Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Aestheism

How Did Ruth Get Past the Guards?

Last updated on: January 22, 2016 at 3:15 pm   by David Mason

How Did Ruth Get Past the Guards? 2016-01-22T15:15:34-05:00 David Mason

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ruth

Julius Schnorr’s Ruth

By all that is holy, Ruth should never have left Moab.  I know, I know: your god is my god, and all that.  But believing is no excuse for being a Moabite.  According to revealed policy, no matter what commitment she might have made to Naomi and to god, Ruth and her offspring ought to have been summarily and permanently excluded from hanging out with god’s people.

Deuteronomy’s revealed policy on the matter does not equivocate:

“An Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever.”

Someone in olden days messed up, because Ruth—a Moabite, as far as we know from the divine record that we have—did enter into the congregation of the Lord, and there was no exclusion of her first generation, let alone all her generations to the tenth.

Those of us faithful, then, face some conundrum.  How did Ruth—persona non grata—not only get into the congregation in direct contravention of revealed policy, not only become, personally, an icon of the congregation from which revealed policy excluded her, but make her immediate descendants, whom revealed policy ought to have excluded, as well, the congregation’s sanctified leaders?

Ruth is a real head-scratcher for us faithful folks.  Strict obedience, and all that.

Perhaps Ruth’s ecclesiastical leaders did not know the policy.  It certainly wouldn’t strain credulity to imagine a small selection of marginally-educated priests who were so encumbered by administrative and professional responsibilities that they were simply not acquainted with this one part of the voluminous policies that had been given to them to enforce.  So, perhaps, Ruth slipped into the congregation of the Lord through a few leaders’ ignorance of the fact that they were supposed to keep people like her out.

Or, perhaps, the roulette-wheel let Ruth land on some ‘progressive’ or ‘liberal’ judge.  Some few judges were probably faithless enough to set aside some small parts of revealed policy with which they disagreed, vainly thinking they were serving the greater good by being kind.  Maybe Ruth just happened to find herself across the desk from one of these eye-winking authorities.  It happens.

Maybe she lied.  When the interviewer asked her: do you affiliate with any Moabites, whose identities are contrary to or opposed to those accepted by the congregation of the Lord—maybe she just said, No.  Or, maybe she made an arrangement with the interviewer, by which she admitted to being a Moabite, but promised not to act like one.

Maybe it was all on Boaz’s shoulders.  Ruth was female, after all, so it’s not like she would have had a real identity of her own, Moabite or otherwise.  It might have been that the exclusion of Ruth which the revealed policy called for was Boaz’s responsibility, and everyone simply trusted that he was abiding by revealed policy, same as they.  But the text makes it sound like Ruth’s Moabite identity was pretty well-known.

In any case, Boaz managed to secure Ruth for himself by making sure that her rightful suitor knew she was a Moabite.  Now, that guy knew revealed policy.  As soon as Ruth’s cousin found out that she was a Moabite, he backed away without a second thought.  Not gonna find me bringing a Moabite into the congregation of the Lord, that guy seems to have said.  I’m going to follow the prophet.  However it happened that Ruth got in, she wouldn’t have if we’d only had a few more of those upstanding guys whom the narrative doesn’t bother to give names to.

There’s a Talmudic resolution, of course.  The revealed policy may only have meant to exclude Moabite men.  Yeah, okay.  But if we start being Talmudic, here, where will it end?  We’ll have to start studying revealed policy and all the commentaries and we’ll have to start reasoning through all sorts of things far beyond this one problem of Ruth sneaking into the congregation and we’ll have to make revealed policy a matter of careful, cumulative thinking.  Let’s not let Ruth off the hook for that can of worms.  Instead, let’s keep to the trunk.  The policy says what it says: Ammonite/Moabite, nada.

We could, I suppose, just say: that whole story is in the old testament.  I’m not sure how this solves the problem, but it can let us pretend that the problem doesn’t teach us something.

In the end, I don’t know how she did it.  Somehow, Ruth, who was expressly forbidden by revealed policy to join the congregation, and whose offspring were also expressly forbidden from joining the congregation, got in.  Somehow, David—who was well within those ten generations whom the congregation was to exclude—became King of Israel.  If you believe the genealogies, Jesus himself had Ruth’s Moabite blood in him.

I guess Ruth is just one of those things you have to put up on a shelf and try not to look at too often.

Identity

ethnicity

excommunication

Jesus

Previous Post



January 11, 2016

Guest Post: The Tyranny of Rule(s)

Next Post



February 1, 2016 Not the 'Why' but the 'What' of the Western Wall


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Aesthetics Art Atheism Bible Book of Mormon Christianity Freedom Games Guest Posts Hinduism Identity LDS Church Marriage Prayer Ritual Science Theatre Theism Toxic Theology

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who refused to defile himself with the king's food and wine?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Ezekiel Obadiah Daniel

Related posts from Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Racism Is Not About Feeling

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

Forgiveness Is Not Nice

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

What Will We Lose to Win?

Aestheism

Latter-day Saint

2017 Is the Future

Aestheism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube