Born-Again Witch: The Pope, Pagans, and Evangelical Environmentalists

Last updated on: June 22, 2015 at 5:12 pm by Annika Mongan

Born-Again Witch: The Pope, Pagans, and Evangelical Environmentalists 2015-06-22T17:12:51+00:00 Annika Mongan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Although no view of eschatology can negate the theocentric outlook of the Bible as evidenced by man’s place in creation, God’s ownership of and care for creation, the problem remains how the latter can be reconciled with an eschatological view of apocalyptic destruction. The title of this paper “Why Care If It’s All Going To Burn Anyways?” is characteristic of the apathy many evangelicals have towards environmental issues.

Tyssul Patel / unsplash.com

First of all it is necessary to establish that not all eschatological systems hold to an apocalyptic destruction in the eschaton. Post-millennialism, for example, believes that by God’s work through the church the world will become a better place and the golden age of the millennium will take place on this earth. As Calvin DeWitt has argued in Nature Reborn, all forms of social action by the church are strongly encouraged by this eschatology, environmentalism notwithstanding (6). Although advocated throughout most of church history, in 20th and 21st century post-millennialism is not widely adhered to; pre-millennialism has taken its place as the most popular system of eschatology among American Evangelicals.

Premillennial eschatology is frequently characterized by a very pessimistic view of the future, including an apocalyptic annihilation of the earth. This view was recently made popular and has come to be understood by many as the Christian view of eschatology through the tremendously successful Left Behind novels by Jerry Jenkins and Tim LaHaye. Dispensationalism, the eschatological system underlying the series, views the hope of Christians as a secret rapture, in which the faithful are taken out of this world. The world then becomes worse and worse, anti-Christ arises, God brings destruction upon the earth until finally Christ returns to earth, destroys his enemies, gathers those who became Christians since the rapture and creates a brand new earth on which he establishes the millennial kingdom.

Tom Sine writes in Sojourners Magazine that “LaHaye’s writings tend to foster both an eschatology of disengagement and the politics of fear” (www.sojo.net). It takes little imagination to see why Al Truesdale sees the escapist view advocated by the Left Behind series as “an eschatology that makes it religiously unnecessary and logically impossible to engage in the long-range commitments to the environment required by a truly serious attitude of ecological stewardship” (116). The believer’s hope is not realized within this world but through an escape from the earth.

Calvin DeWitt shows that escapist eschatology is not a recent phenomenon: “Under the continuing influence of the Gnosticism that infected the early church, some have reduced God to the one who saves us out of creation” (Caring 40). He laments that “it is in fact a temptation to consider giving up on creation altogether, and many have done so” (Caring 37). It is this attitude of “why care, if it’s all going to burn anyway” that has led many believers to justify neglect of the environment. After all, Christians have been given the great commission to preach the gospel to all nations, hence “too much attention to environmental stewardship…trivializes our calling”, as Revered Scott Gilchrist of Southwest Bible Church in Beaverton, Oregon puts it (Cole).

Although escapist eschatology is widespread in the theology of premillennialism, not all who take a premillennial view of eschatology have such a pessimistic outlook. Whereas classical dispensationalism, the eschatological system of Left Behind, placed the kingdom of God entirely in the future after an apocalyptic destruction of the earth, a more progressive form of dispensationalism came to replace the classical view, largely due to the writings of George Eldon Ladd. While holding to premillennialism, Ladd rejected the idea that the kingdom was a future reality only. Instead he argued for the “now and not yet”, “here and not here” of the kingdom. Although it would only be fully realized in the future millennial reign of Christ, the kingdom had been inaugurated by the first coming of Christ. The church was to live by kingdom ethics now and so draw the future reality of the kingdom into the present.

Van Leeuwen shows how this view impacts the Christian’s attitude towards the environment: “The final renewal of all things has begun already in this age, in Christ and those who are his new creation. But this new creation is by no means merely a human phenomenon that leaves creation as a whole behind. God’s re-creation of the world is not yet complete, but in Christ and his body, the church, it has begun” (68, emphasis his). The church now is striving to reflect the values that will be fully expressed in the future kingdom. As stated earlier, the root of the environmental crisis lies in human sinfulness. Through his redemptive work, Christ has begun to repair the effects of sin. Renewal has begun in the church, believers whose sins are forgiven have been empowered by God to bring restoration where sin has caused destruction. The church’s mandate for healing and redemption is far from being limited to the believers’ relationship with God and with one another. Even as now all creation waits for the church’s ultimate eschatological redemption (Rom 8), so now the church must express the inaugurated process of redemption to this world in anticipation of the future. Van Leeuwen summarizes:

“Insofar as sin has caused a brokenness in humanity’s relationships with nature, and insofar as the restoration of all nonhuman creation is included in the coming kingdom, it necessarily follows that righteousness includes a restored relationship with creation. Kingdom righteousness necessarily implies eco-justice. The ethic of peacemaking, shalom-building, and nonviolence must be extended to embrace the relationship with creation” (88).

This paradigm of the “now and not-yet” of the kingdom of God demands of the church to bring redemption to the earth now, regardless of what will happen to creation at Christ’s return. The principle of caring for things that do not last forever and are destined for decay is seen in the human body (Lucas 96). Since the fall the human body has been flawed and will progressively deteriorate throughout the lifetime of a human until death and on to decay. Yet despite the temporal nature of the human body, and despite the process of decay that begins even while the person is still alive, we care for our bodies, restore and nurture them. Contrary to stoic thought the Christian does not treat his/her body as merely an evil host in which the soul is doomed to reside until its deliverance from matter. In the biblical worldview the body is part of a creation God called good, and although fallen and temporal, it needs to be cared for as a part of God’s good creation.

Likewise, even if we hold to a view in which the earth will ultimately be destroyed, this does not negate our responsibility to care for the earth. God has called creation good and has appointed us as stewards over the earth, not as strangers in an evil environment from which he will rescue us. The temporality of the earth does not imply a devaluing of its innate qualities as God’s creation. It needs to be pointed out that the eschatological destruction envisioned by many premillennialists is due to God’s acts of judgment upon the earth because of man’s sinfulness. Like in Noah’s flood, the earth will once again suffer destruction because of God’s judging mankind. This kind of destruction is entirely different from our present ecological crisis. Whereas the eschatological destruction is a sovereign act of God’s justice, the earth’s present demise is due to human neglect and sin. Simply because God will bring destruction in his righteousness does not give us the right to destroy the earth now by our unrighteous neglect and exploitation. Just as we now care for human beings who will ultimately be destroyed in God’s judgment, we must care for the earth.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

June 20, 2015

The Rantin' Raven: Songs for the Old Religion, in Context

Next Post

June 23, 2015 The Busy Witch: Reviewing Jane Eyre's Sisters by Jody Gentian Bower

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Lakeside Hearth Adventures in Wortcunning Alone In Her Presence Arts, Crafts & Cooking Birthing Hereditary Witchcraft Book of Blackbirds Book Reviews Born-Again Witch Cauldron, Sword, Spear, & Stone Cermony and Liturgy Columns Community Dandelion Seeds Dear Jasmine Druid Thoughts Editor's Picks Everyday Pagan Family & Household Practice Family Traditions Full Frontal Magic Gateway Goddess Guest Articles Happily Heathen Health and Wellness Hearth of Hellenism Heathen Woman Hills of the Horizon History Holidays Horse Goddesses Interfaith Interviews Irish-American Witchcraft Jewish Witch Lamp & Labyrinth Letters from Midgard Literature, Media, Film, Music Loop of Brighid Love, Sex & Relationships Magic or Magick Making Light Naturalistic Traditions Nature News Outside The Circle Pantheisticon Politics Prayers, Poems, Blessings & Stories Queer Femme Mystic Queer of Swords Recipes Ritual and Practice Science and Research Seekers and Guides Seeking the Grail Socially Responsible Magic Spear of Athena Star Made Witch Syncretic Electric Technology The Blooming Staff The Busy Witch The Cartomancer The Crow's Nest The Dance of Pagan Recovery The Hearth of Hellenism The Lady's Quill The Other Side of the Hedge The Path of She The Rantin' Raven The Witches Next Door The Zen Pagan Theology, Ethics, Philosophy Tree City Witch Urban Earthwitch Wayfaring Woman Witch on Fire Wyrd Words

Select a Month January 2026 March 2025 December 2024 June 2024 April 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 August 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which continent is experiencing the fastest growth in Christianity?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Africa Europe Asia Oceania