Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
INTERVIEW – Al Mohler, Part Five

INTERVIEW – Al Mohler, Part Five

Last updated on: November 6, 2006 at 3:00 am by Adrian Warnock

INTERVIEW – Al Mohler, Part Five 2006-11-06T03:00:00+00:00 Adrian Warnock

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It is a real pleasure to welcome to my blog again today, Dr. Albert Mohler. Dr. Mohler should need no introduction to most of my readers, but I include a link to his biography for any who need to know more, as well as a link to my Together for the Gospel Conference Round Up Post.

This interview is being serialized over several days. So far I have published parts one, two, three, and four. Today we discuss the Together For the Gospel statement released at the conference.

Adrian
Up until now, Together for the Gospel has been founded, as far as I can tell, purely on the relationships of you four guys – what made you decide to issue a joint statement of faith and is that how you all see the document?

Dr. Mohler
I should clarify that we do not see our document as a statement of faith, presented in confessional form, but as a statement of common convictions and concern. We are not seeking to supplant the historic creeds and confessions of our faith, but we are speaking to a specific set of urgent concerns that are based in a specific set of deeply held convictions. We would see the document as a manifesto of concern, not as a replacement for our creeds and confessions.

Adrian
What was the practical process behind this document – there is a rumour circulating that you wrote it yourself with very limited input from the others – is that a fair description?

Dr. Mohler
Well, in the actual writing process, that is true. Nevertheless, the document grew out of our investment in hundreds of hours of conversation. Beyond this, all four of us contributed topics and concerns we wanted to be in the statement. I wrote the original draft, but the final product represents all four of us.

Adrian
How much did other similar documents influence your work on this document – which previous statements of faith did you draw upon?

Dr. Mohler
In terms of previous statements of faith, I drew upon a wide range of documents from the Reformation tradition—especially the tradition closest to our own. Beyond that, previous statements of crucial evangelical concern were also informative. We were particularly informed by movements and statements such as those associated with the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, and similar movements.

Adrian
Do you think it is important that every generation works though theological positions based, at least in part, on the theological contoversies of its age?

Dr. Mohler
This is certainly true. It was true in the early fourth century when Athanasius helped the church to forge an orthodox Christology at Nicaea. Every generation brings its own theological controversies, and it is especially important that we work through these controversies in a way that honors God’s truth and protects the deposit of faith entrusted to us.

Adrian
Some have speculated that you plan on using this document as some kind of yardstick of orthodoxy – is that true? Do you plan to anathematise those who cannot sign it for some reason? What kind of uses do you imagine it being put to?

Dr. Mohler
Actually, those are functions that belong to churches and denominations. The four of us claim no power to anathematize those who could not or would not sign the document. At the same time, we do hope that the statement helps to define what leads to health and to unhealth in Christ’s church. In terms of our cooperation and our willingness to recognize evangelical identity, this statement is indeed intended as something of a standard. We would not claim to be the universal arbiters of orthodoxy in Christ’s church. Our goal is simply to offer a word of witness and to make clear where our own sense of cooperation for the cause of the Gospel is defined. Our statement is a clear and heartfelt call to biblical fidelity.

Adrian
When considering the positions which you would include in the document, what criteria did you use for your theological triage? There are some issues that you address and have a position on that some people would see as peripheral, and others that you don’t address that others would also say were fairly essential.

Dr. Mohler
Those are fair questions. In the first place, we did not seek to repeat the good work accomplished by other movements and organizations. As I’ve already mentioned, we assumed the work of groups such as the International Council of Biblical Inerrancy. Thus, we did not seek to replicate the Chicago Statement released by that organization in defense of biblical inerrancy. Similarly, we were not seeking to write a new creed or confession of faith, so there is an entire range of doctrines that are not directly addressed in our statement. We directed ourselves to those issues and concerns that we felt had not been adequately addressed by previous movements. Even within our statement, we recognize that not all issues are of equal consequence. Nevertheless, we did sense that these issues shared a common urgency.

Adrian
I mean, to make it specific, I have seen some people asking why you see modes and the practice of baptism as not requiring a joint position to work together on. Why is that?

Dr. Mohler
The answer to that question is quite simple—we are deeply committed to our own confessions of faith and we are quite clear about those commitments. There is no ambiguity in the fact that Ligon Duncan is a Presbyterian pastor. I can hardly hide from the fact that I am, by deep conviction, a Baptist. Mark is also a Baptist, and C.J. is a representative of a newer tradition, deeply rooted in the faith once for all delivered to the saints. If we intended our statement to be adopted by any specific group of churches, we would be obligated to speak to those specific questions related to baptism. But, as this was not our purpose or focus, it would have been foreign and strange for us to have addressed that question in this document. I would point once again to the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. It spoke directly to the issue that brought that group together—bi

blical inerrancy—and not to a host of other, equally important issues.

Adrian
Others on the net have already expressed surprise that you seem to view the role of women in ministry as essential enough to working together to include in the document. What guided that decision?

Dr. Mohler
The decision on complementarianism as a common tenet grew out of a mixture of our conviction and experience. We recognize that there are true Christians who disagree with us on these issues. Nevertheless, the issue of the role of women has now risen to a status and significance that makes common effort extremely difficult. For one thing, such common effort requires the implicit, if not explicit, recognition of women as pastors. We consider this issue to be so important, and the biblical issues so crucial, that we do not see this cooperation as advisable or healthy.

Adrian
And what of the lack of a mention of any statement concerning the charismatic issue – why was that left out?

Dr. Mohler
Interestingly, this was not even a major issue of discussion. None of us is a charismatic in any conventional sense. Our understanding of these issues is sufficiently clear and united that it has never become an issue of consequence among us. It is fair to say that the issue did not emerge as a topic suggested for inclusion in the statement. This is not because we are not concerned about these issues. I am particularly concerned about the excesses of the charismatic movement. Nevertheless, this was just not our concern in this project.

Adrian
As a Southern Baptist, you can’t get away from an interview like this without being asked about the recent decision of the SBC IMB to exclude tongues-speakers from all future missions appointments. What is your perspective on this? At first sight, it would seem to be contrary to the spirit of “together for the Gospel” or is this in some way different because it is taking place back in the world of denominational relationships where I assume you would want to hold more tightly to some of the distinctives?

Dr. Mohler
Your last statement is precisely where I am headed. I must also stipulate that the decision to exclude those who speak in tongues from mission appointments is not actually a new policy at all. The new policy relates to what some have called a “private prayer language,” but is not, in the main, associated with what most people consider speaking in tongues. I do not consider this practice to have any adequate biblical foundation. Nevertheless, I am able to work together with persons who might practice such things in the cause of the Gospel. Nevertheless, this would not be an institutional unity but a unity in the spirit of Christ.

In other words, I can celebrate the fact that some of my charismatic brothers will lead persons to Christ and preach the Gospel with authenticity. Nevertheless, it would be impossible for me to establish a church together or for us to be united in a denomination’s position on these questions. There is no question that the Southern Baptist Convention is not a charismatic denomination. It never has been and, so far as I can foresee, it is not open to being so in the future. Nevertheless, our missionaries gladly work alongside charismatic missionaries and our pastors gladly work in the same community with charismatic pastors. I think some persons confuse institutional and spiritual unity in these matters.

Adrian
In thinking about the issues on which you have chosen to make a stand together and those that you have not, I guess one of the conclusions I have come to is that you have chosen to address issues where either compromise in those areas in some way threatens the Gospel, or where it is possible for a group to work together for the Gospel without any of the individuals compromising their position.

Thus, for example, those who believe that certain acts of ministry should only be taken by women would struggle with working together with the women preachers who thought otherwise without compromising that position. On the other hand, since when you get together no one is baptising anyone else, it is possible for different positions to co-exist without anyone repudiating their positon. Is that a fair conclusion for me to have come to? Do you concur?

Dr. Mohler
I think that is a very fair summary of our approach. You have delineated very well the distinctions on these issues.

Continued in Part Six . . . .

Albert Mohler

Previous Post

November 5, 2006

INTERVIEW - Al Mohler, Part Four

Next Post

November 7, 2006 INTERVIEW - Al Mohler, Part Six

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 and 2 Corinthians 1 and 2 Thessalonians 1 and 2 Timothy 1 John 300 Leaders A Life of Joy Abortion Acts of the Apostles Adrian on radio Adrian on TV Adrian's Story Albert Mohler Amazing Grace Arminocalvinist Spectrum Assurance Atonement Atonement Series Attributes of God Barnabas Best of the Blog Bible Bible Software Bible Translation Biblical Inerrancy Billy Graham Bob Roberts Books C. J. Mahaney Calvinism Cessationism Charis Warnock Charismatic Spectrum Charles Simeon Charles Spurgeon Church Leadership Colossians Complementarian - Egalitarian Spectrum Complementarianism Conferences Culture Daniel Debates Deuteronomy DGM08 DGM13 Discernment Doctrine Don Carson Ed Stetzer Eddy Leo Ephesians ESV Bible Translators Interview Evangelism in a Post-Christian World evolution Exodus Expository Preaching Ezekial Faith and Feelings Family Florida Galatians General Genesis Get Wisdom - Proverbs sermons Gifts of The Holy Spirit Gifts of the Holy Spirit 2006 Global Faith Forum Godly Attitudes Gospel Gospels Grace Greg Haslam Grudem vs Piper: The Baptism Debate Healing Heaven Hell and Rob Bell Hebrews Henry Tyler Henry Warnock Holy Spirit Holy Spirit Baptism Hope Reborn Hugh Palmer Irresistable Grace Isaiah J. I. Packer Jack Hayford Joel Joel Warnock John John Lanferman John MacArthur John Newton John Owen John Piper John Smyth Jonathan Edwards Josh Harris Justification Justin Taylor Kenneth Ulmer Leadership Leadership Lessons from 1 & 2 Samuel Lex Loizides Liam Goligher Lig Duncan Limited Atonement Lou Fellingham Mark Dever Mark Driscoll Martyn Lloyd-Jones Matt Chandler Mental Health Missionary Methods: St Paul’s or Ours? My Story N. T. Wright Nehemiah NWA08 NWA09 NWA10 Opinion OT History Books Pentateuch Personal Personal Revival Philippians PJ Smyth Podcast Politics Preaching Prophecy Proverbs Psalms Raised With Christ Reformed Charismatic Regeneration Relationships Resurrection Resurrection & Salvation Revival Rice Broocks Rich Man and Lazarus Rick Warren Rob Rufus Roland Allen Romans Sam Storms Sanctification Series Sermons Sermons on Philippians Serving Jesus at Work Sexuality Sin St Paul Steve Chalke Strange Fire Suffering T4G T4G Statement TAB09 Tamasin Warnock Teamwork Terry Virgo The Atonement Debate - Chalke book The Soulwinner The Spirit-Filled Church The Traitor Within Theologcial Spectrums Theosis Tim Challies Tim Keller Titus TOAM06 TOAM07 TOAM08 TOAM09 TOAM10 TOAM11 Todd Bentley Tope Koleoso Total Depravity Video Water Baptism Wayne Grudem Worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 May 2025 April 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 June 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet predicted God would pour out His Spirit on all people?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Micah Amos Hosea

Books by This Author Books by Adrian Warnock

See All Titles »