Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Martyn Lloyd-Jones – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 4

Martyn Lloyd-Jones – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 4

Last updated on: October 30, 2006 at 11:48 am by Adrian Warnock

Martyn Lloyd-Jones – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 4 2006-10-30T11:48:00+00:00 Adrian Warnock

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Since it has been over a month since my last MLJ post, I will briefly review my previous posts in this series. As I have already indicated, the doctor’s teaching on the subject of the Holy Spirit is that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is distinct from conversion. MLJ then discusses three Scripture verses that are commonly used by cessationists to refute this belief: Luke 11:13; Acts 2:37-39; and 1 Corinthians 12:13.

In part 1, the Doctor outlined two principles. The first principle was that those who are going to ask the Father for the Holy Spirit are those who know they are His children and address Him as their heavenly Father. The second principle was that the text implies a kind of gradation of asking, seeking, and knocking that signifies seeking for, a striving after this gift of the Holy Spirit.

In part 2, the Doctor argued that the gift (or baptism) of the Holy Spirit is promised, but simply because it is promised does not automatically mean it is given to everyone. Rather, the promise is a general one accompanied by conditions; in other words, as Christians we become candidates for these promises.

In part 3, in MLJ shows how the Corinthians text does not, in fact, deal with the baptism of the Holy Spirit at all. He explores the Greek meaning of the word en in this text and contrasts its grammatical implications with the use of the word en in other New Testament texts. He concludes that this kind of verb is not found in other passages in which it is used, and therefore rendering “baptized by means of the spirit” is correct for the Corinthians passage, but not correct for the other texts.

“For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit.” 1 Cor 12:13 (ESV)

“For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body . . . and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.” (KJV)

Today, in the final post in this series, Lloyd-Jones will explain a second reason why he believes that 1 Corinthians 12:13 does not deal with the doctrine of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, and therefore is a verse used inappropriately by cessationists to argue their position.

“But there are other reasons, quite apart from grammar, which make this perfectly plain and clear. In every reference to baptism with the Spirit, the Baptizer is the Lord Jesus Christ, and what he does when he baptizes with the Spirit is what we have seen. It is a baptism to give power, to create witnesses, to enable us to testify. ‘Tarry,’ he says, ‘at Jerusalem until ye shall have received power.’ The whole object, as we have seen so abundantly, of the baptism with the Spirit, is to give us such an assurance and to fill us with such power that we become living witnesses and testifiers to the truth as it is in Christ Jesus; we become his witnesses. That is the purpose of the baptism with the Spirit and it is a baptism that is done by the Lord Jesus Christ.”

MLJ then shows how the apostle in the 1 Corinthians text is, in his view, “dealing with something entirely different.” He believes that the emphasis here is on the unity of the believers in one body of Christ.

“Then he goes on. Listen, he says, I have got an illustration. ‘As the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.’ He says it is because by one Spirit we have all been baptized into one body of Christ, whether we are Jews, or Gentiles; and we have all been made to drink into the one and only Spirit. He is continuing with the activity of the Spirit, and that is why, undoubtedly, these Authorized translators and all the others, apart from the Revised Version, have deliberately translated this with ‘by’ — ‘ . . . by the Spirit’.

It is a continuation of his account of the action and the activity of the Holy Spirit, and what he is talking about here is not power, it is not witness; he is here reminding them that every Christian is one who is born again. That is true of all Christians . . . it is the Holy Spirit acting in regeneration.

But the Holy Spirit at the moment of regeneration also takes each person who is regenerated and puts him into the body of Christ—places and introduces him into it. That is the force and the meaning of the word. And what he is saying here, therefore, is this: Now the Spirit who has given you these different gifts, the same Spirit also has taken every one of you and put you into the body of Christ, so that you must never think of yourselves as separate units. He is reinforcing his main and general argument. It is no part of his concern here to deal with the doctrine of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The illustration is simply to show that all Christians, whether they were Jews or Gentiles . . . are now ‘one in Christ Jesus’ . . . And that, he says, is the action and the work of the Holy Spirit.

Now you see the contrast; it is the Lord himself who baptizes us ‘with’ the Spirit, but it is nowhere taught in the Scripture that the Lord engrafts us into his own body. No, that is the work of the Spirit. His work is to regenerate us, to engraft us into Christ, to place us in him to ‘baptize’ us if you like into the body. All along, this is the activity of the Spirit. It is the Spirit who applies salvation to us right the way through, and that is true of every Christian . . .

[This verse] has no reference whatsoever to the doctrine of the baptism with the Spirit or the blessing which comes to those who have been baptized with the Spirit. So this verse, which some people seem to think is crucial, not only does not contradict what we have been saying, but tends to prove it, and that to the very hilt, because we have seen so clearly and in so many different places that there are people described in Acts who have believed and have been baptized, but still the apostles had to lay their hands upon them before they received the gift of the Holy Spirit. They were already regenerate, as the apostles themselves were before the day of Pentecost, but they had not been baptized with the Holy Spirit.”

You may not agree with Martyn Lloyd-Jones’ interpretation of this verse, but I think it is worthwhile repeating it here. The theological debates about what you should call an experience of the Holy Spirit should not, in my view, remove the absolute necessity that we recognise the reality of two clearly distinct works of the Spirit. Some would argue that Paul means in the first clause here to describe the same event as baptism with the Spirit, others that he does indeed mean something different. In either case, we should not jump to the conclusion that there is therefore no second experience to seek for.

I should point out the consideration that Paul’s use of the word “all” here in no way means that every Christian has to have the experience described – for we know that the biblical use of the word “all”

is not always as clear-cut as we in English tend to understand. But even if we do come to the conclusion that “all” really is “all” here, then there are still two further points to make.

The first is that just because “all” of Paul’s original readers experienced an event does not mean necessarily that we all have also exeperienced that same event. It is quite possible that a normal part of the conversion process – the conscious receiving of the Spirit – might have in some way been lost and needs reclaiming without these words being in any sense untrue.

The second point is that ultimately this can become an argument of terminology. One thing on which few commentators seem to focus when considering this verse is that the second half actually seems to speak of a different event. So, far from being a proof verse against a second experience of the Spirit, in this verse we have Paul telling us that his readers had both been baptised “by” the Spirit into Christ’s body and had been given this same Spirit to “drink.” You don’t need to drink the Spirit in order for Him to add you to Christ’s body!

I remain convinced that the balance of Scripture teaches us that there is a secret act of the Spirit in regenerating us and joining us to Christ of which we may not be aware save for its effects in us. Many a believer feels that the faith he now feels is his own – little does he know that it has been produced in him by the Spirit, that a rebirth has happened. If you want to call that event the baptism with the Spirit, then at least recognise that it is an event that is centred on joining the believer to the body of Christ.

Believers are, however, to desire and expect that we might “drink” of the Spirit or “receive” him. This event is something that we will recognise when it happens. I do not believe it is a once-for-all event. We are to keep coming back for more drink! We are to desire and savour the Spirit and yearn for more conscious awareness of Him as a person who is at work in every believer. What is the difference between the Spirit-filled believer and the one who when asked, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” would have a similar answer to the Ephesians in Acts 19:2? Is it that the Spirit is not working in the latter? Absolutely not. The Spirit is at work in every believer. It is simply that the one who is “full” of the Spirit, who has drunk of the Spirit – who has received the Spirit, is one who has a vivid experience of the third person of the Trinity as a reality in their lives.

If that experience is not true of you, then I pray that it will become so soon!

All emphasis mine.

Excerpts from this post were taken from:

D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Joy Unspeakable – The Baptism and Gifts of the Holy Spirit, Christopher Catherwood, Ed., Combined edition of Joy Unspeakable (1984) and Prove All Things (1985), Kingsway Publications, Eastbourne, England, 1995, “Something Worth Striving For”, chapter 18, pp. 333-335.

Ephesians

Holy Spirit Baptism

Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Previous Post

October 30, 2006

BLOGDOM TODAY - Car-jacking, Missional Swim Trunks, and the Holy Spirit

Next Post

October 31, 2006 BLOGGING THE GIFTS - Discernment of Spirits

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 and 2 Corinthians 1 and 2 Thessalonians 1 and 2 Timothy 1 John 300 Leaders A Life of Joy Abortion Acts of the Apostles Adrian on radio Adrian on TV Adrian's Story Albert Mohler Amazing Grace Arminocalvinist Spectrum Assurance Atonement Atonement Series Attributes of God Barnabas Best of the Blog Bible Bible Software Bible Translation Biblical Inerrancy Billy Graham Bob Roberts Books C. J. Mahaney Calvinism Cessationism Charis Warnock Charismatic Spectrum Charles Simeon Charles Spurgeon Church Leadership Colossians Complementarian - Egalitarian Spectrum Complementarianism Conferences Culture Daniel Debates Deuteronomy DGM08 DGM13 Discernment Doctrine Don Carson Ed Stetzer Eddy Leo Ephesians ESV Bible Translators Interview Evangelism in a Post-Christian World evolution Exodus Expository Preaching Ezekial Faith and Feelings Family Florida Galatians General Genesis Get Wisdom - Proverbs sermons Gifts of The Holy Spirit Gifts of the Holy Spirit 2006 Global Faith Forum Godly Attitudes Gospel Gospels Grace Greg Haslam Grudem vs Piper: The Baptism Debate Healing Heaven Hell and Rob Bell Hebrews Henry Tyler Henry Warnock Holy Spirit Holy Spirit Baptism Hope Reborn Hugh Palmer Irresistable Grace Isaiah J. I. Packer Jack Hayford Joel Joel Warnock John John Lanferman John MacArthur John Newton John Owen John Piper John Smyth Jonathan Edwards Josh Harris Justification Justin Taylor Kenneth Ulmer Leadership Leadership Lessons from 1 & 2 Samuel Lex Loizides Liam Goligher Lig Duncan Limited Atonement Lou Fellingham Mark Dever Mark Driscoll Martyn Lloyd-Jones Matt Chandler Mental Health Missionary Methods: St Paul’s or Ours? My Story N. T. Wright Nehemiah NWA08 NWA09 NWA10 Opinion OT History Books Pentateuch Personal Personal Revival Philippians PJ Smyth Podcast Politics Preaching Prophecy Proverbs Psalms Raised With Christ Reformed Charismatic Regeneration Relationships Resurrection Resurrection & Salvation Revival Rice Broocks Rich Man and Lazarus Rick Warren Rob Rufus Roland Allen Romans Sam Storms Sanctification Series Sermons Sermons on Philippians Serving Jesus at Work Sexuality Sin St Paul Steve Chalke Strange Fire Suffering T4G T4G Statement TAB09 Tamasin Warnock Teamwork Terry Virgo The Atonement Debate - Chalke book The Soulwinner The Spirit-Filled Church The Traitor Within Theologcial Spectrums Theosis Tim Challies Tim Keller Titus TOAM06 TOAM07 TOAM08 TOAM09 TOAM10 TOAM11 Todd Bentley Tope Koleoso Total Depravity Video Water Baptism Wayne Grudem Worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 May 2025 April 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 June 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who opposed the rebuilding of the Temple and tried to discourage the Jews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Their enemies/Samaritans Amalekites Philistines Moabites

Books by This Author Books by Adrian Warnock

See All Titles »