Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Acts of the Apostasy

Home
Catholic
Communion For The Divorced & Remarried: The Parable People Are Forgetting

Communion For The Divorced & Remarried: The Parable People Are Forgetting

Last updated on: February 21, 2016 at 9:36 am by Larry D

Communion For The Divorced & Remarried: The Parable People Are Forgetting 2016-02-21T09:36:53-05:00 Larry D

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A parable has been forgotten amidst the talk and chatter concerning whether the Church should allow divorced and remarried Catholics (without having had their previous marriage annulled) to receive Holy Communion, or create some sort of ‘path’ moving forward.

Remember Matthew 22:1-14? Good thing I’m here to remind y’all. Here are the pertinent verses:

But when the king came in to look at the guests, he saw there a man who had no wedding garment; and he said to him, “Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding garment?” And he was speechless. Then the king said to the attendants, “Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into the outer darkness; there men weep and gnash their teeth.”

Now, this parable’s about many things – primarily about the kingdom of Heaven – but it’s also about how a person must be in a state of grace to receive the Eucharist. We have to be properly dressed.

So if someone’s divorced and remarried, without having gotten an annulment – they’re not properly dressed.

If someone’s fornicating – they’re not properly dressed.

If someone thinks the Church is wrong about gay ‘marriage’ – they’re not properly dressed.

If someone’s skipping Mass most Sundays, because they just haven’t felt like going – they’re not properly dressed.

If someone broke the Communion fast – they’re not properly dressed.

If someone’s contracepting – they’re not properly dressed.

And so on. The Church has been clear about this – it’s not a secret. We aren’t required to be perfect – we’re required to be in a state of grace. That’s the dress code, if you will. While it’s true no one is truly worthy to “receive Him under our roof”, it’s also equally true we have to be in a state of grace to receive Holy Communion. We’re required to humble ourselves in the sight of God, and submit to the authority of the Church. Too often I’m hearing and reading people defiantly proclaiming “primacy of conscience!”, expecting the Church to humbly acquiesce to their pride and selfishness. Sounds awfully similar to “Non serviam!”, doesn’t it?

So what should a person do? Refrain from receiving, of course, until being properly dressed. Get to confession as soon as possible (i.e., leave your gift at the altar and make amends. Jesus said that, too), repent and be forgiven. In the case of being divorced and remarried, more is required, I admit that. But here’s the thing: Christ didn’t institute the Church in order to take away our crosses, but to provide the graces necessary to bear them. It must be a difficult thing, not being able to receive (it’s hard for me on those occasional Sundays when I have to refrain, so I can’t imagine not receiving every Sunday), but Holy Communion is not the sole source of grace. Attending Mass in and of itself imparts grace, right? In fact, we’re obligated to attend Mass on Sundays and Holy Days – we’re not obligated to receive Holy Communion. According to Church’s precepts, we’re obligated to receive the Eucharist once a year, during the Easter season. That’s it. Not receiving Holy Communion isn’t sinful – but receiving it while “improperly dressed” is very sinful.

So much so, Jesus uses strong language to describe the man’s punishment – identical to other passages in the Gospel where Jesus describes the treatment of the condemned. Because when we receive communion while not in a state of grace -while being in objective mortal sin – we bring condemnation upon ourselves. St Paul says so very clearly in his letter to the Corinthians:

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why so many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.

“Guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord.” Tough words. Tough, but true.

Another thing to remember – it’s the king who has the man tossed out. His attendants followed the king’s command, but they didn’t make the decision. They left the judgment to the guy in charge. There’s a lesson in that: keep our eyes on our own paper (to borrow an expression from my friend and co-blogger Rebecca Frech). St Paul wrote, “Let a man examine himself…”, not “Hey, that person shouldn’t be receiving Holy Communion!!” Let those in charge – i.e., the Church – take care of it.

Because a time may come when we’re the ones who are improperly dressed, but if we truly love the Lord, we will humbly refrain from presenting ourselves at the feast.

Image credit: Xavier Boudreau [Creative Commons] via Flickr

Previous Post

October 21, 2015

PARISH REPORT: Church Installs "Judge-Free Room" For Non-Communicants

Next Post

October 27, 2015 Get Your Synod On The Family Blog Swag!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion All The World's A Blog And we Are Merely Posters American Catholics AoftheA Public Service Announcement Bible Bishops Caption Contest Catholic Blogs Catholycs Crossfit Culture Eucharist Faith Gospels Heaven And Hell Holy Days Of Obligation Huffington Post Humor Lent Literature Liturgy Marriage Mary Music National Catholic Reporter New Evangelization News Parish Report Parody Patheosi Politics Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Prayer Pseudo-Science Puns Sacraments Saints Satire Say Hello To Our Robot Overlords Science Sin Is Still Sin Snark So-Called Same-Sex Marriage Sports St Pope John Paul II Technology Television The Crazy Right Wing Bible The Progressive Bible Things Not Said In Scripture Thoughts Uncategorized Vatican Video Womynpreests Year of Mercy

Select a Month January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say he does not do the good he wants to do, but instead does?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The evil he does not want to do What is sinful What leads to death What displeases God