *better* than books written by people with traditional book contracts. So what do we make of that?

— Thorn Mooney (@TarotSkeptic) February 8, 2020

One of my fav trashy fiction series had been releasing a book a month since 1986. Big publishing company. The entire series is pubbed under a house name. No idea how many different writers have -and are- actually writing these books. This isn’t uncommon.

— Althaea Sebastiani (@LadyAlthaea) February 8, 2020

Okay, but. They’re not “fake authors.” These are real people, practicing witches who wrote a book on spec, sold the rights, & it was pubbed under a house name. House names are not a new thing. Publishing companies have used them for longer than many of us have been alive.

— Althaea Sebastiani (@LadyAlthaea) February 8, 2020

February 9:

I think it says more about our community’s ability to discern what they’re reading, and how much we attach to the personality of who we buy from. I have concerns about publishing broadly, but ghostwriting isn’t one, exactly.

— Thorn Mooney (@TarotSkeptic) February 8, 2020

February 10:

Too many folks are totally missing the point of this kerfuffle about ‘fake’ witchy authors. If your takeaway is “only buy books from (big trad publisher)” you are one of those folks.

— Bex (@trebleluna) February 10, 2020

As this tweet and the resulting discussion is getting a lot of attention, here’s a boost so you can read the original tweets and ALL the resulting discussions.

Spoilers: the discussion was *never* about fake authors or calling anyone fake. It was about discernment. https://t.co/PveNslXoAa

— Althaea Sebastiani (@LadyAlthaea) February 10, 2020

February 11:

The point of the original discussion was never to encourage people to *only* buy from mainstream publishers -who use the same/similar tactics as these ghostwritten books to generate sales. https://t.co/EDGns6d8J3

— Althaea Sebastiani (@LadyAlthaea) February 10, 2020

February 12:

February 14:


Some Notes/My Thoughts

One thing I noticed while trying to gather up discussions on the ‘fake witch books’ or ‘fake witch author’ phenomenon was how the conversation shifted over time. Looking at the tweets that started the more visible discussions, the focus was on being critically minded. Thinking about what you were reading and why it was written, who wrote it and how the author was being advertised.

Discernment isn’t just for spirits.

The publishing of the Wild Hunt article on Dec 26 seems to have shifted some of the conversation to ghostwriting and the ‘fake’ quality of the books. This was obviously a much less fruitful discussion.

Nathara’s post on Feb 7 swept through various social media platforms and inflamed the discussion all over again, though this time the focus was much more on ghostwriting and the authors themselves being ‘fake’.

Which wasn’t what the original discussion was about. Looking at Nathara’s second post, with its heavy focus on PLR and problems with Amazon, we see a discussion that is certainly related to the one from December, but it’s got a different focus. (PLR stands for ‘Private Label Rights’. As described by this link: “…when one buys PLR content, they are free to take the work, modify it, put their name on it and even sell it, for example, as an ebook.“) And we see the really unfortunate and wrong assumption that we should just stick to traditional publishing houses coming out in response to this post. (From what I read, I don’t think Nathara said such a thing.)

That’s not a solution to either problem of discernment or the Amazon marketplace.

Photo by Michael Jin on Unsplash

As I see it, the PLR issue, while related to ghostwriting, is different. We should try to untangle the two a bit more, I think.

When it comes to the PLR and the deluge of questionable books (Ars Technica goes into the Amazon spam problem…in an article from 2011, for reference on how long this has been a problem), I view the problem as similar to one that impacted Steam, a video game distributing service. Steam was, and is, plagued by a lot of bad, regurgitated games. If you want a fun overview of what was happening on Steam, check out this video by game critic Jim Sterling. (Warnings for cursing.) These games were made by piecing together assets bought on the cheap, and they weren’t meant to be enjoyed. They were meant to make money as quick as possible with as little effort as possible. And they choked out a lot of actual indie games.

Same thing is happening on Amazon – though Amazon has actually been dealing with this for longer than Steam has.

I think it absolutely makes sense to be frustrated that actual books – whether ghostwritten or not – are being overwhelmed by PLR. As the Plagiarism Today article I linked to notes:

In my experience, the people who do best with PLR content are, unfortunately, spammers. With scraping and other copyright infringement becoming riskier, most find it cheaper and easier to shell out a small amount of money on PLR content that they can then run through content spinners and then generate thousands of low-quality articles from the set that are at least somewhat unique to the search engines.

When it comes to the many complex and weird ways books are advertised and make it to bestseller lists, well, that’s a much larger topic concerning the whole publishing industry. Not to mention the high profile ‘NYT bestseller scandal’ that happened a few years ago (if you’re interested in reading about that, check this link at Jezebel).

So that’s my hot take. I’ll keep updating this post with new information as it becomes available.

Uncategorized

books

community

reading

Previous Post



February 7, 2020

Pop Culture and Paganism

Next Post



February 19, 2020 Review of Rituals & Declarations (Issue 1)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Peter raised Tabitha (Dorcas) from the dead in Lydda.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

Pagan

Definitions, Labels, and Utility

Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

Pagan

The Best Offerings

Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

Pagan

Pagan Proselytizing Is Still Bad

Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

Pagan

Journaling in the Plague

Aine Llewellyn - Dalliances with Deities

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Pagan

What do the Gods Look Like?

I was recently chatting with someone on Instagram. She asked me what...

My Blogging Style

While there are many people who share their results, the end of...

The Odyssey

On July 23, I saw Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey which is Homer’s...

Work in progress

As I write this two big events have just finished up. One...

Restoring the Watershed of Divine Love

Perhaps cooperation is not something we manufacture through legislation, ideology, or moral...

Pray Like A UU

Many UUs don’t pray because of bad experiences in a previous religion,...

view all Pagan blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube