Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

On Being Outside All the Boxes

Last updated on: February 26, 2013 at 11:09 am   by Aidan Kelly

On Being Outside All the Boxes 2013-02-26T11:09:55-08:00 Aidan Kelly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Having been working (for a long time) on a novel about the same alternative universe as in my Goddess Murder, I have been looking for books on Mary Magdalene, the Gnostics, and suchlike. Recently I found Secrets of Mary Magdalene. Don’t be put off by the title. It is a well-balanced anthology of interviews with and essays by the leading scholars, largely women, of Gnosticism, early Christianity, and related fields, and by women novelists, not the hack writers whose forgettable novels clutter library shelves, but ones who, like myself, regard the novel as simulation modeling of possible realities. The essay by one of the latter, Ki Longfellow—whose novel, The Secret Magdalene, I must find—awakened me to an equation that I feel rather dense not to have arrived at it before, but, as often, perhaps there is a reason why I was not supposed to have known it yet.

In an early blog on this channel entitled “The End of My Catholic Boyhood,” I described the experience at age 14 that freed me from having to believe in the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church and set me on a path, which I am still on, of investigating all matters religious for myself. The catalyst for the experience was reading an official nihil obstat; imprimatur pamphlet which said that Catholics do not believe in the church’s doctrines by blind faith; instead, all those teachings are proved to them (a primary goal of Thomas Aquinas). But since I had mastered geometry, the quintessential system of logic, I knew nothing had been proved to me—but before I could consciously deduce the logical conclusion, my consciousness went KA-WHOOM!!!

I described details of that experience in that earlier blog; I plan to expand on all that later. Here I am thinking about why it happened and what it meant. Why it happened? Because I am a clinically depressive sort. That evening I was deep in a trough of my cyclic depressions,  probably far closer to being suicidal than I was aware of. (Parents, watch your teenagers carefully. Suicide is the leading cause of death for them.) The experience happened in order to save my life. We are given such an experience only because we need it, never because we merely want it. A corollary is the fact that one can work magic or use psychic talents “only in need, never for show.” Gerald Gardner knew what he was talking about when he wrote that.

Now, what it meant. I recognized from Ki’s description of her own experience that it was the same sort as mine—but she called it gnosis and said it was the key experience of the Gnostics, that what they knew was the transformation of that experience. “Of course!” I thought. “Why didn’t I ever see that before?” My issue at 14 was that, since nothing had been proved, I actually knew nothing—but in that moment I was given more than proof. I was given direct experience of what I knew was a compassionate divinity (or, more precisely, as I have since figured out, an interface that an infinite divinity must use in order to communicate with a finite being, although in that moment I also knew that I was simultaneously part of and separate from that divinity). Afterward, belief was unnecessary; I knew and know what I felt, which was nothing at all like what I might have expected from my catechism classes.

William James established in The Varieties of Religious Experience that such experiences are not actually rare, although they can vary greatly in their intensity, details, and effects on people’s future behavior. I don’t know what percentage of the population may have had such an experience. Those who have had them generally don’t know what to make of them and certainly do not talk about them except with the very few people who are closest to them. Chances are that every day you encounter such a person and never know it. That is the point of the beautiful Jewish tradition of the Lamed-vov Tzaddikim, of the thirty-six [thank you, Deborah] righteous persons for whose sake God refrains from destroying all creation and who never know that’s who they are. It has also been said that true saints never think they are saints.

However, please believe that the Divine will never destroy any life unnecessarily, let alone the universe. Such a concept of a rageaholic uncompassionate tyrant, of Blake’s old Nobodaddy, is merely a bad dream, or a tale told to small children to keep them safe until they are old enough to understand the adult version of their family’s faith. As Jewish tradition also says, to take a human life is to destroy the entire universe. Evil consists entirely of a human willingness to harm any living being unnecessarily. An even greater illness or insanity is to enjoy inflicting such harm. No true divinity is capable of being evil, nor is any person who has been Awakened by the experience I have been talking about.

I try to avoid using the word “God,” because most people cannot help assuming that word always means the childish concept of a God who punishes sins. For that matter, I need a shorter name for “the sort of experience I have been talking about.” Calling it “mystic” or “enlightenment” or “conversion” or several other possibilities is inadequate, but really, no term can be adequate; whatever term is used, a person who has not had such an experience cannot know what the term is referring to. So I’ll use the term “Awakening,” the term used in the “Gnostic” writings, because it is neutral and allows some useful metaphors, analogies, and parts of speech, such as “an Awakened person.”

The key fact in my life is that I was simply handed salvation, free, gratis, no strings attached, because it cannot be earned or deserved; it is always a gift. After the experience, I knew I was safe and always will be. Others have other definitions, but I see salvation as consisting entirely in the realization that there is nothing one needs to be saved from. As Paul, my first really good AA sponsor, said to me, “The only thing wrong with you is that when you were very young, you bought into the idea that there was something wrong with you. Once you get over that, you’ll be fine.”

Knowing I am safe does not, however, protect me from the consequences of my own folly or the vicissitudes of life. I have survived many difficulties, illnesses, and mistakes. The existence of the Awakened state is maddening to the unawakened. One sees that clearly in the writings of the great heresiologists, who managed to preserve much important information about the “heretics” they were denouncing. These days, the once-born psychologists try to argue that Awakening must be a symptom of mental illness. No, it is not. Rather, it is the onset of true mental health. I have been suicidally depressed many times; that is a physical illness; my Awakening continues to prevent me from believing such thoughts. I have had many manic episodes, to the point that I felt as if I were possessed by an evil spirit. I have also aspected half a dozen different deities in circle; I know the difference. I tried lots of different psychedelics back in the 1960s. The idea that LSD produces a genuine Awakening is ludicrous. I know that Awakening is not like any of these.

There is much more I will be discussing in coming days, about the Awakenings of Rabbi Yeshua ha-Notsri, of Joseph Smith, Jr., and of others as I come to them. I will explain what I can deduce about their teachings and those of other Awakened people. But for now I will, finally, explain about those boxes.

If I remember to pay attention, I become aware of the presence of the Divine at any time, in any place. I have felt that presence in a Catholic mass, in a Wiccan circle, in a synagogue, in a Mormon Sacrament meeting, at an AA meeting, in a Hindu temple (I haven’t been in a mosque yet). I am in those places not as a visitor, but as a participant, a member. I can also feel the Divine on a city street or out in the wilderness—but it’s easier in places consecrated by human devotion. Less comfortably, I can also feel evil, as in the entire state of Nevada, or outside the flophouse that was down the street from our last apartment in New Orleans.

Of course, I am told all the time, “You can’t believe in all of those at the same time! You can’t belong to them all! You have to choose just one!”  Such a choice must be made by the unawakened, I guess, and I feel sorry for anyone who labors under such a limitation. But I can do all that, because I am a Gnostic. I do not need to believe; I know, and every religion, every possible religion, is merely a special case of what I know. My life has been driven by the need to explore and explain and manifest the implications of my Awakening.

You cannot enclose the Divine in a box. You cannot force the Divine to obey your rules. That’s one point made by the parable of the Prodigal Son, a point the established churches always manage to ignore. And you cannot enclose me in a box. What’s more, you have an absolute right not to be enclosed in a box either—and that is the most important statement in this essay.

More will be revealed.

Gnostics

Awakwning

Catholicism

conversion

enlightenment

Jesus

Judaism

Mary Magdalene

mysticism

Rabbi Joshua

Theology

Previous Post



February 20, 2013

"History" -- Part III

Next Post



February 28, 2013 A Dialogue of Angels


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Gnostics Pagan Paganism Poetry Social Justice Theology Uncategorized Witches

Select a Month August 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 September 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 September 2014 August 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal spoke to Balaam?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A donkey A dove A lion A lamb

Related posts from Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

Pagan

Our Experiment in Religious Engineering

Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

Pagan

The Way of Ecstasy

Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

Pagan

The Word Creates the Thing It Names

Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

Pagan

The Allegory of the Diamond

Aidan Kelly: Including Paganism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Pagan

What do the Gods Look Like?

I was recently chatting with someone on Instagram. She asked me what...

My Blogging Style

While there are many people who share their results, the end of...

The Odyssey

On July 23, I saw Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey which is Homer’s...

Work in progress

As I write this two big events have just finished up. One...

Restoring the Watershed of Divine Love

Perhaps cooperation is not something we manufacture through legislation, ideology, or moral...

Pray Like A UU

Many UUs don’t pray because of bad experiences in a previous religion,...

view all Pagan blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube