Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
MLJ Monday – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 3

MLJ Monday – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 3

Last updated on: September 25, 2006 at 10:06 am by Adrian Warnock

62 Comments

MLJ Monday – Something Worth Fighting For, Part 3 2006-09-25T10:06:00+01:00 Adrian Warnock

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We now come to the third and last verse that cessationists use to deny that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is an experience separate from conversion, and the verse to which Lloyd-Jones was most anxious to reply.

“For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink with one Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 12:13)

This verse, says the Doctor,

“is the familiar argument [that] is being used . . . by those who do not believe in the baptism with the Holy Spirit as a separate experience. They maintain that this one verse is enough in and of itself. But that raises the real question — does the verse say that? I want to try to demonstrate, further, that the verse not only does not say that, but that this verse does not deal at all with the doctrine of the baptism with the Holy Spirit.”

This week we will focus on the first part the Doctor’s statement, i.e. that this verse does not say that.**

To paraphrase the Doctor, in the original Greek the word “by” in ‘For BY one Spirit’ is actually translated, ‘For IN one Spirit’, and cessationists therefore argue that this verse says that we have been baptized “in” the Spirit into the body of Christ, and that this is established by the use of the Greek word en which, it is argued, ALWAYS means ‘in’ and not ‘by.’ It is extremely interesting then, Lloyd-Jones points out, that practically all translations (i.e. those available at the time he wrote this) and many authorities (Moffatt, the American Williams, Arthur S. Way, J. N. Darby) translate this word as ‘by’, knowing full well that the word en is used. The only answer is that the word en is used in a casual sense, and this is confirmed by the great lexicons (including Arndt and Gingrish). Examples where the word en is used in the instrumental sense, and furthermore that it would make no sense at all to translate it “in”, can be found in Matthew 26:52 (all they that take the sword shall perish with [en] the sword); Matthew 7:6 (neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under [en] their feet); Luke 1:51; and Romans 5:9 (Much more then, being now justified by [en] his blood). MLJ argues, therefore, that purely on the basis of grammar, there can be no objection whatsoever to translating this word en as ‘by’.

The Doctor then reinforces his argument by quoting extensively from a book called The Untranslatable Riches from the New Testament Greek, written by a famous Greek scholar from America, Dr. Wuest, who deals with this very verse. I will copy this quote here because of its importance in understanding the linguistics of this verse:

Baptize means “to place into” or to “introduce into” . . . The word Spirit is in the instrumental case in the Greek. Personal agency is expressed occasionally by the instrumental case. At such times the verb is always in the passive or middle voice. The Greek construction here follows this role of Greek grammar. The personal agent in this case who does the baptizing is the Holy Spirit. He places or introduces the believing sinner into the body of which the Lord Jesus is the living Head. We could translate therefore “by means of the personal agency of one Spirit we all were placed in one body.”

It is not the baptism with the Spirit, or of the Spirit, in the sense that the Holy Spirit is the element that is applied to us; it is the baptism by the Spirit. This baptism does not bring the Spirit to us in the sense that God places the Spirit upon us or in us; rather this baptism brings the believer into vital union with Jesus Christ. This means that the baptism by the Spirit is not for power, for in this baptism there is nothing applied or given to the believer.

As Lloyd-Jones explains, Dr. Wuest

then compares and contrasts this statement with the statement that you have in Luke 3:16 where John the Baptist said to the company, ‘But one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose; he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire.’ And it is the same little word en there. Dr. Wuest takes that statement and John 1:31, with which we are dealing, and Acts 1:5, and Acts 11:16 and so on and states:

This kind of a verb is not found in the passages quoted from Matthew to Acts, but is found in 1 Corinthians 12:13. Therefore our rendering “baptized by means of the Spirit” is correct for the Corinthian passage, but not correct for those others commented upon. The phrase ‘with the Spirit’ therefore defines what baptism is referred to, and the words “by means of the Spirit” speak of the fact that the Holy Spirit is the Divine Agent who himself baptizes, the purpose of which baptism is to place the believing sinner into vital union with Jesus Christ and thus make him a member of the body of which Christ is the living Head.

Lloyd-Jones concludes:

That to me is most important because there you have one of the greatest authorities on these matters in this present century, and I could have quoted even more. His whole argument comes to this — that here in 1 Corinthians 12:13 there is something quite different from all the other mentionings of baptism with the Holy Spirit. This is not referring to the baptism with the Spirit, and he gives his grammatical reasons for saying that.

Next week we will conclude this series when Lloyd-Jones explains why 1 Corinthians 12:13 actually does not even deal with the doctrine of the baptism with the Holy Spirit. While cessationists hold this verse to be crucial in their argument, it not only does not contradict the continuationists’ argument, but rather tends to prove it – if you believe Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones’ interpretation, and, of course, you are now cordially invited to disagree with him in this comment section!

All emphasis mine.

Excerpts from this past were taken from:

D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones,

Joy Unspeakable – The Baptism and Gifts of the Holy Spirit, Christopher Catherwood, Ed., Combined edition of Joy Unspeakable (1984) and Prove All Things (1985), Kingsway Publications, Eastbourne, England, 1995, “Something Worth Striving For”, chapter 18, pp. 329-333.

Holy Spirit Baptism

Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Romans

Previous Post

September 24, 2006

London Theology for All Conference Information

Next Post

September 26, 2006 BOOK - Surprised by the Power of the Spirit - Jack Deere

Recent Comments

62 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 and 2 Corinthians 1 and 2 Thessalonians 1 and 2 Timothy 1 John 300 Leaders A Life of Joy Abortion Acts of the Apostles Adrian on radio Adrian on TV Adrian's Story Albert Mohler Amazing Grace Arminocalvinist Spectrum Assurance Atonement Atonement Series Attributes of God Barnabas Best of the Blog Bible Bible Software Bible Translation Biblical Inerrancy Billy Graham Bob Roberts Books C. J. Mahaney Calvinism Cessationism Charis Warnock Charismatic Spectrum Charles Simeon Charles Spurgeon Church Leadership Colossians Complementarian - Egalitarian Spectrum Complementarianism Conferences Culture Daniel Debates Deuteronomy DGM08 DGM13 Discernment Doctrine Don Carson Ed Stetzer Eddy Leo Ephesians ESV Bible Translators Interview Evangelism in a Post-Christian World evolution Exodus Expository Preaching Ezekial Faith and Feelings Family Florida Galatians General Genesis Get Wisdom - Proverbs sermons Gifts of The Holy Spirit Gifts of the Holy Spirit 2006 Global Faith Forum Godly Attitudes Gospel Gospels Grace Greg Haslam Grudem vs Piper: The Baptism Debate Healing Heaven Hell and Rob Bell Hebrews Henry Tyler Henry Warnock Holy Spirit Holy Spirit Baptism Hope Reborn Hugh Palmer Irresistable Grace Isaiah J. I. Packer Jack Hayford Joel Joel Warnock John John Lanferman John MacArthur John Newton John Owen John Piper John Smyth Jonathan Edwards Josh Harris Justification Justin Taylor Kenneth Ulmer Leadership Leadership Lessons from 1 & 2 Samuel Lex Loizides Liam Goligher Lig Duncan Limited Atonement Lou Fellingham Mark Dever Mark Driscoll Martyn Lloyd-Jones Matt Chandler Mental Health Missionary Methods: St Paul’s or Ours? My Story N. T. Wright Nehemiah NWA08 NWA09 NWA10 Opinion OT History Books Pentateuch Personal Personal Revival Philippians PJ Smyth Podcast Politics Preaching Prophecy Proverbs Psalms Raised With Christ Reformed Charismatic Regeneration Relationships Resurrection Resurrection & Salvation Revival Rice Broocks Rich Man and Lazarus Rick Warren Rob Rufus Roland Allen Romans Sam Storms Sanctification Series Sermons Sermons on Philippians Serving Jesus at Work Sexuality Sin St Paul Steve Chalke Strange Fire Suffering T4G T4G Statement TAB09 Tamasin Warnock Teamwork Terry Virgo The Atonement Debate - Chalke book The Soulwinner The Spirit-Filled Church The Traitor Within Theologcial Spectrums Theosis Tim Challies Tim Keller Titus TOAM06 TOAM07 TOAM08 TOAM09 TOAM10 TOAM11 Todd Bentley Tope Koleoso Total Depravity Video Water Baptism Wayne Grudem Worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 May 2025 April 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 June 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Ezra famously do upon learning about the people's intermarriage?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fasted for 40 days Broke the tablets Tore his robe and pulled hair Fled to Babylon

Books by This Author Books by Adrian Warnock

See All Titles »