Brigham Young, the Interview

Last updated on: February 3, 2015 at 6:04 pm by David Mason

Brigham Young, the Interview 2015-02-03T18:04:31-05:00 David Mason

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Brigham Young: Sovereign in America

Perhaps it’s an example of historical over-reach. But I’m reasonably comfortable suggesting that the LDS church in its current form—in its current character—is much more the product of Brigham Young’s practical determination than of Joseph Smith’s earnest vision. At least, a good case can be made that the way that LDS Mormons are more concerned with moving refrigerators than they are with theological proofs of god’s existence is the consequence of Brigham’s socialist pragmatism rather than of Smith’s religious imagination. Certainly, the way in which LDS people are encouraged to think of the “President of the Church” as the pinnacle of an upwardly-narrowing hierarchy is the consequence of how Brigham shaped and then inhabited this office.

Where Smith’s organization was always in some disarray as a consequence of his inclination to spread authority out horizontally, Brigham, rather brutishly, in fact, shaped the institution vertically. One finds a stark picture of Brigham the Bully in Gary J. Bergera’s Conflict in the Quorum. In Iowa in 1847, Brigham elbows his way into this supreme position, to operate, as he said, “untrammelled”. Pushing two centuries later, the LDS church seems as committed as ever to sustaining a cult of personality around whichever person happens to occupy the chair that Brigham built.

It’s possible—genuinely possible—that there would be no LDS church if not for Brigham’s beastliness. Hard to say, since anything but what actually did happen can only be speculation, and what did happen was that Brigham refused to assimilate into the American mainstream, refused to capitulate to storms and disease, refused to compromise with his own people, and refused to acknowledge anyone else. Brigham refused to let anything be but what he wanted, and what he wanted was a peculiar people, planted solidly in the mountains of the American west, under his authority, and in spite of any objection. The consequence of his stubborn determination was that nothing—not famine, armies, or democracy—could kill off his LDS followers.

What might have been otherwise? Hard to say.

Stephen Usery of Book Talk and I talked over Brigham and his legacy, recently. You can listen to the interview here.

Previous Post

January 16, 2015

Religious Freedom, Out and In

Next Post

February 13, 2015 Of Oedipus and Excommunication

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Aesthetics Art Atheism Bible Book of Mormon Christianity Freedom Games Guest Posts Hinduism Identity LDS Church Marriage Prayer Ritual Science Theatre Theism Toxic Theology

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: According to Hebrews, faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE