Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Aestheism

Peter Brook and Coldplay’s Orientalist Weekend

Last updated on: February 10, 2016 at 10:02 am   by David Mason

Peter Brook and Coldplay’s Orientalist Weekend 2016-02-10T10:02:43-05:00 David Mason

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

a version of india

A Version of India

First, let me say that even while I concede that I know next to nothing about today’s popular music, I nevertheless genuinely, honestly, sincerely think “Coldplay” is a perfectly lousy name for a band.

Second, let me affirm with vigor that I have nothing against Her Fantabulance, Beyoncé.

Third, let me admit that, because I do not live in London, I have not seen Peter Brook’s new Mahabharata play Battlefield; however, I did see Brook’s former Mahabharata play at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in 1987.  All ten hours.  In one day.

Fourth, let me concede that, given how I have appropriated India for my own gain, what follows is most certainly self-incriminating.

There is a very long and unbroken tradition of individuals of European and North American extraction exploiting people and material of South and East Asia (not to mention of Africa, of Oceania, and of the rest of the planet).  Europe’s great humanist awakening gave way to global colonialism, and the next thing we knew, Goethe was fashioning a dramatic prologue to Faust under the influence of classical Sanskrit drama.  Criminally, and also with all the best of multi-cultural intentions, the Orientalist project that drove European culture for three centuries or more shaped an intellectual and artistic world in which Asia would dance and Europe would speak.

The arguments over cultural appropriation have been charring the hallways of academia for some time.  I’m rather happy to see the consciousness of Orientalism infecting popular discourse, as well.  The webosphere’s twogs and bleets rather glowed with indignation at the release of Coldplay’s “Hymn for the Weekend” video.  Meanwhile, I have been scratching my head about the artistes who are swooning on Facebook over Peter Brook’s Battlefield.

It feels to me like pop culture is flexing critical faculties, calling its own to account, while elite culture is giving Brook a pass.

Coldplay’s video wrings from India all the cliches that Orientalism has tuned the West to expect: levitating sadhus, shikharas, so much orange, a bit of kathakali, and, of course, every day is Holi in India. The problem is not that such things are not really to be found in India.  Stand on the steps of Dasasvamedh Ghat in Varanasi at 6am and Coldplay’s representation of exotic India will seem positively sterile.  The problem is that the video so selects its images of India that India looks lovely, but looks silent.

Orientalism’s principal sin is that Western endeavors—artistic, intellectual, cultural, economic—mute the rest of the world, so that it seems that educated people of Europe, of the United States, are naturally authorized to speak, since no one else seems able to speak so clearly or competently.  Pop culture’s reiteration of the sin—from the Beatles’ invention of the sitar to Paul Simon’s discovery of mbube to Madonna’s truck with Kabbala to Dr. Dre’s sampling of Lata Mangeshkar—affirm that some privileged few are most capable of speaking to the world for the others.

The challenge that the internet raised to Coldplay’s amble through India suggests that pop culture has grown skeptical of the old Orientalist mode.  A hopeful note for the future.

Meanwhile, Peter Brook has gone back to The Mahabharata, and nary a word but giddy praise has, so far, emerged from the academy.

In the nineteen-eighties, Peter Brook fashioned a giant theatre event, derived from The Mahabharata, a giant epic poem composed in the pre-CE millennium.  The play was much praised and much criticized by different parties.  Simplified, Brook’s principal sin was titling his production The Mahabharata, as though the production was, indeed, staging the ginormous epic, entirely and objectively; whereas, even in ten hours, the show could hardly offer a smidgeon.  That smidgeon, said some critics, showed more Brook than Bharat, to the end that India was, again, brought out to look pretty, but not to speak.

Brook’s Battlefield attacks the epic, again, although, this time, the production appears much less ambitious than its predecessor.  Rather than the “history of mankind”, this production stages only the aftermath of the epic’s cataclysmic war, in what looks like Brook’s signature style of lush, saturated simplicity.

Perhaps this production lets India make some articulate noise, but I’m doubtful.  As did Coldplay, I suspect that Brook again stands on India so as to be more clearly heard by the crowd.  The curious new development, however, is that—with respect to Coldplay—the rising, inter-globed generation seems naturally keyed to respond critically and skeptically to the reiteration of Orientalist tropes.

No doubt, the Interweb’s capacity to amplify voices from the least-regarded corners of the planet can be cited for the young West’s growing inclination to hear others over the din of its enlightenment.

———————-

image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yulelog1889.jpg

Art

Theatre

India

orientalism

Previous Post



February 1, 2016

Not the 'Why' but the 'What' of the Western Wall

Next Post



February 12, 2016 Notes on Vaginas


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Aesthetics Art Atheism Bible Book of Mormon Christianity Freedom Games Guest Posts Hinduism Identity LDS Church Marriage Prayer Ritual Science Theatre Theism Toxic Theology

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "seek first the kingdom of God" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ignore God Seek revenge Worry about clothing Put God first

Related posts from Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Real Religion Doesn't Know

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Religion's Placebo Effect(s)

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

The Conference Enigma: a little play

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Mormon, the Musical

Aestheism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube