Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Aestheism

Mormons Stormin’ the Inauguration

Last updated on: January 13, 2017 at 12:53 pm   by David Mason

Mormons Stormin’ the Inauguration 2017-01-13T12:53:28-05:00 David Mason

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Praise to the Man

Praise to the Man

The LDS church will send its famed Mormon Tabernacle Choir to perform in the inauguration of a new president, next month. Many Mormons are aghast. Bad enough, they say, that so many LDS-Mormons threw their integrity in the fireplace and voted for this career criminal. Now the LDS church itself wants to contribute, actively, to valorizing him?

Those for whom apologia is a way of life will scream, I expect, that participation in the inauguration of a POTUS is a privilege having nothing to do with the particular person being inaugurated, and that turning down the invitation would be tantamount to sedition. Meh. Overlooking the monstrous evil that this particular person practices, as a matter of course, has been this particular country’s great disgrace all along. Letting this particular person slide, over and over again, has been our collective sedition.

Anyway—for the apologists—I’m actually delighted that the Mo-Tab will sing #LittlePrincePumpkin into the White House. I’ve been worrying that I might not last much longer as a card-carrying LDS-Mormon. Now I have greatly renewed confidence.

Being an LDS-Mormon person used to be hard. Never mind the stuff like not having unauthorized sex and not stealing. I mean, given some circumstances, that stuff is certainly difficult. But the relatively simple matter of being nice takes effort. Loving one’s neighbor ain’t easy. Working in the manner of Jesus to make everyone feel loved, valued, worthwhile—when you’re as dysfunctional as I am, that’s exhausting.

The LDS church’s decision to send its face and voice to celebrate the inauguration of one of the twenty-first century’s most hateful people has lifted that great, Jesus-y burden. Obviously, the choir’s event won’t make it easier to be a good person. It merely confirms, with finality, that being good is not really an LDS thing.

So much easier, now. As long as my principal interest is staying in the LDS church, I don’t even have to try for the simple things, anymore.

It might even be better that I actively try not to be good. In a culture that so clearly values hate-mongering, misogyny, and almost indiscriminate hatred, the attempt to practice niceness could pose a threat to the authority that sustains hate-mongering and misogyny as a sign of faithfulness.

But this is the great liberation that rises from the LDS church’s shameless prostration to evil. The LDS church and all its authority have ceded the moral high ground for good, which means that no one needs to take church authority seriously.

I can’t wait for the next pompous LDS windbag to tell me that I’m an apostate. “Follow the prophet!” they bellow at me. “Stay in the straight and narrow! Hold to the iron rod! You’re headed toward that great and spacious building with all your faithless arguing.”

Pfft.

The LDS church is going to dance with a sexual predator on the most public stage imaginable. Indeed, the church seems eager to let everyone know that its cultural ambassadors will share the cold, January dais with this gleefully hate-mongering sex offender.

The camera will pan, slowly, on inauguration day, across the strong, choir faces of LDS women, earnestly forming their O’s in the freezing wind—so reverent, so solemnly faithful and patriotic. Then, a crossfade, holding in one frame for a moment the pure sanctity of Mormon womanhood behind the grinning profile of a monster who, but for the cameras, would grab their pussies without hesitating.

“I’m guilty of arguing?” I’ll say. “The Mormon Tabernacle Choir sang paeans to the Pussy-Grabber-In-Chief.”

Check and mate.

I’m made, Brethren and Sistren. It had been merely that all the callow LDS-Mormon individuals who voted for the Great Orange Gargoyle had surrendered their right to speak on matters of right and wrong.  Now, the church itself has stepped down from its place of higher virtue and probity. My own judgment turns out to be much more solidly moral, as I’d so long suspected.  It’s like getting an extra birthday this year.

I’ve even got a hymn for the choir to sing. Turn with me, now—won’t you?—to hymn number twenty-three in the authorized LDS hymnal. I expect you’ll agree with me that the following hymn is perfect for the Mo-Tab voices that will usher in The Next Four Years for us all.

We loudly sing for thee,
Our reprobate,
Praising thy lechery, Misogynist Ape;
We sing our fealty this ‘naugural,
May your degen’racy cheapen us all,
May your degen’racy debase us all.

We proudly sing for thee,
Thou demagogue,
Lauding thy bigotry, hatred and fraud;
Grant us thy racist turn this ‘naugural,
Make white supremacy rule over all,
Make white supremacy terrorize all.

We gladly sing for thee,
Liar Supreme,
Yearning to join with thee, whate’er thy scheme;
Let’s fleece the vuln’rable this ‘naugural,
Steal, rob, and bilk the blind—defraud them all,
Steal, rob, and bilk the blind—bamboozle all.

We warmly sing for thee,
Man-Baby dear.
We’re well-acclimatized to th’ rule of fear;
Bully the principled, that’s nothing new.
For the past century, we’ve done it, too,
For more than a century, we’ve oppressed, too.

Update: Mo-Tab member resigns from the choir over its decision to perform for the #LittlePrincePumpkin inauguration. Rock on, Jan Chamberlin.

Further Update: Raul Reyes at CNN: “It sends the wrong message to the church’s members around the world that the choir would perform for a leader so at odds with LDS teachings — and let’s not even get into Trump’s bragging about sexual assault.” You and me both, Mr. Reyes.

Still Another Update: There’s a growing catalog of folks who might very well regard the inauguration of a U.S. president as a celebratory event that transcends party politics, but who regard this particular person as so personally despicable they can’t share a stage with him—not for fame, not for money. Would that the Mo-Tab had as much determination to avoid the very appearance of evil as KISS.

And another update: History from Joseph Stuart, and this little bit of every-bit-right analysis: “‘America’s Choir’ and the LDS Church may separate the music from the candidate, but public perception will not. It is likely that the Tabernacle Choir’s performance will link Mormonism to the Trump administration, not only in votes, but also in the hearts and minds of those that watch them sing.”

—————-

Image adapted from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mormon_Tabernacle_Choir.jpg

Activism

LDS Church

#LittlePrincePumpkin

Mormon Tabernacle Choir

Previous Post



December 12, 2016

Generation Snowflake

Next Post



December 31, 2016 2017 Is the Future


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Aesthetics Art Atheism Bible Book of Mormon Christianity Freedom Games Guest Posts Hinduism Identity LDS Church Marriage Prayer Ritual Science Theatre Theism Toxic Theology

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why was it scandalous for the woman to anoint Jesus' feet with tears?

Select your answer to see how you score.

She was wealthy She was foreign She was a known sinner She was a child

Related posts from Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Racism Is Not About Feeling

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

This is the GOP's Bloody Legacy

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

The Moral Bankruptcy of the Boy Scouts

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Toxic Theology: Learning Doesn't Matter

Aestheism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube