Post-Evangelicalism

Last updated on: July 6, 2018 at 10:56 am by Adrian Warnock

Post-Evangelicalism 2018-07-06T10:56:45+01:00 Adrian Warnock

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Life In The Cultlane responded in my comments section to my post What is an evangelical? I thought I would include the post in its entirety here and comment as we go.

Hi! I seem to have sparked quite some discussion.

For context – I’m a New Zealander, I consider myself Christian, I grew up from 1971-1989 in a church that I would consider Pentecostal (‘Indigenous Pentecostal’, ie, NZ homegrown) and inspired directly by Smith Wigglesworth. This church very definitely suffered from ‘paranoia and elitism’ – we believed we were the only Christians left in the world and that the world was going to hell, as most especially any other so-called Christians.

My question here is – did you believe that those who weren’t true Christians were going to hell or that those not in a church like yours? There is of course all the difference in the world between these two views. It sounds like your impression was clearly the second, but unfortunately it can sometimes be hard to distinguish between the two and it is possible to get the opposite impression from what is intended.

In 1989 my family finally left this church and became involved with a movement called ‘Rise Up Together New Zealand’ which I guess you could call Pentecostal in spirituality, but Evangelical in doctrine. Evangelical/Charismatic. I was then involved with the Vineyard Church NZ which I am still connected with, but now (since 2003) find my closest home at the moment in a Baptist church which is loosely affiliated with Brian McLaren’s ‘Emergent’ network. (Which is not in itself a denomination but a sort of informal network across denominations).

I find the definitions of words to be a source of quite a lot of confusion. I use the word ‘Evangelical’ in the sociological sense to mean ‘the churches aligned with the Evangelical Movement, ie, the cluster of Western Protestant churches which broke away from the Fundamentalist movement in the early 20th century’. As opposed to, eg, the Catholic church, the Orthodox church, the ‘Anabaptist’ churches (Amish, Mennonite, Quaker), or the ‘mainline Protestant’ churches (such as Reformed, Anglican, Presbyterian, Methodist) which tend to take a similar political line and cluster together. I am aware that there are evangelical wings within the mainline denominations, but for the most part when I say ‘evangelical’ I refer to the Baptists and the various newer Pentecostal/Charismatic denominations such as Elim, Assembly of God, etc.

On the whole, generally the ‘evangelical’ churches tend toward politics that could be described as ‘right-wing’ or ‘conservative’, and the ‘mainline’ churches toward ‘left-wing’ or ‘liberal’ politics. I am also aware that the meaning of these labels has drifted over time and is confusingly defined even at present, but most people have at least a similar understanding of these terms.

‘Post-evangelical’ is a term coined by Dave Tomlinson in his 1995 book ‘The Post-Evangelical’, and describes a church movement which has sprung out of the Evangelical movement and shares many, but not all, of its values. This is the sub-movement to which I consider I belong, and which is roughly the same / overlaps loosely with the movement self-described as ‘the emerging church’ and the ‘alternative worship’ movement (which are not quite the same things either, but close enough for now).

So…

So perhaps post-evangelicals are those who still believe in God but are feeling rather hopeless about the state of the world today, and have lost the faith in the onward march of the gospel felt by evangelicals?

Not quite. As I explained, by the word ‘post-evangelical’ I don’t mean that I feel hopeless about the progress of the Gospel. But I feel that the particular ‘gospel’ which, by and large, is promoted by the movement calling itself the ‘evangelical church’ is not in fact the Gospel of Jesus. And the particular politics which the self-described ‘evangelical church’ has, in the latter half of the 20th century, associated itself with, tends to value things that I don’t believe Jesus valued.

My politics tends toward the ‘seamless garment’ or ‘consistent ethic of life’: which is to say, anti-handgun (eep, I’m no conservative!), anti-abortion (eep, I’m no liberal!), anti-nuclear-weapons, anti-war… pro restorative justice, pro redistribution of wealth to the poor.

On sexuality, I find myself torn. On the one hand, it seems the Bible (if you ignore, say, the bits about how many wives and concubines David or Solomon had while still being called godly) is fairly consistent about sex being about a lifelong commitment between a man and a woman. I don’t have a problem with that. On the other hand, I’m not really a fan of using government power backed by violence to force people into ‘moral’ sexual behaviour that they would otherwise not want to do. Hence my angst about things like the Civil Union Bill.

There is, I’m ashamed to admit, a strong streak of authoritarianism running through the Evangelical church movement, and especially the Pentecostal subsector. The ‘I’m the Pastor because I’m annointed of God and you will do as I say’ model. I think this is a bad thing and would favour something more along Quaker lines – I believe the ‘priesthood of all believers’ means that God speaks to individuals… *lots* of individuals… not necessarily to lone, powerful, commanding leader-figures (or at least, not *more* to them than to the poor or the lame, etc). I don’t disbelieve in the concept of absolute truth, but I am skeptical given sinful human nature about the ability of a few ‘strong’ individuals to find it for themselves and then impose it on others – I have seen from experience how strongly authoritarian churches can go bad. So I tend toward thinking democracy is pretty much the best political system

“If the moral foundation of Western law and civilisation falls apart – well, that’s better than trying to hold it together by force. Sometimes there’s nothing you can do and you just have to let things die.”

As to this… bear in mind, the Gospel of Jesus as I understand it is a story of death and resurrection. You can’t have the Empty Tomb without Golgotha. There is such a thing as trying to hold back the wind – whether it be birth or death, there comes a point where the cost of trying to impose a minority’s viewpoint – no matter how technically ‘right’ that may be – on an unwilling people becomes neither Christian nor human.

Do we believe that our God raises the dead? Then let us be prepared to let the dream of ‘Christendom’ – a society where the laws of Christ are enforced with the weapons and violence of man – die. If the only way to save ‘our Christian heritage’ is though dressing up and acting like a Nuremberg Rally… that kind of Christian heritage we don’t need.

Jesus said, ‘They will see your good works and glorify your Father who is in heaven.’ Not ‘they will hear your good words and obey.’ We don’t need to try to make people be moral. We want to act in such a way that they see us and want what we’ve got.

What is it that we have – other than the need to have people listen to us and give us unquestioned obedience? What would our gospel be if nobody ever listened to us but it was only our own actions, gifted to the world in secret?

When we look inside our hearts and our history and can answer that positively, then we will truly be Evangelicals in all senses of the word.

Meh. That link didn’t work. Here it is – take a look for yourself and see what you think this looks like. Why are liberals afraid that Christians are closet Nazis? http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0408/S00251.htm

I guess the most important point at issue is how much should we try and use the law to impose Christian values on a pagan society. Christians will differ on this- even quite conservative ones might want to leave well alone as far as the law is concened.

So it seems all in all that provided it is understood properly ‘evangelical’ remains a word I am happy to identify with and so, thanks to Nate, the title will remain for the time being at least in this blog.

As to emergent church, I guess that is a topic for another day. Suffice it to say that I share in a number of the sentiments- especially the criticism of much of the organised church. I am not convinced that the wholesale embracing of post-modern ideals is helpful. Christians need to adapt in their styles, yes, but our primary source for how to do church should always be the bible and not the modern culture.

Abortion

Church history

Previous Post

August 25, 2004

What is an evangelical?

Next Post

August 25, 2004 Bloggers with a future

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 and 2 Corinthians 1 and 2 Thessalonians 1 and 2 Timothy 1 John 300 Leaders A Life of Joy Abortion Acts of the Apostles Adrian on radio Adrian on TV Adrian's Story Albert Mohler Amazing Grace Arminocalvinist Spectrum Assurance Atonement Atonement Series Attributes of God Barnabas Best of the Blog Bible Bible Software Bible Translation Biblical Inerrancy Billy Graham Bob Roberts Books C. J. Mahaney Calvinism Cessationism Charis Warnock Charismatic Spectrum Charles Simeon Charles Spurgeon Church Leadership Colossians Complementarian - Egalitarian Spectrum Complementarianism Conferences Culture Daniel Debates Deuteronomy DGM08 DGM13 Discernment Doctrine Don Carson Ed Stetzer Eddy Leo Ephesians ESV Bible Translators Interview Evangelism in a Post-Christian World evolution Exodus Expository Preaching Ezekial Faith and Feelings Family Florida Galatians General Genesis Get Wisdom - Proverbs sermons Gifts of The Holy Spirit Gifts of the Holy Spirit 2006 Global Faith Forum Godly Attitudes Gospel Gospels Grace Greg Haslam Grudem vs Piper: The Baptism Debate Healing Heaven Hell and Rob Bell Hebrews Henry Tyler Henry Warnock Holy Spirit Holy Spirit Baptism Hope Reborn Hugh Palmer Irresistable Grace Isaiah J. I. Packer Jack Hayford Joel Joel Warnock John John Lanferman John MacArthur John Newton John Owen John Piper John Smyth Jonathan Edwards Josh Harris Justification Justin Taylor Kenneth Ulmer Leadership Leadership Lessons from 1 & 2 Samuel Lex Loizides Liam Goligher Lig Duncan Limited Atonement Lou Fellingham Mark Dever Mark Driscoll Martyn Lloyd-Jones Matt Chandler Mental Health Missionary Methods: St Paul’s or Ours? My Story N. T. Wright Nehemiah NWA08 NWA09 NWA10 Opinion OT History Books Pentateuch Personal Personal Revival Philippians PJ Smyth Podcast Politics Preaching Prophecy Proverbs Psalms Raised With Christ Reformed Charismatic Regeneration Relationships Resurrection Resurrection & Salvation Revival Rice Broocks Rich Man and Lazarus Rick Warren Rob Rufus Roland Allen Romans Sam Storms Sanctification Series Sermons Sermons on Philippians Serving Jesus at Work Sexuality Sin St Paul Steve Chalke Strange Fire Suffering T4G T4G Statement TAB09 Tamasin Warnock Teamwork Terry Virgo The Atonement Debate - Chalke book The Soulwinner The Spirit-Filled Church The Traitor Within Theologcial Spectrums Theosis Tim Challies Tim Keller Titus TOAM06 TOAM07 TOAM08 TOAM09 TOAM10 TOAM11 Todd Bentley Tope Koleoso Total Depravity Video Water Baptism Wayne Grudem Worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 May 2025 April 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 June 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Jude quotes from the Book of Enoch in his epistle.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author Books by Adrian Warnock

See All Titles »